Jump to content

2024 GMC SLT with the X31 package and 22 inch wheels

gmcsierra71
 Share

Recommended Posts

gmcsierra71 Enthusiast

gmcsierra71

Posted
Posted

GMC Website would not allow me to build an SLT with X31 package and 22 inch wheels. Therefore, i had to purchase SLT with X31 package and standard wheels, then upgrade wheels myself.

 

Original Picture listed first is my truck before any upgrades.


Then additional pictures with my additions:
  - 22 inch Chrome 6-SPLIT-SPOKE F0 wheels from ShopChevyParts.com (Part Number: 84799392)
  - Volcanic Red Tintcoat Fender Flare Set (GM Part # 85562045) from GMC Accessories wesbite
  - UnderCover ArmorFlex Bed Cover (Part Number: UDC-AX12022)
  - BEDRUG XLT Bed MatT (Part Number: RI-XLTBMC19CCMPS )
 

IMG_2666.jpg

IMG_2966.jpg

IMG_3648.jpg

IMG_3647.jpg

  • Like 2
Velocity12 Enthusiast

Velocity12

Posted
Posted (edited)

Looks great! I did the same thing minus the bed rug, and I put different OEM style wheels. I think the wheels that come on these trucks are horrible. Don’t think I’ve ever felt that way about any other gm wheel. And flares should come painted on the Denali ans SLT trims. 

IMG_4724.jpeg

IMG_4751.jpeg

IMG_4750.jpeg

Edited by Velocity12
tbare54 Enthusiast

tbare54

Posted
Posted

You could have saved yourself probably $10,000 by going Silverado LTZ and gotten Z71 package, with factory bed coating and 20 inch shinny wheels.

 

17226745-9DD6-40C9-8E84-CF23F210C7F3.jpeg

Swamp Dweller Enthusiast

Swamp Dweller

Posted
Posted

Bought mine like you are talking about. A guy wanted an Ultimate Denali, but liked the SLT wheels and tires better, so they changed them out. I bought this truck because it had the Denali 22's.....among lots of other things.

IMG_0215.JPG

IMG_0217.JPG

  • Like 1
Velocity12 Enthusiast

Velocity12

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, tbare54 said:

You could have saved yourself probably $10,000 by going Silverado LTZ and gotten Z71 package, with factory bed coating and 20 inch shinny wheels.

 

17226745-9DD6-40C9-8E84-CF23F210C7F3.jpeg

For my area that’s not the case. A similarly equipped Silverado is just a couple thousand cheaper at most. I like the Sierra better and it’s easier to find the options and packages I want in the Sierra where I live. Personally, I really didn’t want the X31 package but this truck had other things I wanted and I liked the color. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • James Beyer
      Trading 7.3 (Godzilla) for G.M.C gas

      By James Beyer · Posted

      Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • KARNUT
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By KARNUT · Posted

      It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...