Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My brother brings home his Lightening today.  It is hard to believe how fast all of the hype over the prototypes of full sized EV pickups is now a reality.  Ford really did a brilliant job in planning and getting their version produced.  If money was not an issue,  I'd be doing the same as my brother!   I have a reserve on the Silverado EV - WT and am hoping that my wait will be rewarded with a more affordable product.  The Work Truck version is basic but will still be an upgrade to my current '15 SLE.   I appreciate the global concerns about supplying batteries and power to charge them but I believe EV's are the better option currently.   I'd like to hear from others on their plans regarding EV's! 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Donstar said:

My brother brings home his Lightening today.  It is hard to believe how fast all of the hype over the prototypes of full sized EV pickups is now a reality.  Ford really did a brilliant job in planning and getting their version produced.  If money was not an issue,  I'd be doing the same as my brother!   I have a reserve on the Silverado EV - WT and am hoping that my wait will be rewarded with a more affordable product.  The Work Truck version is basic but will still be an upgrade to my current '15 SLE.   I appreciate the global concerns about supplying batteries and power to charge them but I believe EV's are the better option currently.   I'd like to hear from others on their plans regarding EV's! 

After reading and learning how the minerals are mine and where they are. And who controls them I’m on pause. The environment impacts and the amount of fossil fuel use during the mining of some minerals are mind blowing. Then there’s disposal and supporting infrastructure. In saying all that if it fits your lifestyle and gives you pleasure go for it. As far as being environmentally friendly, I’m not there. The point of our hard work and sacrifice is always moving forward with convenience and efficiency. Not there yet for the most part . 

  • Like 2
Posted

For the past 50+ years I have owned full sized pickups.  The downside has always been the initial cost and the ongoing fuel expense.    For me to go electric is not going to help the initial cost but the fuel savings and maintenance will be a bonus.  The net impact on the environment is another debate.  I believe that going electric will have a net positive impact.  Ford, GM, Rivian, Tesla etc. are attempting to produce products that attract buyers on all sides of the environmental debate. There are some very promising EV options no matter your stand on climate.   Of course nothing new goes without opposition.  I told a friend when speaking about the Lightening that it is hard to argue about  close to 800lb ft of torque and 0 - 60 in 4.5 seconds.  He responded with, “It is more fun to drive a slow car fast, than a fast car slow”.  I have yet to drive an EV full sized pickup but I know Rivians and Fords are out there.  It would be great to hear from those who have first hand experience.

Posted

I can't get on board the EV thing. To me it's just a new type of technology trying to entice buyers, gotta have the latest. I agree for some users it'a appealing. 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Donstar said:

For the past 50+ years I have owned full sized pickups.  The downside has always been the initial cost and the ongoing fuel expense.    For me to go electric is not going to help the initial cost but the fuel savings and maintenance will be a bonus.  The net impact on the environment is another debate.  I believe that going electric will have a net positive impact.  Ford, GM, Rivian, Tesla etc. are attempting to produce products that attract buyers on all sides of the environmental debate. There are some very promising EV options no matter your stand on climate.   Of course nothing new goes without opposition.  I told a friend when speaking about the Lightening that it is hard to argue about  close to 800lb ft of torque and 0 - 60 in 4.5 seconds.  He responded with, “It is more fun to drive a slow car fast, than a fast car slow”.  I have yet to drive an EV full sized pickup but I know Rivians and Fords are out there.  It would be great to hear from those who have first hand experience.

I have to agree with your friends it’s more fun to drive a slower vehicle fast. Especially vehicles that make the right noises. I’ve experienced both. A sports car through the turns at reasonable speeds is more fun than 0-60 at 5 seconds. Although not an electric. I had the pleasure of experiencing a TRX. It’s too tempting to keep the hammer down. I’ve read some articles lately about the true cost of charging an electric vehicle. I’m really not downing your enthusiasm. I listen to a popular radio show on Saturday called CARPROUSA. He’s yet to test an electric that went the range advertised. And has been stranded. He’s actually for electric especially for the performance angle. He’s all in for hybrids especially Toyota’s. 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, diyer2 said:

I can't get on board the EV thing. To me it's just a new type of technology trying to entice buyers, gotta have the latest. I agree for some users it'a appealing. 

 

Um, they were big in the late 1800's and early 1900's and even held the land speed record for some years. EV's are by no means a new type of technology. Shoot, technically they pre-date Benz's car as a three wheeled electric version was created a few years before.

 

EV's certainly have their pluses, I still think for some years a plug in hybrid is the best of both worlds until infrastructure and other meaningful tech can catch up (charge times mainly). I would buy a plug in hybrid truck, but not an EV yet. My wifes next car will be a PHEV at the very least if not a full EV.  

 

Tyler 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, diyer2 said:

I can't get on board the EV thing. To me it's just a new type of technology trying to entice buyers, gotta have the latest. I agree for some users it'a appealing. 

Something’s fishy is going on with the electric deal. The hard push before we’re ready. That ties in with renewables. All that could be a good thing if we take it slow learning as we go. Right now there’re telling Californians not to charge their vehicles at certain times. There’s the dirty secret in regards to mining the minerals and who controls them. I fear it’s more about politics and profits than environment. In a free society you want electric and it fits. That’s your choice go for it. The forcing by mandating that’s what will keep me out.

  • Like 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, Amcguy1970 said:

 

Um, they were big in the late 1800's and early 1900's and even held the land speed record for some years. EV's are by no means a new type of technology. Shoot, technically they pre-date Benz's car as a three wheeled electric version was created a few years before.

 

EV's certainly have their pluses, I still think for some years a plug in hybrid is the best of both worlds until infrastructure and other meaningful tech can catch up (charge times mainly). I would buy a plug in hybrid truck, but not an EV yet. My wifes next car will be a PHEV at the very least if not a full EV.  

 

Tyler 

In 1870 Rockefeller's, Flagler, Rogers,Andrews, Harkness founders of Standard Oil  made sure of that. For once marketing and robber barons are not choosing a technology, reality of a warming planet and climate change is. Paradigm shifts are hard for society. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

It amazing how some minds work. If the so called robber barons could have produced batteries that powered electric instead of oil. That’s where we be now. Oil then and now is responsible for our way of life. The head long full speed ahead towards renewables will cause the reverse and poverty. Eyes on Europe. Global cooling or warming or whatever they call it today is a normal weather pattern. Risks takers will find a way  to make money only if people will buy. Government intervention usually amounts to money spent and failure follows. If gas prices, rolling blackouts and inflation hasn’t convinced people to pump the brakes. Then you can’t fix stupid. You get what you deserve.

Edited by KARNUT
  • Like 3
  • Sad 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, customboss said:

In 1870 Rockefeller's, Flagler, Rogers,Andrews, Harkness founders of Standard Oil  made sure of that. For once marketing and robber barons are not choosing a technology, reality of a warming planet and climate change is. Paradigm shifts are hard for society. 

 

 


Stupid question…if these are your convictions, why did you literally just buy a gas truck? Don’t tell me you’re just another Al Gore. Ditch that climate destroyer, and get with the program.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, KARNUT said:

It amazing how some minds work. If the so called robber barons could have produced batteries that powered electric instead of oil. That’s where we be now. Oil then and now is responsible for our way of life. The head long full speed ahead towards renewables will cause the reverse and poverty. Eyes on Europe. Global cooling or warming or whatever they call it today is a normal weather pattern. Risks takers will find a way  to make money only if people will buy. Government intervention usually amounts to money spent and failure follows. If gas prices, rolling blackouts and inflation hasn’t convinced people to pump the brakes. Then you can’t fix stupid. You get what you deserve.

Government isn't driving change to EV and renewable power. Again and AGAIN I remind you and others that we live in a DEMOCRACY.  Free enterprise is driving changes.  Culture wars again have you and others blinded by corporations going where the future is. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:


Stupid question…if these are your convictions, why did you literally just buy a gas truck? Don’t tell me you’re just another Al Gore. Ditch that climate destroyer, and get with the program.

 

 

Not my convictions or opinion. It's a fact that industry is going to change from unsustainable fossil fuels driven markets OVER TIME IN SCALE.  No matter what culture war blinders one may have on.  

 

On my decision to purchase a gasoline Trail Boss: they didn't make a EV Trail Boss and I need lifted 4WD out here. My cost to charge a EV truck via garage set up would be 6.2 cents a KWH. I could not beat that cost anywhere and I am a rural electric CO-OP owner so would even be cheaper every year when we get our rebate and costs kept down since we are non profit. 

 

Even here in more remote parts of southern CO there are chargers in town and on roads for quick recharge if needed. 

 

Ask Pakistan how the floods are.  Note the Arctic and Antarctic are heating 7X faster than the rest of the world. 

Floods, heat, rapid ,and larger cyclic moves in climate are causing catastrophes world wide and impacting US already. 

 

Why is that?  Released green house gases. What is primary driver, fossil fuels burning. 

 

We can resist, deny, close our eyes but Gore was right.  As much as I hate to admit he was right. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Some interesting reading to make an informed decision about what is really going on.  

 

Climate science or politics? Disentangling the roles of citizen beliefs and support for energy in the United States

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214629621005065

 

 

CLEAN POWER

Conservatives Do Want A Clean Energy Transition

Traditionally, conservatives have endorsed fossil fuels as the only viable energy source. Recently, however, momentum has shifted so that more conservatives than ever are publicly embracing the potential for renewables.

 

https://cleantechnica.com/2022/06/13/conservatives-do-want-a-clean-energy-transition/

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, customboss said:

Government isn't driving change to EV and renewable power. Again and AGAIN I remind you and others that we live in a DEMOCRACY.  Free enterprise is driving changes.  Culture wars again have you and others blinded by corporations going where the future is. 

What! That’s laughable. But as usual you live in a fantasy world. Have a nice day.

  • Like 3
Posted
27 minutes ago, customboss said:

Some interesting reading to make an informed decision about what is really going on.  

 

Climate science or politics? Disentangling the roles of citizen beliefs and support for energy in the United States

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214629621005065

 

 

CLEAN POWER

Conservatives Do Want A Clean Energy Transition

Traditionally, conservatives have endorsed fossil fuels as the only viable energy source. Recently, however, momentum has shifted so that more conservatives than ever are publicly embracing the potential for renewables.

 

https://cleantechnica.com/2022/06/13/conservatives-do-want-a-clean-energy-transition/

There’s more to electric vehicles than just plugging in. There’s more pollution to electric batteries than natural gas. It’ll be exposed eventually, I’ll wait. 

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,256 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...