Jump to content

Leveling Kit - Upper Strut Spacers Vs. Lower Block Spacers

BlaineBug

By BlaineBug
in Engines & Drivetrain

 Share

Recommended Posts

14burrito Enthusiast

14burrito

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, BlaineBug said:

 

That is true although I thought the upper bushings were the ones that had the alignment for caster/camber and then the toe would be adjusted via tie rod ends.  I don't believe they ever loosen/tighten the bottom control arm bushings at all.  I have never seen an adjustable lower control arm bushing for any make or manufacturer.

Toyota has been eccentric cams on their LCA's since like the 90s.

14burrito Enthusiast

14burrito

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, ftwhite said:

When you add spacers, you are not extending the length of the strut/coilover. You simply move the control arms further down in their travel arch. Since the top mounting is fixed on the body, and the bottom is on the lower control arm. Hence the lift. The length of the shock and the spring is the same in this case. What changes is how much sooner the upper control arm hits the droop stop (down stop built into the frame) and how much longer it takes (or how much more room the wheel has in the wheel well) when it is fully compressed.
Most of the time, when you add a lift/level/spacer/coilover, you also get an alignment. The control arm bolts (only 4 on the body side) get adjusted, so that generally addresses the bushing bind you mentioned.   

Regarding spacers...

Back to your comment "not extending the length, just moving the arm further down"...How can you say adding X spacer doesnt alter the coilovers length??

 

Again, talking spacers and stock coilovers...

Static ride height - the only way to increase leverage is to increase the coilover assemblies length as can be seen in the attached drawing. Adding a 1" spacer on the top or under increases the assembly length which is why you gain lift. You have not alter the coilover preload therefor no change to the coilovers spring rate. 

 

Same concept as if you look a stock truck. Jack up the front an inch or two with a floor jack - you have reduced load on the coilover assembly making it longer than it was before. Let's say the spring rates 600lbs per inch, jacking up the front removes weight off the assembly so it is no longer compressed by X amount of inches due to a lack of weight to compress.

Screenshot_20220907-072037_Gallery.jpg

  • Like 1
ftwhite Enthusiast

ftwhite

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, BlaineBug said:

 

  I don't believe they ever loosen/tighten the bottom control arm bushings at all.  I have never seen an adjustable lower control arm bushing for any make or manufacturer.

Toyota 4Runners and Tacomas both adjust via the lower arms. My Jeep TJ also has adjustable lowers.

but I agree they may not touch them on a Silverado unless you ask them to.

ftwhite Enthusiast

ftwhite

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, 14burrito said:

Regarding spacers...

Back to your comment "not extending the length, just moving the arm further down"...How can you say adding X spacer doesnt alter the coilovers length??

 

Again, talking spacers and stock coilovers...

Static ride height - the only way to increase leverage is to increase the coilover assemblies length as can be seen in the attached drawing. Adding a 1" spacer on the top or under increases the assembly length which is why you gain lift. You have not alter the coilover preload therefor no change to the coilovers spring rate. 

 

Same concept as if you look a stock truck. Jack up the front an inch or two with a floor jack - you have reduced load on the coilover assembly making it longer than it was before. Let's say the spring rates 600lbs per inch, jacking up the front removes weight off the assembly so it is no longer compressed by X amount of inches due to a lack of weight to compress.

I think we agree, but are just calling what the "assembly" is different. I think in your description, you consider the spacers part of the shock/coilover/spring. What I am saying is that they are actually part of the body and arm mounts. They just move the mounting locations. The fact you bolt them to the top of the shock/coilover first, is just a convenient installation step. They don't change the shock length, preload, or piston location at rest. Its the same.  

 

If you use coilovers and preload to adjust ride height, you are changing the relation of the spring to the shock, which changes its ride height length (lift or lower) but since the shock piston and shaft are the same, you end up just moving where they start off. So they bottom out sooner, or top out sooner. Unless you get the longer ones designed for the desired height to begin with. 
 

I think we are saying the same thing.  

BlaineBug Enthusiast

BlaineBug

Posted
  • Author
Posted
37 minutes ago, ftwhite said:

Toyota 4Runners and Tacomas both adjust via the lower arms. My Jeep TJ also has adjustable lowers.

but I agree they may not touch them on a Silverado unless you ask them to.

 

Your Wrangler TJ has a solid front axle and aftermarket adjustable control arms to adjust their length to achieve proper caster angle and alignment in wheel well.  Apples/oranges.

ftwhite Enthusiast

ftwhite

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, BlaineBug said:

 

Your Wrangler TJ has a solid front axle and aftermarket adjustable control arms to adjust their length to achieve proper caster angle and alignment in wheel well.  Apples/oranges.

Sure. Fruit. 🙂 You had mentioned 8 bolts, and I could only come up with solid axle to count 8 bolts (one on each end of four arms used to located a solid axle. So I just offered examples of adjustable lower arms used to located the wheel that had bushings. 
Regardless of the apple/oranges, I would think the bushing on the body side don't really care if the axle is solid or of a CV joint nature. As you point out, it needs to be torqued/tightened at ride height to maximize lifetime. I honestly had not thought of that when I did my lifts on my Silverado. So its a good point and we agree on that at least. 🙂   

BlaineBug Enthusiast

BlaineBug

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 hours ago, ftwhite said:

Sure. Fruit. 🙂 You had mentioned 8 bolts, and I could only come up with solid axle to count 8 bolts (one on each end of four arms used to located a solid axle. So I just offered examples of adjustable lower arms used to located the wheel that had bushings. 
Regardless of the apple/oranges, I would think the bushing on the body side don't really care if the axle is solid or of a CV joint nature. As you point out, it needs to be torqued/tightened at ride height to maximize lifetime. I honestly had not thought of that when I did my lifts on my Silverado. So its a good point and we agree on that at least. 🙂   

I like women, not a fruit, you're being unreasonable.

Your Jeep Wrangler TJ has/had the same front axle as my Jeep Cherokee, a Dana 30.  Solid front axle.  I had Rusty's adjustable upper and lower control arms on mine.  Rough Country control arm drop brackets.  Rusty's steering (sucked!) and GoFerIt above-the-knuckle steering inserts.  Rusty's adjustable tracbar.  Rear axle was a Chrysler 8.25.  Had a Tom Woods rear driveshaft made for it too and a yoke conversion kit for the NP231 transfer case.

I started off with a 3" lift with 30x9.50s, then went to 4.5" with 32x11.50s, and finally settled around 8" with 33x1250s.  Looking back I should have stayed 3", it was the most friendly for daily driving!

ftwhite Enthusiast

ftwhite

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, BlaineBug said:

Your Jeep Wrangler TJ has/had the same front axle as my Jeep Cherokee, a Dana 30.  Solid front axle.  I had Rusty's adjustable upper and lower control arms on mine.  Rough Country control arm drop brackets.  Rusty's steering (sucked!) and GoFerIt above-the-knuckle steering inserts.  Rusty's adjustable tracbar.  Rear axle was a Chrysler 8.25.  Had a Tom Woods rear driveshaft made for it too and a yoke conversion kit for the NP231 transfer case.

Sounds like a great setup. Agree that for jeeps, higher creates more issues and drivability problems. My TJ came with a 3inch body lift and I added 2inch lift with springs. I want to cut the body lift in half, but haven't pulled the trigger yet. 

Apples/Oranges = Fruit. Not my intent to be derogatory. Sorry about how I worded that. 😞 

 

BlaineBug Enthusiast

BlaineBug

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I took some more measurements today, this time from the floor of my garage to the bottom of the frame.  3 tires at 35 PSI and 1 at 36 PSI according to dash display.

 

Front Left = 11-5/8"

Front Right = 11-7/8"

Rear Left = 12-1/4"

Rear Right = 12-1/8"

 

So when using the frame as reference there is less than an inch of difference from front to rear.  That's pretty level.  I don't have much weight but I have a tool box, some shackles, straps, and 3 inserts for the hitch receiver, so maybe 75 pounds in weight in the back at all times.

 

I'd have to say with such little difference being reported, I don't think I have any desire for a "leveling kit" at this time after all.

 

Maybe it's the trucks with the rear leafs that have a more significant difference from front to rear?

Jeffrey Soulages New Member

Jeffrey Soulages

Posted
Posted

I have a general question on this you may be able to shed light on. If I were to put a 1.75" level in the form of a spacer on top of the shock, would it put any added stress anywhere else? If I kept the factory control arms, would it compromise them or the ball joint?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,739
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    JimmyB4
    Newest Member
    JimmyB4
    Joined

  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 696 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • mikeyk101
      2014 - 2018 Chevrolet Silverado/GMC Sierra

      By mikeyk101 · Posted

      I have a 2016 that I bought new and still own. I'm around 129,000 miles now. The biggest problem was a transmission failure about 2 years ago around 95000 miles. No warning, just failed while driving down a back road. A reman GM transmission installed and it's been fine ever since. A few other minor problems along the way. I am in no hurry to replace it. It's been paid off long ago and do plan on driving this as long as I can.   I will admit I am leery about all the additional electronics in the newer models and feel that it is just more potential problems. I think there's actually more than I would have wanted in this 2016 but so far so good. I think even if something major like lifter failure happened, it would still be cheaper to at worst, drop a new engine in than buy a new vehicle. 
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      I’ve own several successful businesses. I’ve bought homes and lived in different states. I’d witness several generations buy homes and survive in different economic circumstances. You get awful sippy when people have different experiences than you do. You live a life. I’ve lived a life. It seems our experience has been different. You can point out generalized statistics. Some people learn how to thrive when the odds are against them. Living in different states does make a difference in a persons quality of life and economic outcomes and opportunities. That’s a fact Jack. It’s my truth, my life. Hard work and long hours the right environment made my families life easier. And yes moving to a different state increased the odds of that happening. Stats are generalized. People who thrive don’t make excuses. They beat the odds. Others get mad and point to those statistics. I guess that’s you. My post pointed out how you helped people beat the odds. Somehow your panties got in a wad. Go figure. 
    • MrChips
      Road Master Active Suspension

      By MrChips · Posted

      Good question, I don't remember for sure but I believe it was the HD. I will check and get back to you.
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Point of the post sir was that while both wages and cost are rising EVERYWHERE; the cost is rising faster EVERYWHERE than the ability to buy EVERYWHERE. We're not going down the location rabbit hole. I'm aware of what economic migration is. I've lived in four states including Texas.   It's what "Purchasing Power" means.   I'm not telling you what I think. I'm telling what the government, your government, data shows.   It wasn't an argument. It wasn't a suggestion. It was a statement of FACT. You are absolutely entitled to your own opinion. Your not entitled to your own facts. If you and I were, they wouldn't be facts.    fact /făkt/   noun Knowledge or information based on real occurrences. "an account based on fact; a blur of fact and fancy." Something demonstrated to exist or known to have existed. "Genetic engineering is now a fact. That Chaucer was a real person is an undisputed fact." A real occurrence; an event. "had to prove the facts of the case." The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition • More at Wordnik   If you'd like to disagree call your Senator or Representative and let him know his departments are in error. But you and I? We are not doing this. 
    • JimCost2014
      Transmission jumping out of gear while driving.

      By JimCost2014 · Posted

      Probably a one and done post, but do you have a CEL on the dash? Was having issues with my transmission, fortunately only a week, and it turned out to be the transmission harness. Valve body was in good shape, so new harness with all the sensors attached, new fluid, and filter. Seems to have worked so far?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...