Jump to content

Arm Indentations on Top of Door Panel

MrLeadFoot
 Share

Recommended Posts

MrLeadFoot Enthusiast

MrLeadFoot

Posted
Posted

I'm not a big guy, I am 5'9" and 180 lbs. Sometimes I drive with my left elbow resting on the door panel and my left hand on the steering wheel. I noticed that this is leaving indentations if the foam on the top of the door panel. Over the summer, these indentations became worse, and took weeks to come back up, but now some of these indentations are not coming back up.  I can't believe I am actually having such an issue, as I've never seen this on any other vehicle I have ever owned. Questions:

 

1) Is anyone else experiencing this?

 

2) If I take this in to have them replace the door panel under warranty, will they swap the wood on my door panel to the new door panel so the wood still matches the rest of the vehicle? I ask this because I've noticed that all Denalis have different colored and grained wood, even when they have the same color interior as mine, understandably because since it's real wood it can't possibly the same in every vehicle.

 

3) Am I guaranteed to have rattles after a door panel swap?

 

4) What would you do, if you were in my shoes?

 

Thanks in advance.

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, MrLeadFoot said:

I'm not a big guy, I am 5'9" and 180 lbs. Sometimes I drive with my left elbow resting on the door panel and my left hand on the steering wheel. I noticed that this is leaving indentations if the foam on the top of the door panel. Over the summer, these indentations became worse, and took weeks to come back up, but now some of these indentations are not coming back up.  I can't believe I am actually having such an issue, as I've never seen this on any other vehicle I have ever owned. Questions:

 

1) Is anyone else experiencing this?

 

2) If I take this in to have them replace the door panel under warranty, will they swap the wood on my door panel to the new door panel so the wood still matches the rest of the vehicle? I ask this because I've noticed that all Denalis have different colored and grained wood, even when they have the same color interior as mine, understandably because since it's real wood it can't possibly the same in every vehicle.

 

3) Am I guaranteed to have rattles after a door panel swap?

 

4) What would you do, if you were in my shoes?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

 

1 - Not me.

 

2 - 50/50 on it being warrantied.  The dealer has to submit photos to GM for warranty pre-approval, so GM will determine an ok or a no go for it.

 

3 - Unlikely.  Door panels are straight forward.  I've had mine off on my 2022.5 to replace a broken outside mirror, no rattles.

 

4 - Stop resting your elbow there lol.  

asilverblazer Senior Enthusiast

asilverblazer

Posted
Posted

I don't put my elbow there as much as I would like to... I've had a slightly different issue. 

 

On my 2015 Sierra that I bought new, my wifes 2016 Yukon Denali we bought used and on my used 2018 Silverado, they all have had the finish on the top of the door panel where my elbow would go become compromised. It stays kind of sticky all the time, just in the one little area. I would have thought I got something on the door panel, but it has happened to three different trucks. I also don't wear any products or lotions on my arm either that would cause it.

 

Also have the water spotting issue on them too.

 

In addition to sticky gummy steering wheel control buttons...

redwngr Senior Enthusiast

redwngr

Posted
Posted

I've had the deformation issue on multiple GM vehicles.

Not just trucks. 

 

Guess we need to go back to having a painted steel panel in that location -- like in the 'good old days'--- LOL

Then we just get to ****** about the common issue of the paint wearing off.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
MrLeadFoot Enthusiast

MrLeadFoot

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I never had that happen on my 2000 Suburban over 235,000 miles, or on my 2001 Vette, which is at 145k miles now. I think the foam they starting using at some point sucks. It's crazy that an $80K vehicle has such an issue.

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, MrLeadFoot said:

I never had that happen on my 2000 Suburban over 235,000 miles, or on my 2001 Vette, which is at 145k miles now. I think the foam they starting using at some point sucks. It's crazy that an $80K vehicle has such an issue.

 

 

Those 00-06 Suburbans had hard ass panels too though.  Over the years the auto magazines griped and griped about door panel feel and quality, which in turn led to the OEMs making softer touch components so they "feel" better and "look" better but they don't wear anything like the old stuff did.  

 

And they all do it now.  Not really any avoiding it.  

MrLeadFoot Enthusiast

MrLeadFoot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 hours ago, Jus Cruisin said:

Isn't just the arm pad/rest replaceable? 

You must've misread the original post. It's not the armrest, it's the top of the door panel itself. They used some pretty crappy foam that collapses and doesn't come back. At first it does come back, after a few days, but if you rest your arm on it in hot weather, it can take weeks to come back. If you rest your arm often enough over time (a few weeks) it will collapse and never come back. Just so hard to believe that, based on the reply from @newdude, the would make them out of non-resilient foam. Begs the question, "What were they thinking?" On the other hand, since it's apparently been going on for so long, they must not really care. Or, they do it on purpose to try and get us to start thinking these $80K vehicles are disposable. (Conspiracy theorists, rejoice!) 🤣

MrLeadFoot Enthusiast

MrLeadFoot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, MrLeadFoot said:

You must've misread the original post. It's not the armrest, it's the top of the door panel itself. They used some pretty crappy foam that collapses and doesn't come back. At first it does come back, after a few days, but if you rest your arm on it in hot weather, it can take weeks to come back. If you rest your arm often enough over time (a few weeks) it will collapse and never come back. Just so hard to believe that, based on the reply from @newdude, they would make them out of non-resilient foam. Begs the question, "What were they thinking?" On the other hand, since it's apparently been going on for so long, they must not really care. Or, they do it on purpose to try and get us to start thinking these $80K vehicles are disposable. (Conspiracy theorists, rejoice!) 🤣

 

MrMagloo Enthusiast

MrMagloo

Posted
Posted

Fwiw, I have always rested my left elbow on the top of the door panel near the window on all my vehicles going back to the beginning of time.  This Silverado is a different animal and there is something about the contour and padding.  Shortly after I bought this '23 RST, I moved my daughter from Chicago to GA over a weekend, and it was pretty uncomfortable with my normal driving style with my elbow on the door panel, as the stock elbow rest is far too low.  I would put the elbow up there and after a while my arm would go numb, so I would move it for a bit.  I'd get my feeling back and do it again. After 1,800 miles round trip over that weekend, I got back and my arm was numb for months. The doctor said I pinched the nerve.  I'm just now starting to get my feeling back on my finger tips.  Something about the lack of decent padding and the sharper radius seems to be the cause.  No fun.  I ended up getting one of these things that solved the problem, but it's a little awkward as there is no solid mount.  https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0B1J81WZK/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

MrMagloo Enthusiast

MrMagloo

Posted
Posted

Whatever dent that might have been there is gone now. I didn't notice anything and I certainly don't rest my elbow there anymore. I just think it's crappy that these designers don't spend more time on the drivers ergo's, as resting both elbows is mission critical for longer hauls.

MrLeadFoot Enthusiast

MrLeadFoot

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Are the rest of you guys saying you don't ever rest your elbows on your door sills while driving, or are you saying you do periodically, but don't see indentations? Mine show clear depressions when I rest my arm up there, like resting on a cushion might, which makes me wonder if mine wasn't made right. That's what I'm trying to determine. 

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

It’s part of the wearing out process. I rest my arm there and the arm rest. They all get the indentation, every brand. I’ve even seen the steering wheel get stained or indents from holding it in one spot. As far as the arm rest and door panel. I use a pillow because my elbow gets sore. That also cures the indentation.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Another JR
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By Another JR · Posted

      Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • newdude
      Gas fill door

      By newdude · Posted

      Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • newdude
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By newdude · Posted

      No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...