Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

First, let me start by saying that I'm not very mechanically inclined. 

 

My son (in the Army, out of state) has a 2014 Silverado 1500 with the 5.3 and 105,000 miles.  He had a loud rattle in the rear of the truck and took it to a repair shop.  Long story short, one of the lug nuts was off and rattling in the hub cap.  Before realizing that, the shop decided to check the transmission/TC to see if that was the issue.  They immediately said the fluid was nasty looking and needed to be flushed at best.  They prepared him an estimate and low and behold, it was to replace the transmission and TC for about $5,500.  He has had no issues with shuddering or slipping.  I told him to get the truck away from that place.

 

Now, after reading, I see that lots of these trucks have a common issue with the TC that leads to issues with the transmission, but he has had no problems....yet.  I told him to take it somewhere else and see about just getting the flush since the fluid looked so bad.  He called a couple of other places, including a couple of dealerships in his area and got mixed answers.  One said a flush and filter change was necessary, one said flush but doesn't recommend changing filter, one said they could do it but he's just putting off a bigger issue...even though he's had no problems.  Is it really just a matter of time before he has bigger issues?  Will the flush help prevent those issues?  Is it time to flush and then get rid of the truck????

 

Any advice?

Edited by jwoody28
Posted

My 2 cents.

Anybody's guess how long it will last. Clean fluid may help, may not. New fluid can be a mistake sometimes.

Why flush it to sell it? 

Posted

Nobody knows how long.  The flush would be just to buy him some time.  He's not in a position to trade it in right away...maybe a month or two.  If it is really that dirty it needs to be changed.  

Posted

I recently traded my 2015 w/ the 5.3L, 101k on the odo. I really had no issues with it except:

 

- I replaced the condenser for the A/C (known issue that they vibrate themselves to where they leak)

- I replaced the high pressure fuel pump (known problematic design where they can leak and fuel makes its way into the oil, CEL shows a 'rich' condition)

- The valve in the exhaust started squeaking under hard acceleration when it would come out of V4 mode and go into V8 mode - never did anything about it

- The high-mounted brake light leaked and I had some light water staining start in the rear of the cab - I replaced the foam gasket

 

I use a private mechanic for anything not under warranty. His take was that I was at a point where he would suggest I do the plugs, wires, transmission fluid flush, diff fluid change, and possibly brake fluid change as none of those had been done. I weighed that in combination with needing to put on tires before winter and decided to "spend that money" against a new truck instead.

 

For a frame of reference: I bought the truck new, towed with it a small amount, and was generally good about the services being done when needed or early. More highway miles on it early on, then that changed to more of a mix once I hit around 40-45k miles.

  • Like 1
Posted

It's a gamble for the most part.  I have done fluid exchanges on transmissions and they lasted a long time after. Then I have done the same on those like that with  over 100k miles and with in 5k miles they went out.  You just never know. 

 

Our 6L80 went at 82k, even though I did early fluid changes and installed a lower transmission thermostat.  To me GM's design  is bad, or their lowest bidder has a bad design on the TC's that are used.

 

I was at SEMA last week and all the torque converter companies I talked to said the same thing.  The GM TC is a bad unit from the start.  If you have good luck with it then great but what they see come into the shop shows the TC isn't designed well.  I guess just to get past the warranty is all that matters anymore.  The days of the everlasting turbo 400 and 350's are gone.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I imagine the cold winters up here with repeated short runs in town every day for those that live and work in town and given what I have come to learn on this forum with DI engines having fuel dilution issues, and if they don't change the oil until it says to but keep driving it for a while, I bet all that is just lovely on those finicky lifters. 
    • I just did some reading and Stabilitrak is more than a what I had originally thought. It is more of a vehicle control system to help the driver in precarious situations. I thought it was only the AWD system. Now I know. So I changed the title for this thread to AWD conversion to Z71 
    • Sounds like converting will be a bigger endeavor than I was thinking. This truck doesn't have 2Hi like the Suburban did. The Tahoe has 4Hi and 4Lo and a button to turn of traction control.   From what I understand the Stabilitrak uses open diff in the front and rear. When wheel speed is not the same the stabilitrak uses the ABS system to slowdown the spinning wheel(s) to transfer power to the slower non-spinning wheel(s). I thought the transfer case was open too. Being able to transfer power either more to front or rear depending on wheel spin. Maybe I miss understood some information with you saying and power transfer is 50-50. Thanks
    • My brother has a 2007 Avalanche with afm 5.3. It`s got 176,000 miles. Runs like a clock. Never been apart. Co worker has a 2010 Tahoe with afm 5.3. 230,000 miles. Never been apart. Runs like a clock. So, even though cyl deac is a weak spot, they can go the distance.   BUT, these engines had the oil changed regularly, AND had 5w30 as spec. I wonder if they would have lasted this far on 0w20? I`ll bet not.
    • I certainly could be wrong but I hear of pickups far newer than that 2007 cutoff which may not be going to the wrecker but are having engine work done and be that a reman engine or new engine or trying to repair the existing engine. Some of it would be design issues as per the cylinder deactivation system that GM has and one of those lifters wiping out the cam and the question of oil changes moving the needle or not on that whole mess, or in the case of Ford pickup engines that have the long timing chains and wearing them out and the roller followers and phasers and some of that certainly goes back to oil change intervals. But in those various cases the truck has all sorts of life left in it and so the unfortunate owner and may be original owner or used market owner that is pouring money into repairs so the truck is not seeing the salvage yard yet but damage is happening by infrequent oil changes. A friends son had bought a 2018 I think it is half ton GM and it had some sort of extended or used dealer warranty on it and of course the lifter issue bites and its rattling and so the dealer had to swallow the bill and was at least 7000.00 and I think they only replaced what they felt they had to replace so yeah, I can see that being a ticking time bomb in the not too distant future. Would frequent oil changes cure all these engineering "marvels", probably not but some engine designs have shown that they do much better if the oil is changed a lot more often then if the manufacturer service claims are followed. New trucks cost so much that there is an incentive to keep the existing truck on the road by repairing. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...