Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I hope this is the right place to post this. I'm in the middle of trying to get a new gen 2014 (LV3) 4.3l rebuilt. Motor had 318XXX on it and began to misfire. Low compression in cylinder 1. My machine shop guy says he needs .040 over pistons and he can't find any pistons anywhere. I checked rock auto and even called summit and they say nothing available as well. Does anyone know where to find some or a work around for this. I had hoped just like with the old 4.3l you could use 350 pistons and I could use some 5.3l pistons but their bores are pretty significant different sizes. Any help would be appreciated, motors been at the machine shop for 3 months.

Posted

I've used JE Piston or on occasion ROSS when I need something no one is making. They will make anything. OR...can the block be sleeved? 

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm sure it could be sleeved but this particular machine shop I went with the guy isn't set up to do sleeves. I actually called Silvolite and they said they offer them but they won't be produced until end of May. I was quoted $6500 for a new engine from chevy but their on back order with no date as to when they would be in stock and LKQ wants $4500 for a used engine with 100k. So I figured a rebuild would be the best route.

  • Like 1
Posted

That is certainly a laundry list of problems. Looks like ya wait. GM hasn't any oversized pistons? 

 

Sperry or Jasper? 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Nick75scottsdale said:

I checked JE and Ross like you suggested and they don't list any pistons for chevy V6s. As far as I could see chevy offered .020 overs but that's it. I haven't looked into Sperry or Jasper.

 

JE & ROSS will make what you need if you ask.  I had JE make a custom piston for a 1952 Royal Endfield Bullet. Venolia used to do all my custom work until they closed. Don't look, ask. 

 

Is too far gone for 20 over?  I mean, did it need 40's or did you just want more displacement? 

 

 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

318k?  Machine shop says it needs .040 over?  Does it really have to be pushed out that far or is the shop you picked not so well versed in the work they do?  

 

What was the exact cause of the low compression?  Bad rings?  

 

I'd be looking at a used engine or new engine at this point still.  

Edited by newdude
  • Like 1
Posted

The reason I went with this shop is because the other 4 i called said they wouldn't even touch it because they knew parts are hard to get right now for the new gen 4.3 and this guy already had a machined crank sitting at his shop for this engine.

Posted

If the engine made it that far while being .032 thousandths out, I'd just do a .020 and now it'll only be .012 out, should get you many many more years.

 

The amount of LS engines that I've seen people just dingle ball hone with new rings and then go on to make gobs of power is hard to count. And surely those engines had questionable measurements lol.

  • Like 2
Posted
21 hours ago, newdude said:

318k?  Machine shop says it needs .040 over?  Does it really have to be pushed out that far or is the shop you picked not so well versed in the work they do?  

 

What was the exact cause of the low compression?  Bad rings?  

 

I'd be looking at a used engine or new engine at this point still.  

 

Is it true that GM discourages honing/glaze breaking during warranty piston replacement? Even up to 150K on the 2.4? No mention in 19-NA-036 for the 4.3 and either V8. Are they Nikasil lined? 

  • Like 1
Posted
21 hours ago, CamGTP said:

If the engine made it that far while being .032 thousandths out, I'd just do a .020 and now it'll only be .012 out, should get you many many more years.

 

The amount of LS engines that I've seen people just dingle ball hone with new rings and then go on to make gobs of power is hard to count. And surely those engines had questionable measurements lol.

The machine shop had actually suggested that themselves but said he couldn't stand behind how long it would last if we went that route.

Posted
3 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Is it true that GM discourages honing/glaze breaking during warranty piston replacement? Even up to 150K on the 2.4? No mention in 19-NA-036 for the 4.3 and either V8. Are they Nikasil lined? 

From what I've read on this forum, the 5.3 and 4.3 seem to have different liners.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • There's absolutely a mountain of profit in catering to the "I do my own research" crowd, people who are certain they know better. And I don't mean there isn't data to support that 0w40 produces less wear product than 0w20 in an engine like the 3.0 Duramax, that only feeds them the assurance they need. Again, my whole thing with oil selection is, sure, 0w40 or 0w30 produces less wear product. Are we talking the difference between the engine lasting only 100k versus 200k? Or are we talking more like, if the engine will already go 350k on a good 0w20 regimen recommended by the OE, is using 0w40 going to get us to 355k, assuming we can even get the rest of the truck to last that long, meanwhile sacrificing the first 5y, 100k in powertrain warranty. The answer isn't easy, there are tradeoffs.   I willfully use 0w20 Dexos D for this reason, knowing that a 0w40 will produce slightly less wear. I don't believe the delta in wear product is meaningful over the lifetime of the engine, and I place much more importance on driving style and overall feeding and care of the engine as a whole. It's the mentality that someone can abstain from alcohol their whole life which is an amazing boost to health by itself, theoretically. But if they're sedentary, that lifestyle choice will most likely kill them young despite their other, concerted efforts. Maybe someone doesn't drink AND they are the perfect picture of health and activity AND they use 0w40 AND they treat their engine perfectly. If living until 130 years is the goal, sure, do that. But it's going to be a really old truck falling apart around a good engine for that last 30 years, without a doubt.   I watched Demonworks' other video on the 100k+ 3.0 Duramax that had dealer 0w20 changes on what appears to be OLM-prescribed intervals (8-10k).   The QR codes are still present and readable on the main bearings. That's how little wear it has.   That's not proof that anyone else should stick to 0w20, but it's confirmation, for me, that 0w20 is perfectly acceptable to use in these engines.
    • 1Based on independent testing of OE 0W-20 in the Peugeot TU3M Wear Test as required by the dexos1 Gen 2 specification.
    • oh ya that's good to know - I would rather use a gear than the brakes down a long hill.  I would not let cruise control take over on snow or towing a trailer for sure on hills anyway.     The other thing about the CO trip was that was all done above 6K feet for the most part, so that has to use more gas as the motor is down a good amount of power up there.   If I drove my 2016 Camaro with a very similar V8 to this 6.6 it would probably get about 23-24 on the fast run up to NE.  But the premium fuel premium is steep here in CO, so it would still only save about $40 in overall costs for the round-trip.  And you sure can't carry much gear in a convertible camaro!
    • Got part #s of what you ordered vs what you got?  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...