Jump to content

Wireless charging

Phantom 4D
 Share

Recommended Posts

Phantom 4D Enthusiast

Phantom 4D

Posted
Posted

New Samsung S24U won't charge wirelessly. I put it in the slot, it shows charging for a few seconds then goes to the yellow warning triangle. Tried without the Otter Box cover, no help. My S21U didn't have that problem. Anyone else with the S24U have this problem?

Jay P Enthusiast

Jay P

Posted
Posted

Does it charge wireless in another vehicle or at home? How discharged was the battery when you tried? Most new phones use optimized charging so they may not charge past 80% to increase battery life. While I don't have a Samsung phone, our 23 Tahoe will charge both my iPhone and the wife's iPhone just fine as long as they are discharged below 75%.

  • Like 1
NavyVette Enthusiast

NavyVette

Posted
Posted

As far as I am concerned, wireless charging in these refresh trucks is useless.

 

Unless you have the ONE phone GM used to design the system, which is probably the first phone that ever had wireless charging and has not been made for ten years your phone will not sit in the massively oversized slot correctly.

 

You will need to find out how high off the bottom of the slot and how close to centered you have to be to get a solid charge, and then make an adapter to fill up the excess space to have any chance of it ever working.

 

My current best setup is 1/2 inch from the bottom and evenly centered, charging port down, screen up, on my Samsung Z Fold 4, but it's not foolproof.

I may buy some of these and use one for a month to make sure it's a solid place, then have someone 3d print me a filler.

https://www.amazon.com/Dashboard-Removable-Silicone-Anti-Slip-Non-Slip/dp/B09NNRWNVK

  • Like 1
bobder41 Enthusiast

bobder41

Posted
Posted

in my 2024 1500 using my s24 phone , I have to slide it into the charging pad on my console with the top of the phone facing the rear of the truck, face up. this works on 2 out of 3 s24 phones. The 3rd one the case is too thick to waork on any wireless charger.

Hope this helps 

  • Like 1
Phantom 4D Enthusiast

Phantom 4D

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 6/17/2024 at 5:04 PM, Jay P said:

Does it charge wireless in another vehicle or at home? How discharged was the battery when you tried? Most new phones use optimized charging so they may not charge past 80% to increase battery life. While I don't have a Samsung phone, our 23 Tahoe will charge both my iPhone and the wife's iPhone just fine as long as they are discharged below 75%.

My Sierra is the only vehicle we have with wireless charging. At home we use a standard charger. My previous S21 worked fine. My wife's S21 does as well. First try with the S24U it was at 62% charge. Thanks for the info. 

Haufski762 Enthusiast

Haufski762

Posted
Posted

Depends on the phone, the placement of the phone and the phone case. If I keep my case on, it won't charge. If I remove it, it will charge.

  • 3 weeks later...
G$$Money Enthusiast

G$$Money

Posted
Posted

I had this fixed in my truck. Go to the dealer with the no wireless charge complaint. There is a service bulletin about it. There are several different modules that can only be identified by disassembling the entire center console and getting to the bottom of the wireless module. If it's the first type, they replace it. If it's the second type, it is the correct hardware and it needs a software update to charge Samsung phones. If it's the third one, there is another problem. Mine got the software update and has been working since without issue on a s23ultra. If you look at my previous posts

, you should see the bulletin number to give to the dealer if they can't find it for some reason.

  • 2 months later...
brassnutz New Member

brassnutz

Posted
Posted

BOBDER41 YOU ARE THE MAN! I just bought a s24 ultra and I work at the damn GM dealership as a salesman, I never thought about trying that but it worked perfectly. Thank you very much ! 

  • 2 months later...
DubVBenz Enthusiast

DubVBenz

Posted
Posted
On 6/17/2024 at 3:21 PM, Phantom 4D said:

New Samsung S24U won't charge wirelessly. I put it in the slot, it shows charging for a few seconds then goes to the yellow warning triangle. Tried without the Otter Box cover, no help. My S21U didn't have that problem. Anyone else with the S24U have this problem?

 

My S23U would usually charge , but my new S24U does the same behavior that you describe. I need to check it without my case on, but on the S23 you could move the phone around a little and find the sweet spot/orientation for charging. I haven't found the same with the S24 Ultra.

Jus Cruisin Enthusiast

Jus Cruisin

Posted
Posted (edited)

I must have super - charger in my Denali Ultimate. I have a Samsung S22 Ultra and S24 Ultra and both immediately start charging with silicone cases. Top toward front. 

Edited by Jus Cruisin
MTY55 Enthusiast

MTY55

Posted
Posted

My 23 Denali has been hit and miss with my Pixel 7 pro. I got used to cursing at it and adjust it couple times then it seems to locks in.

  • 1 year later...
Edward Gudusky New Member

Edward Gudusky

Posted
Posted
On 7/10/2024 at 2:48 PM, G$$Money said:

I had this fixed in my truck. Go to the dealer with the no wireless charge complaint. There is a service bulletin about it. There are several different modules that can only be identified by disassembling the entire center console and getting to the bottom of the wireless module. If it's the first type, they replace it. If it's the second type, it is the correct hardware and it needs a software update to charge Samsung phones. If it's the third one, there is another problem. Mine got the software update and has been working since without issue on a s23ultra. If you look at my previous posts

, you should see the bulletin number to give to the dealer if they can't find it for some reason.

This post is exactly what I need! Thanks! I am going to try this with my dealership. I have a 2022.5 Sierra Denali and have this charging problem on my Samsung S25 Ultra and iPhone 15 Pro Max. I am out of bumber to bumber warranty but have an extended warranty. I will report back with my findings...

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • contrabombarde
      2010 Avalanche 5.3 not running correctly after engine swap.

      By contrabombarde · Posted

      Apologies in advance, this is a long post, there's a lot to explain.   A friend had a 2010 Avalanche with a 5.3 (LMG) that blew the head gaskets (amount other problems). He gave me a donor motor out of a 2007 suburban (LC9). I got it all installed, and everything hooked up. Went to go start it, and it stumbled a bit at first and died a couple times, but after trying a few times it sounded like it was running very well. Went out to go get some coolant, and came back the next day.    Upon trying to start it, the truck will crank and fire normally and the RPMs will raise to around 1,200 or 1,500, sounding great, and then the RPMs will decrease and it will just die. Repeat that a dozen or two dozen times, and eventually it will fire and idle beautifully. As soon as you touch the throttle, it will start misfiring and sound like absolute trash. When you let off the throttle it will come down and hunt around shaking and misfiring like crazy. A message will come up on the dash saying reduced engine power.    It is throwing codes for a map sensor circuit voltage High, as well as MAF sensor low frequency. With key on engine off, the map sensor reads about 4.8 volts on the vout pin, which the PCM interprets as about 17.8 PSI, contrasted to the barometer which my scan tool tells me reads about 13.5 PSI. However, once the engine starts and is idling this reading drops to about 5-6 PSI at a stable idle, and varies significantly when the engine is misfiring/ hunting like I said before. I should note that I used the intake and MAP sensor from the LC9 engine. I changed the connector on the 2010 harness to The 2007 connector. The pinouts for the sensors were printed right on the top, and I triple-checked that I put the correct wire into the correct place.   On the other hand, the MAF sensor reads consistently 0.0 g/s regardless of State. I have pulled my hair out trying to figure out this last detail. I have tried three different sensors, (all of which should be good, one of which was new), I have verified all the wiring from the sensor going back to the PCM, and have verified that the readings at the PCM are the same readings as at the sensor itself. The intake air temperature sensor is also functioning as normal. I verified all the voltages and grounds etc, and everything is as it should be. I don't have an oscilloscope to verify, but I probed with my multimeter (Klein mm720) on frequency Mode, and it reads that on initial cranking, the maf is producing between 3000 and 7000 HZ, and as soon as the engine fires that falls off to below, 1000, and if the engine continues to run, it will produce somewhat erratic readings between 5 and 100-200 HZ. It does increase notably when the engine is revved despite the misfirings. As I said before, I have verified all of the wires going to the PCM, and I have tried multiple known good sensors. I've tested all the pins and voltages from the sensor and verified them against the manual that they are what they should be. I tested all the wiring for both ohms and voltage drop, and everything tested fine. Like I said I tested at the sensor as well as right at the PCM, everything checked out.   The only other thing of note at least I think is the fact that the engine originally in the truck had VVT, but the engine I put in, the lc9, does not have VVT. I modified the cam sensor plug to work. I reference the wiring diagrams and double-checked that I modified the harness correctly to adapt it. There is obviously a code for the VVT solenoid, but I don't think that's the cause of my problems, and this friend will probably have the PCM sent off to tune out the codes at some point.   I'm writing this for my bed so I don't recall the exact codes, but I'll update the post tomorrow morning with the exact codes. And ideas or feedback much appreciated. 
    • Atlas
      Tire psi

      By Atlas · Posted

      It's possible the two trucks are using different body control modules which is why yours works and the OP's doesn't.   So much in these newer vehicles depends on model/trim configurations, production date. They don't all use the same modules like back in the day.
    • Chuck FB
      Tire psi

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I forgot to answer the question as per what market mine is set to and yes I finally found that area on mine and yes its also set to America.   So here's something I realized as I wasn't looking at that part in the Sierra section until now, your right that what I see here as choice 3 under Sierra which says 07/2023-06/2026 ( 433 MHz 13542523 ) it has no choice 5 for tire pressure selection. Where as it does under the Chev choice. However I kept going down the list within the Sierra and I am really wondering if choice 9 will work for your truck as it has the same model number and hertz sensor as my truck. I would say try that choice first, if that doesn't work then jump over to the Chev section and again choose that same model and hertz choice as for some reason the Chev section gives the choice 5 of tire type/pressure selection for going back a number of years. Could very well be an Autel thing that they just didn't get the updates all done properly under Sierra but anyway first try that selection 9 I suggested under Sierra and then go from there. 
    • B07
      Anyone have a spare?

      By B07 · Posted

      Looking for this piece that holds the hose clamp in place. I have the hose clamp just not that other piece. Dealers and wrecking yards in my area will not sell just that piece. They want you to buy the whole air tube $100 +/- to get that $5 part.  that piece isn't molded to the air tube as I looked at my friends truck. It's held on by a screw and nut. I'm trying to put the OEM parts on the truck as the previous owner butchered things up installing an aftermarket CAI. It really looked homemade. 🤣 Thanks
    • Chuck FB
      Tire psi

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      Ok I missed that part that yours is a GM. The strange part is that the choice for year ranges and within the year of 2026 is different on the Sierra then on the Chev for some reason as I am looking at my tool at the Sierra choices. Now I am guessing you see as to your sensor part number as it may be different on your truck for some reason and a call to GM should get you the part model number of the sensors you should have as well as which MHz your sensors are. I know mine are the ones as per what I listed but there are other choices in the Autel and got me wondering if by some chance they put different ones in your truck. Having said that, did you try using each of the choices starting from No 1 and going on down the list, not sure if that would mean shutting off the engine each time and resetting the tool and going at it again each time. Also I thought of something else which may sound retarded but if there was some stupid chance that the chev choice would work. The reason I say that is that the Sierra is showing a range up to 06/2026 for the various choices of sensors it could be where as the Chev has one choice that has that 12/2026. By the way it is possible to not run the truck and you may know that as per not pressing the brake but pressing and holding the start button for a few seconds and it lights up the dash ( its called service mode ) but that sucks battery power and if it were me doing it that way I would be throwing on a decent sized battery charger before doing it that way as killing your battery won't make you happy at me at all !.    Like I say, just a thought to try the Chev choices if you have already exhausted the Sierra choices but first it would be nice to know for sure what exact sensor model and hertz your truck uses as I assume only those choices that mention the sensor would work unless a choice that does not mention the sensor model would somehow work. Its frustrating when one is trying to use tools like this without the experience of the tool and the vehicle, as I am sure dealer techs themselves struggle with it when starting out or a new model year comes along that is slightly different. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...