Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just curious how many guys keep the service after it expires? I know they have different plans. I do enjoy the ability to lock/unlock and start the truck from my phone but I am not sure if I fully utilize everything else. My plan will be running out soon. Should I just get the cheap plan or dump it all together? Any tips on getting good deals?

Posted

I have kept onstar since 2004. Getting a break on my insurance and have used it several times. Once I left my dog in the truck with the motor running and she locked the doors when she hit the button. Had to call them to unlock the doors. My friend used them to track his stolen truck. The police had them turn the truck off and arrest the guy, no damage to the truck. 

  • Like 1
Posted

double check your build sheet if it came with connected service. I had my trial end and it ended the connected service feature that was part of the build sheet and I couldn't use the remote start, lock/unlock or any other commands from my phone and it also killed the AT&T 4g data on my 2023 RST. I called onstar and told them my truck was supposed to have the coverage for I think the build sheet said 3 years or 5 years something like that and they gave it to me along with 2 months of data connectivity. I've been testing turning off the data plan on my truck and use my mobile hotspot instead when my phone pairs up to the radio, data usage is pretty high for just driving around but it's typical mobile data usage for trip suggestions and traffic updates. I disabled auto map updates and auto app updates and run them usually every 2 weeks and it keeps everything working fine. With mobile hotspot it also gives me the ability to use the "hey google" feature to control everything like the temperature of the truck and what not. Without mobile hotspot or the AT&T plan for the truck you can use android auto by holding the mic button on the wheel for 5 seconds to use android auto's automation but it doesn't work as fantastic as the built in one with a data connection.

 

I know once my trial is totally gone I won't pay for onstar. The insurance break isn't anything more than $5 every 6 months for my premium which is a joke.

Posted (edited)

What you're essentially asking is how much value does OnStar have and does it line up with the cost of the subscription. Let me offer the following to consider:

 

OnStar has been around since something like the mid 90's. At the time, cell phones were still more of a luxury item than anything else so adding "telephone" services in the vehicle were of interest to many customers as it was FAR cheaper than getting a "car phone" installed. When cell phones became a mainstream thing, the phone service part lost some value. When -smartphones- became the norm, the data plans and turn-by-turn navigation became less valued. GM never changed their offering much, though. Same old tired services at rising prices.

 

Subscribership got so bad that GM changed the rules a few years ago and hard-bound three years of connected service into all vehicles and passed the cost along to the consumer. There was no way to opt out, and it was considered a factory-installed "option" that couldn't be removed so you couldn't argue the price of it. People still bought the vehicles, so GM decided to take away the mandatory service but still roll the price into the vehicle, increasing the margin on the vehicles.

 

They're likely still showing some of that revenue to support the OnStar business unit, but I'm willing to bet that their subscriber count is dropping again.

 

OnStar is a mostly redundant set of services compared to your smartphone at a monthly subscription price that is far too high for what little actual functionality you get.

Edited by ember1205
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I could very well be mistaken, but I believe GM was contractually obligated to continue OnStar subscription services in their vehicles.  As a result of dwindling/no consumer interest in the subscription, but with a contractual requirement to continue its use in their vehicles, they began to mandate the "option" in their vehicles and tie in the price of a subscription with the purchase price of the vehicle to be able to keep from loosing money on it. 

 

Honestly, how many people prefer OnStar's navigation over Google, Apple, Waze, etc.?  1 person in 1,000?  If you're involved in a crash and want emergency response contacted, Apple and Andriod have done this for a while now.  Other than emergency services, and navigation, the OnStar services are obsolete, and I would argue even those options are obsolete compared to what's readily available on our phones. 

 

The GM app is nice, and being able to track, unlock, and remote start from a distance, etc. is nice to have, but that should be standard on higher end models, and not linked to a subscription based software.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Gangly said:

The GM app is nice, and being able to track, unlock, and remote start from a distance, etc. is nice to have, but that should be standard on higher end models, and not linked to a subscription based software.

 

The app is largely useless. Aside from sending a control (lock, unlock, or start / cancel commands), it has little value. 


The tire pressure info is typically wrong as is the fuel level. Distance to empty is similarly often incorrect. The location data is not precise and this leads to problems in actually locating the vehicle if you need to. Most folks with a diesel are unable to see the DEF level. It won't tell you if the vehicle is currently locked or unlocked, running or not, etc.

 

The whole "Trusted Device" function they tried to add is largely worthless if you want CarPlay or Android Auto to work properly because launching either screen mirroring product kills the NFC functionality on the device to be able to auto-unlock your driver profile. The fact that they REQUIRE a driver profile now to make certain settings in the vehicle available (max volume at startup, for example) is another aberration on GM's part of genuinely not understanding how to write software. That's another whole topic to itself, though.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Phantom 4D said:

My 2023 came with 3 years of paid up ONSTAR with the mobile hot spot. 

That's what I am referring to.  I believe a severe decline in electing this as an option created a situation wherein GM made it "standard" on the purchase sheet now, and included it in the price of the purchase.

Edited by Gangly
Posted
1 hour ago, Phantom 4D said:

My 2023 came with 3 years of paid up ONSTAR with the mobile hot spot. 

And my 2024 cost at least as much as yours but I got none of that. They forced it down everyone's throat and showed the price. People bitched. They hid the price and removed the service. No more griping but the price of the truck didn't go down even though the actual service was removed.

 

Posted
7 hours ago, Phantom 4D said:

My 2023 came with 3 years of paid up ONSTAR with the mobile hot spot. 

My sticker shows 3 YEARS REMOTE ACCESS PLAN: ONSTAR AND WI-FI DATA CAPABLE.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,464 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
    • Do you have access to BP fuels? Some stations have Silver 91 E-0 priced the same as their 93 E-10.  There is a local Marathon with 90 alky free for $6 a gallon but I go down the road to BP for $5-ish. They also have a 100 E-0 but that stuff is $10 a pop. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...