Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

'17 GMC Sierra 1500, installing RC 5" bracket lift.  Kit comes with RC N3 shocks, I don't plan to use them.  I have the Eibach Stage 2 kit.  Eibach rear shocks only allow for +0-1.5" of lift.

 

I know I can use rear shock extenders like this but wouldn't that create a problematic pivot point?

 

image.png.34e47a5c209367ba585a0d22fc5bce15.png

Edited by 17Sierra1500
Posted

I wouldn't do it but, that's just me.
Back in the late 70s when I had a 10" lift on my Chevy Short bed Scottsdale, I tried a spring lift with extensions on the rear leaf springs front and rear.
It wandered about dangerously.
I removed the front pivot point and had the springs arced for the lift I wanted.
YMMV but I wouldn't chance it, as I mentioned.
Any additional pivot point allows, well, an additional pivot point.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, MikeBMW said:

I wouldn't do it but, that's just me.
Back in the late 70s when I had a 10" lift on my Chevy Short bed Scottsdale, I tried a spring lift with extensions on the rear leaf springs front and rear.
It wandered about dangerously.
I removed the front pivot point and had the springs arced for the lift I wanted.
YMMV but I wouldn't chance it, as I mentioned.
Any additional pivot point allows, well, an additional pivot point.

 

I see what you are saying and would agree in an instant IF both planes of the fasteners were the same. But as the picture shows, the cross plane cancels the addition to nothing more than what was there to begin with. Does that make sense? 

  • Like 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

I see what you are saying and would agree in an instant IF both planes of the fasteners were the same. But as the picture shows, the cross plane cancels the addition to nothing more than what was there to begin with. Does that make sense? 

If a shock, or a spring, moves in more than one direction, it will cause stability issues.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, MikeBMW said:

If a shock, or a spring, moves in more than one direction, it will cause stability issues.

 

 

Okay, didn't see that like that but on closer look. Yea, I see your point. I'd tack weld that lower mount to the bracket. That would end that noise. 

 

Know what else is a stinker? A shock not in mid stroke. Running a stock length shock with a lift or lower is just that. 

 

Now, having said that, the factory setup on a pickup is always biased to the extension when unloaded. On right when fully loaded. When I did Pepper, I lowered the back to be in mid stroke and never carry more than 500 in the box....ever. Just like a car. 

 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Thanks for the replies!  I ended up buying a RC "Denali / Magnaride" rear shock kit 188BOX9.  It was designed to be used on as 5" lift with the OEM rear magnaride shocks.  Luckily, this kit has shock extensions with an additional anchor point, as to not allow the extension bracket to pivot.  Working good.  

Edited by 17Sierra1500
  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Whoever greenlighted the work truck matte black front bumpers on every trim but the AT4X should be fired!  I was hoping that was an AI mistake, but just realized they were on every model of the 2027 Silverado too.     Some parts of the interior do look premium, but the Denali Ultimate dashboard looks like an afterthought.  At least they appear to have lost the microfiber the high end Silverado models showed, but the '27 High Country dash looks better than the Denali.  
    • New member here. I am researching a read-first event-recorder concept for late-model GM V8 trucks. This is not a sales post. There is no product link, price, preorder, or mailing list. I am trying to determine whether the underlying problem is real before building anything.   Has your truck ever had a brief problem such as: - rough running or a momentary misfire - an oil-pressure warning or unusual pressure event - reduced power or a brief stall - a U-code or lost-communication problem - a symptom that disappeared before the dealer or independent shop could reproduce it   If so, I would appreciate the following details: - year, model, engine, and mileage - what happened and under what conditions - whether a DTC and useful freeze-frame data were stored - whether the shop was able to reproduce it - what the eventual confirmed repair was, if known - what additional information would have helped the diagnosis   The concept being evaluated is a removable leave-in recorder that continuously retains a rolling window from before and after an event. It would not tune, reflash, clear codes, or change the vehicle calibration.   I am also not claiming that it could predict lifter failure or see every internal ECM variable.   The real question is whether continuous event history would add enough useful evidence beyond freeze frame, GDS2, and existing scan tools — or whether it would simply be another unnecessary gadget.   For owners and technicians, which problem would make something like this genuinely useful: 1. intermittent misfire or AFM/DFM-related behavior 2. oil-pressure events 3. lost communication or electrical faults 4. none of the above Please be blunt. Negative feedback is just as useful as positive feedback.
    • No tears over the SLE and SLT trim levels disappearing but I kind of loathe the "Elevation" name. It's a truck--skip the elegance.   The slab-dashboard design is decidedly different. Almost has a Hummer flavor to it. "Professional Grade" seems to be leaning very white-collar, tech-driven these days moreso than blue-collar, functional design.   The Silverado would be my choice between the two new trucks. Pleased with the engine lineup in both. The GMC is a little "too much" for a truck, IMO, and the Denali borders on ridiculous - but I do know there are buyers for luxury trucks out there. It's just not my speed.
    • Your safety is of utmost importance, @joshua1221, and we understand the importance of having all your lights working in your truck. If you have not already, we highly encourage you to bring your concerns to the attention of your local GM dealer. They are in the best position to diagnose your concerns as well as confirm the compatibility of the mirrors with your truck. Additionally, we would like the opportunity to explore any way we may be of assistance. When you have a moment, please visit: https://s.gm.com/support-request and fill out the support request form with all pertinent details. This form helps our team gather the right information and ensures your request is routed appropriately.
    • - I like the outside but not as much as the Chevrolet.  They ICE'd the EV styling and it works, but I think exterior goes to Chevy on this one.     - SLE and SLT dead = Not.  Surprising.  Fits into the rest of the GMC lineup like this which (aside from Pro) matches the rest of the family.  Elevation, AT4, Denali.     - Interior.  Sophisticated Malaise era.  Why do I say Malaise?  Drawn with a ruler.  Rectangles everywhere.  Looks very premium though.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...