Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
25 minutes ago, richard wysong said:

with the warnings and the scanner not connecting it's pointing toward a BCM or buss problem possibly because of a bad ground. There have been numerous posts of similar problems and I don't believe anyone has posted the cause or cure,PLEASE when you figure it out post the fix! Reading past posts I believe there is a ground splice pack up high in the dash on the left(?) side that has the grounds for the buss network. Hopefully someone more knowledgable than me will chime in here

Thanks Richard! You've given me an additional area to check!

 

Posted

UPDATE:

 I removed the starter relay and jumped it out, engine turned over. Also swapped out the relay with another.

Still won't start though via the ignition. 

I guess that rules out the battery and starter?

Posted

look at the video posted by BlaineBug under popular forum topics. check the body and frame for ground voltage drop

  • 5 weeks later...
Posted

So without seeing a wiring diagram I would guess the wire from the relay to the starter must be broken, I would check it at the starter as that would be the most common trouble area. Are you sure you jumped the correct terminals at the relay and there was 12v at the relay?

Posted

I had something similar with my truck while it was under warranty.  It was the datalink wires shorting together up near the rear tire. 

 

The key switch is wired to the BCM and it has to tell the ECM to engage the starter relay via datalink.  If those two aren’t talking, it won’t crank.  I also had all the dash messages you have along with an outside temp reading of -40 (it was around 60 F then). 

 

This theory also aligns with your observation that a scan tool will not connect.  

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, ksiesel said:

I had something similar with my truck while it was under warranty.  It was the datalink wires shorting together up near the rear tire. 

 

The key switch is wired to the BCM and it has to tell the ECM to engage the starter relay via datalink.  If those two aren’t talking, it won’t crank.  I also had all the dash messages you have along with an outside temp reading of -40 (it was around 60 F then). 

 

This theory also aligns with your observation that a scan tool will not connect.  

Thanks for that info! I need to scour that area again but It was tough due to the harness being sandwiched between the frame rail and bed. Gonna take the wheel off this time to look.

Which side were you having trouble on? Driver rear or passenger?

I finally end up taking the truck to the dealership and it's been there since 11/1 and they're just telling me "we're working on it". Sounds like I need to prepare for some expensive news.

 

 

Thank you!

 

Posted

My datalink short was right at the terminating resistor on the drivers side.  You should be able to check this datalink circuit by measuring resistance from Can H to Can L with the key off and all harnesses/modules plugged in.  There should be a 120 ohm terminator at each end and they are in parallel.  A good reading will be around 60 Ohms.  I believe you can check it at the DLC under the dash, but I don’t recall what pins.

Posted

OK, just spoke with the dealer and after 29 days, they have diagnosed my truck with a shorted HMI module. 

I gave them the ok to repair at $1500. Ugh. 

Once I got home, I had the opportunity to look up the module and found them for around $300. Zeesh......that's why they're called the "stealership".

Oh, after the dealer told me the price, he still tried to upsell me on a cabin filter and wipers!

Hopefully she will be fixed soon!

  • Like 1
Posted

I was confused as to how a module that controls the radio and navigation prevents the truck from starting but, the video explains how there's a "network", a sort of LAN that ties into the ignition circuitry. 

I wish I knew about this video before authorizing the dealer to complete the work but, quite honestly, when it comes to these computerized vehicles, I don't have any way to check for dead modules.

Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, robert24b said:

This explains it better than I can

 

https://youtu.be/227dndw46JY

@pgamboais always a font of electrical information when it comes to these trucks! I have bought a few harnesses from him and he's very responsive and helpful.
harnessdr.com

Edited by MikeBMW
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...