Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, CrawlSlow said:

Owner - go TSB 21-NA-199 I choose you!

 

GM - 🤨

 

Moment later, GM :driving: to the bank with your money

 

In my experience, if you go in with knowledge, some information and background and escalate your concern- they usually work with you. I was offered they cover something out of warranty 50%. So while he might not get it for free, walking in and acknowledging GM has a known problem with the gearbox - they may be willing to work with you.

 

Never hurts to try, worst they can say is no which leaves you in the same spot as you started.

Edited by 14burrito
  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 10/13/2021 at 4:37 PM, Grumpy Bear said:

BTW a 3 year 100K warranty? Most people cover about 12K a year. They feel pretty safe with giving the illusion of reliable without actually delivering on it very often. 

 

Ask how many 6L80E failures there are when mounted behind the 4.3 V6. (next to none)

They don't use the JMBX converter 😉 

And no, the V6 unit will not fit or work with the V8's

Long time lurker and first time poster. So what you’re saying is that the 6l80s behind a 4.3 hold up better?

Posted
13 hours ago, 1stJetty said:

Long time lurker and first time poster. So what you’re saying is that the 6l80s behind a 4.3 hold up better?

 

Yes. They use a different torque converter that isn't prone to self destruction. They will fair even better if a guy takes steps to keep the fluid cool, clean and changed. This also works for the V8 units too but you still have that converter issue. 

 

This does not mean that the V8 units can't last. Many do. And yet many don't. Few V6 units have ever failed.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The whole story is false. The screw is there as a temporary fix to allow the pump to even turn on. When the nozzle is returned the pump shuts off.. At this point people are just being punked   https://youtu.be/1DtlaEuHXAA?si=06mrRmw9HLUwdeRk   https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1CyRZdsaSc/ https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1DxV1Hyrqi/       SNOPES: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19HPYUnRik/
    • Follows the motif on the Sierra EV.  Satin finsh to the lower bumper area, painted above:   Elevation       Denali      
    • Not exactly what I was hoping for, but I do like it. I wonder if they'll bring back Smokey Quartz Metallic? 🤔 https://gmauthority.com/blog/2026/06/here-is-the-all-new-2027-gmc-sierra-1500/
    • Whoever greenlighted the work truck matte black front bumpers on every trim but the AT4X should be fired!  I was hoping that was an AI mistake, but just realized they were on every model of the 2027 Silverado too.     Some parts of the interior do look premium, but the Denali Ultimate dashboard looks like an afterthought.  At least they appear to have lost the microfiber the high end Silverado models showed, but the '27 High Country dash looks better than the Denali.  
    • New member here. I am researching a read-first event-recorder concept for late-model GM V8 trucks. This is not a sales post. There is no product link, price, preorder, or mailing list. I am trying to determine whether the underlying problem is real before building anything.   Has your truck ever had a brief problem such as: - rough running or a momentary misfire - an oil-pressure warning or unusual pressure event - reduced power or a brief stall - a U-code or lost-communication problem - a symptom that disappeared before the dealer or independent shop could reproduce it   If so, I would appreciate the following details: - year, model, engine, and mileage - what happened and under what conditions - whether a DTC and useful freeze-frame data were stored - whether the shop was able to reproduce it - what the eventual confirmed repair was, if known - what additional information would have helped the diagnosis   The concept being evaluated is a removable leave-in recorder that continuously retains a rolling window from before and after an event. It would not tune, reflash, clear codes, or change the vehicle calibration.   I am also not claiming that it could predict lifter failure or see every internal ECM variable.   The real question is whether continuous event history would add enough useful evidence beyond freeze frame, GDS2, and existing scan tools — or whether it would simply be another unnecessary gadget.   For owners and technicians, which problem would make something like this genuinely useful: 1. intermittent misfire or AFM/DFM-related behavior 2. oil-pressure events 3. lost communication or electrical faults 4. none of the above Please be blunt. Negative feedback is just as useful as positive feedback.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...