Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm looking at a 2022 1500 that's allegedly "built and on the way".

 

It's equipped with: "L84-Engine: 5.3L, EcoTec3 V-8, DI, Dynamic Fuel Mgt, V V T"

 

The build sheet shows Option Code "YK9-CREDIT - NOT EQUIPPED WITH DYNAMIC FUEL MANAGEMENT"

 

Is this deletion a chip shortage issue, or is Chevy deleting the Dynamic Fuel Management due to engine/lifter issues?

 

Thanks

 

 

Posted

I recall its due to the chip shortage. And it's one of those where it's welcomed to be not equipped with 🤣

  • Like 1
Posted

Correct.  YK9 is not equipped with DOD.  Hardware is still in the engine, ECM is missing the ability to run it.  It is not an item that will be retrofitted either so its always off.  

Posted
20 minutes ago, newdude said:

Correct.  YK9 is not equipped with DOD.  Hardware is still in the engine, ECM is missing the ability to run it.  It is not an item that will be retrofitted either so its always off.  

 

With the hardware still present in the engine, what is the reasoning behind the YK9 modification? Is it being done to reduce the chances of engine issues believed to be tied to DFM?

Posted
4 minutes ago, AlDAngle said:

 

With the hardware still present in the engine, what is the reasoning behind the YK9 modification? Is it being done to reduce the chances of engine issues believed to be tied to DFM?

 

 

Its possible, but GM's line was for semiconductor allocation.  Delete DFM to re-allocate those for other vehicles. 

Posted

According to GM:

    Internal components related to AFM or DFM function will be present in engines; wiring, connectors, and fuses will be present in vehicles with RPO YK9. The ECM will not be capable of activating the cylinder deactivation technology.

    When diagnosing and repairing concerns with base engine or electrical function which may be related to AFM or DFM related hardware; utilize appropriate diagnostics within SI and replace any needed components as directed by the Electronic Parts Catalog; no changes will occur to AFM or DFM related components.

    Important: Any truck designated with RPO YK9 CANNOT be reprogrammed and changed to “Turn on” the AFM/DFM functionality.

Posted
53 minutes ago, elcamino said:

According to GM:

 

    Internal components related to AFM or DFM function will be present in engines; wiring, connectors, and fuses will be present in vehicles with RPO YK9. The ECM will not be capable of activating the cylinder deactivation technology.

 

    When diagnosing and repairing concerns with base engine or electrical function which may be related to AFM or DFM related hardware; utilize appropriate diagnostics within SI and replace any needed components as directed by the Electronic Parts Catalog; no changes will occur to AFM or DFM related components.

 

    Important: Any truck designated with RPO YK9 CANNOT be reprogrammed and changed to “Turn on” the AFM/DFM functionality.

 

It can still grenade like all the rest of them.

Posted (edited)

IMHO, I find it hard to believe that Chevy would turn off an engine's DFM to reallocate its chip. Especially because no DFM equals less MPG, and GM is very concerned with CAFE Standards.

 

On the other hand, the cam, lifters, and other DFM (DOD) specific parts are still present in the engine. If there is a reliability issue with these parts, will disabling DFM lessen failures?

Edited by AlDAngle
Posted

Just bought a new Silverado last week. How do I know if it has DFM? Sticker did not mention any credit for DFM, so safe to assume it has it?

Posted
1 hour ago, TxSilver said:

Just bought a new Silverado last week. How do I know if it has DFM? Sticker did not mention any credit for DFM, so safe to assume it has it?

Here is a snip from a sticker with the YK9 option on Build Sheet:

 

 

No_DFM.GIF

Posted
1 hour ago, AlDAngle said:

Here is a snip from a sticker with the YK9 option on Build Sheet:

 

 

No_DFM.GIF

Thanks. Looks like my truck does have DFM enabled.

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,915
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    ChristopherDobson
    Newest Member
    ChristopherDobson
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,361 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monthly payment is only part of the equation. With today's prices and interest rates, I'd look at the total monthly cost: payment, insurance, registration, fuel, maintenance, and expected repairs. A vehicle that fits comfortably into your budget is usually the better choice than stretching for a higher trim. I've also kept my vehicles longer over the past few years. New cars have gotten expensive enough that driving one for 10+ years, while staying on top of maintenance, often ends up being the most cost-effective approach.
    • 10 Ford and Chevy engines proven to reach 300,000 miles   You may note a common 3K OCI on this list of gas motors. I skipped over the diesels. Dh'O. 
    • Thanks newdude!  By the time manual selection is needed, I'm probably too much of a control-freak to depend on the transmission sensing braking to activate automatic downshifting.  I would be anticipating the situation and already be manually downshifting.   This truck replaced a 2004.5 LLY diesel with the Allison 5-speed.  Putting it in T/H made noticeable differences (when the torque converter locked, upshift points, downshift behavior).  On this 2024 gasser with the 10L1000 I haven't been able to detect much, if any, difference.  Ok, I can never tell now when the torque converter locks up.  But I also don't notice differences in shifting.  For downhills, I've probably already manually downshifted by then anyway.  Since it's also more awkward (than the 2004.5) to engage/disengage I don't even bother.  Or maybe it doesn't really matter with just a 3k lb. camper in the bed?   Thanks also for the list of reasons the charging system might select various voltages.  However, what I am seeing doesn't fall into any of those categories.  It very definitely, and very consistently, rises after coasting/braking.  Maybe not immediately, but not very long after coasting/braking.  Very consistently drops voltage when no longer coasting/braking.  It might also be interacting with the camper battery charging (I might disconnect the camper and see if it changes the charging behavior).  I also need to recheck turning on headlights for when I want to force it to charge the camper.   Another JR, in June I converted the camper to LiFePO4.  Since it's not a good idea to try to charge lithiums directly using truck, I installed a Victron Orion XS DC-DC charger (which BTW is AMAZING!!).  Being cheap, I only had to buy that one item (besides the battery, of course) to do the conversion.  The camper OEM 120v battery charger (only 19 years old and works perfectly) and the truck feed the input to the DC-DC charger (not at the same time).  But I didn't want the camper charger feeding back to the truck so I kept the old separator.  I considered replacing the separator with a 30amp diode but that means more work and might add another 1/2 volt drop.  One thing that surprised me was the voltage drop over the long 10awg wire run, so I can only charge smoothly at 8 amps (because the DC-DC charger is completely configurable).  Another reason I don't want an added voltage drop with the diode.  I might also be a little lazy but all this work is being done under the sink with a small cabinet opening.    
    • apparently CA smog is (or at least was)  checking that the vehicle is using the oem and/or a ca smog approved tune, so I expect you'll fail inspection doing it.
    • yes, leaking exhaust will mess up o2 sensor readings, which in turn messes up fuel trims.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...