Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2017 GMC Sierra with the 5.3l. Last week, I noticed that the A/C was blowing cool but not cold air. When I was making the appointment with the dealership, the service rep asked if I knew which refrigerant my truck has because that would affect the cost by several hundreds. My immediate question was, "How can I find out which one is in my truck?" Her reply was that we wouldn't know until the truck was in the shop. 

 

I didn't see an A/C system name plate under the hood. Is there another way to know if I have 134a or 1234yf refrigerant?

Posted

The factory sticker is on the plastic cover over the core support directly behind the grill, basically right in front of your face when you open the hood.

 

I got $1 on it being 1234yf, my 2016 is still R134a.

Posted

Holy ******... I can't believe that I missed the large black sticker with the snowflake on it. 

 

I'd send you the $1, but since it is 1234yf, I'm going to need every dollar for the repair.. :) 

  • 2 years later...
  • 6 months later...
Posted

2017 silverado 1500 5.3. Sticker calls for R134A but I bought the R134A manifold and hose kit but they will not connect to the high and low side ports. Help!

Posted

AC is one thing I wont mess with. Unless you have the equipment and training its easy to do more harm than good. The 1234A is stupid expensive. My son is ASE certified in vehicle AC systems but he doesnt have access to the equipment. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...