Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

seems all the nice under seat storage trays are for the crew cab. I have factory carpet with Chevrolet rubber full mats that interlock. What are you guys using for under seat storage? TIA

Posted
15 minutes ago, Silverado4x4 said:

I have seen that one on the net. seems small for the price. I`m wondering why can`t we use one for a crew cab? isn`t the floor the same? There are no Human occupants in the back seat of my truck. My Dogs sit in a pet hammock. so I wouldn`t need room for anyones feet... The Rough Country storage is nice, but can not get any info if it would physically fit. 

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Pale Rider said:

I have seen that one on the net. seems small for the price. I`m wondering why can`t we use one for a crew cab? isn`t the floor the same? There are no Human occupants in the back seat of my truck. My Dogs sit in a pet hammock. so I wouldn`t need room for anyones feet... The Rough Country storage is nice, but can not get any info if it would physically fit. 

Can't use a crew cab as the seat bottom is wider than a double cab seat so it will stick out from the front when the seat is down but if you not worried about it then it should fit. The floors are the same on the double cab and crew cab just the floor on the crew cab is longer than the double cab floor.

 

Go to the link I sent and compare the two one for double cab and one for crew cab it will give you the specs on each

Edited by Silverado4x4
Posted
45 minutes ago, Silverado4x4 said:

Can't use a crew cab as the seat bottom is wider than a double cab seat so it will stick out from the front when the seat is down but if you not worried about it then it should fit. The floors are the same on the double cab and crew cab just the floor on the crew cab is longer than the double cab floor.

 

Go to the link I sent and compare the two one for double cab and one for crew cab it will give you the specs on each

the only other one I found on that site was the black lockable one, yes it does look deeper. I`m ok with it sticking out. comparing the 2 seats does not look it would stick out by much more than a few inches... 

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Pale Rider said:

the only other one I found on that site was the black lockable one, yes it does look deeper. I`m ok with it sticking out. comparing the 2 seats does not look it would stick out by much more than a few inches... 

That's what she said

Edited by Transient
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

I have the Du Ha posted by Chrisr2021 above. Very sturdy. Wish it had a lockable top but other than that I'm very happy with the amount it will hold.

Edited by Jac365
Posted
5 hours ago, Jac365 said:

I have the Du Ha posted by Chrisr2021 above. Very sturdy. Wish it had a lockable top but other than that I'm very happy with the amount it will hold.

The grass is always geener in the other side.  I have the version with the lockable lid in my crew cab and wish I got the version without the lid.  With the lid you need to fold up both sides of the seat since the lid is one piece.  If you have a passenger, instead of asking them to move over, you have to ask them to get out of the truck.   Imo, be happy you don't have a lid. 

 

Btw, Du-Ha's website has the storage bins listed cheaper than e-trailer.

Posted (edited)

I wound up going with the Chevrolet Factory under seat storage... they won...

from ShopChevyParts.com   

 

update, the item is in transit, I will comment once its here and installed. 

 

1 x  2019 Silverado 1500 Underseat Storage Organizer, Double Cab, Black (84310404)
Edited by Pale Rider
add
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...
Posted

digging up kind of an old thread I know, but what all was involved with install?  I have this same storage tray under the seat of my crew cab from factory and I feel like I've got a lot of wasted space since it doesn't come all the way out under the seat.  Was thinking about pulling it out and trying to extend both ends to push the overall tray out further.  Haven't looked out how it actually mounts.

Posted

i was just thinking of trying this also. its held buy 4 bolts i belive, the 2 that hold the jack, the one that holds the tools and one in the corner in front of the tools.

Posted
36 minutes ago, 3point0 said:

i was just thinking of trying this also. its held buy 4 bolts i belive, the 2 that hold the jack, the one that holds the tools and one in the corner in front of the tools.

Ah cool, doesn’t sound bad.  Post up if you end up extending yours 3point0.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...