Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2023 Silverado LTZ & Z71 package. The ride is OK and I live on a mountain with lots of curvy roads and would like a smoother pavement ride and less body roll.  I'm running 20" Wrangler Trail Runner tires. I was thinking of replacing the stock Rancho shocks with Bilstein 5100's or Fox 2.0 shocks.  From what I read the 5100's are stiffer and reduce body roll but the Fox shocks are better off road (do very little) and have a softer ride with more body roll.  I have les than 1k miles on the truck. Does this sound like I would gain much from the swap?  Any preference on shocks? Does anyone know if Chevy gives us a sway bar?

Posted

Your main difference is the fox's will be rebuildable down the road if you desire, but also at a cost of nee 5100s. Both valvings at the end of the day are pretty simialr. You would be happy with either. Just the fact your upgrading to a shock with nitro and vehicle specific valving is the big thing. 

Posted

The trucks have a front sway bar, but no rear bar. The sway bars effect the opposite end of the vehicle they are installed on. The front bar helps control the rear, but there's nothing on the rear to help control the front. Helwig is the only company I've seen that offers stock height or lifted sway bars front and rear. Belltech has bars but they seem to only be for lowered trucks. Sway bars will do WAY more for body roll than the shocks will. Tire sidewall stiffness also plays a role in how a vehicle handles. I know the OEM 20" Bridgestone AT's I put on a set of aftermarket wheels have more bounce and roll than the stock 20" Goodyear Territory MT's that came on my truck.

Posted

The Bilsteins and Eibachs are your best best.  I installed Eibachs around 20k miles and couldn't be any happier with the results. I have an extra/spare set of Eibach front shocks that I keep in the garage to replace the current Eibachs when they wear out, but I have approximately 80K miles on this set and they still feel like new.  

Posted

I'd also consider DSSV Multimatics. I added them to my 21' AT4 and they really work.

 

They are soft on the highway, almost like riding a magic carpet. But they permit very little body roll and zero pogo effect.

 

Off-road at speed they're great. Slower off-road they're better than stock for sure but the difference isn't as dramatic.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Bilsteins (#6112 on the front and 5100's on the rear"REALLY firmed up my ride and reduced body roll significantly.

The Bilstein 6112's on the front  are actually for me too firm for my daily driving, however when I am towing my 24' enclosed car hauler it feels way more "planted' and safe in mountain passes and corners.

The Ranchos that it came with were a VERY big surprise to me as to how crappy and easy to compress they were, I had no previous experience with that brand until this truck.

 

Posted
12 hours ago, Naughty Donkey Performance said:

Bilsteins (#6112 on the front and 5100's on the rear"REALLY firmed up my ride and reduced body roll significantly.

The Bilstein 6112's on the front  are actually for me too firm for my daily driving, however when I am towing my 24' enclosed car hauler it feels way more "planted' and safe in mountain passes and corners.

The Ranchos that it came with were a VERY big surprise to me as to how crappy and easy to compress they were, I had no previous experience with that brand until this truck.

 

What's really interesting is that the Rancho aftermarket shocks are really good, 100 times better than the crap put on the Z71 package.

  • Like 2
Posted
6 hours ago, Gangly said:

What's really interesting is that the Rancho aftermarket shocks are really good, 100 times better than the crap put on the Z71 package.

Wierd as I always had heard good things about them as well.

But yeah these ones I can compress easily with ONE hand and 20k miles on them.

Posted
1 hour ago, Naughty Donkey Performance said:

Wierd as I always had heard good things about them as well.

But yeah these ones I can compress easily with ONE hand and 20k miles on them.

I also removed all 4 Ranchos at 20K miles to replace them with Eibachs, and I was amazed how easily I could compress the Rancho shocks with very little effort.  Then again, both front shocks were leaking so that might be contributory.  Either way, I went with Eibach and have never looked back.  99k miles on the truck so far, 79K on the Eibachs, and they still drive like new, I couldn't be happier. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I vote for the Fox 2.0 coilovers and rear shocks.  I'm partial cause I just did them on mine and loved them on my previous truck. I have never used the Bilstein's so I can't compare the two. They are a whole different level than the stock Z71 Ranchos.  Here is mine Fox 2.0 coilovers preset at 2' and the rear with 2' blocks and Fox 2.0 shocks.  

 

 

Fox lift 2.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

They are more expensive but in my opinion I'm okay with that because they are rebuildable and higher quality to me.  My body roll is gone.  I doubt you'd notice the difference between these and Billsteins as far as body roll, unless you were racing the truck up Pikes Peak lol.  

Posted

Shocks do not control body roll. They influence the RATE of roll but not the amount. Put it on a skid pad and film it. If the spring is soft enough to hit the bump stop it will, no matter how much dampening is dialed in short of infinite. In esses you may have enough dampening that less travel v time has happened between changes of direction that it only 'appears' to have less roll.

 

Roll bars control body roll and they control the end they are installed on. Effectively they are torsion springs connecting the right-side tire to the left and visa versa. You can put so much bar in the car that on hard turn in you lift the inside rear tire making is 'appear' that the tail is wagging the dog. 

 

A damper should allow 90% of the total travel when hitting the worst bump in the circuit at a speed that is 90% of the fastest you plan to attack at. Bump stops are there when you guess wrong. 

 

The right spring is one that holds the shock at mid travel statically loaded at the preload that gives the proper ride height and satisfies the above paragraph. As truck are meant to be loaded and often are not, they are sprung too heavy for empty work. You cannot valve that out. You can improve it directionally, but it will never be 'right'. 

 

Most DIY builders flat ignore the physics and build to the wish or a look. If slicing and dicing the corners is your thing, then a lift is a major step in the wrong direction to meet the goal. If Bently comfort is your thing.... be prepared to lose some utility. There is no 'one size fits all perfectly'. 

  • Like 2
Posted
23 hours ago, Naughty Donkey Performance said:

Wierd as I always had heard good things about them as well.

But yeah these ones I can compress easily with ONE hand and 20k miles on them.

 

LOL, you compressed them one handed because your arms 💪 are the size of my calves🦵, I've seen your YT shock install.

  • Haha 2
Posted
14 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Shocks do not control body roll. They influence the RATE of roll but not the amount. Put it on a skid pad and film it. If the spring is soft enough to hit the bump stop it will, no matter how much dampening is dialed in short of infinite. In esses you may have enough dampening that less travel v time has happened between changes of direction that it only 'appears' to have less roll.

 

Roll bars control body roll and they control the end they are installed on. Effectively they are torsion springs connecting the right-side tire to the left and visa versa. You can put so much bar in the car that on hard turn in you lift the inside rear tire making is 'appear' that the tail is wagging the dog. 

 

A damper should allow 90% of the total travel when hitting the worst bump in the circuit at a speed that is 90% of the fastest you plan to attack at. Bump stops are there when you guess wrong. 

 

The right spring is one that holds the shock at mid travel statically loaded at the preload that gives the proper ride height and satisfies the above paragraph. As truck are meant to be loaded and often are not, they are sprung too heavy for empty work. You cannot valve that out. You can improve it directionally, but it will never be 'right'. 

 

Most DIY builders flat ignore the physics and build to the wish or a look. If slicing and dicing the corners is your thing, then a lift is a major step in the wrong direction to meet the goal. If Bently comfort is your thing.... be prepared to lose some utility. There is no 'one size fits all perfectly'. 

That is a great explanation!  I want to learn more and hear more about your real-world testing of these scientific truths with the specific coilovers and shocks the poster asked about.  In real world driving with most people in these trucks the rate of roll and rebound is more important that the total amount they can in 'esses" physically handle.  It's sway bars not "roll" bars and nobody is skid padding their 1/2 tons to test, nor cares about hitting bump stops on their 1/2-ton daily driver.  

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...