Jump to content

Which engine - 5.3, 6.2 or 3.0?

Z71RAD88
 Share

Recommended Posts

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
Posted

I'm moving forward with a new truck purchase in the next few weeks and struggling to decide which engine to go with. I live in CA and don't tow. Typically drive 20,000 per year. My typical commute is 35 miles each way with 90% country roads at 55 mph and freeway at 65 mph, a combo of the two. I do get up the mountains frequently so the extra torque from the 6.2 and 3.0 appease me. I do understand having the turbo will be helpful at elevation compare to a NA engine. 

 

I was initially all set on the 6.2 but with the recent notice from NHTSA, It's got me thinking twice. 

 

Never owned a diesel and don't feel overly confident I can feed it the proper/required diesel living in California. 

 

What would you all go with? Trim level wise going RST or LTZ. Deals seem to be better on the LTZ with the 3.0. 

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

newdude
newdude

Is it though?  I can reset my trip meter and drive 7 miles and get the same result.  That's not an accurate measurement of MPG, what it can achieve in a 7 mile stretch.        

Transient
Transient

I see that you ordered your truck before I was able to post my experience.  Imo, you made the right choice getting the 3.0 Duramax.  I have a 2020 with the 6.2 and lived in San Diego from 2020 to 2023

newdude
newdude

41mi.  Doesn't count.  Show us what you get on a tank or current lifetime MPG, that counts.  

Posted Images

N715DP Enthusiast

N715DP

Posted
Posted

I have a 3.0 and 16,000 miles later I am still amazed at the fuel efficiency over my 5.3 Avalanche I had previously.  I know gas prices are a different world on your side of the country but I ran a spreadsheet for almost 15,000 miles and came up with about 30% more cost efficient across all types of driving versus my Avalanche.  I see a roughly 50% increase in fuel economy so the 30% number takes into account the higher cost of diesel versus regular unleaded.  At typical highway speeds (I don't drive more than 70mph typically), I'm at more than 31mpg.  Around town is about 22mpg.  I know you mentioned not towing, but apples to apples towing, I was right on 50% more mpg with the same load over the same trip.

 

One thing I did not calculate is DEF usage but to be honest, it's so minimal of an expense that it's not worth factoring in.  

 

I think you'd find the fuel economy for your typical commute would be fantastic in the 3.0... I have the older 3.0 in my refreshed '22 and I've only heard that the newer is better in every way (including more power).

 

As for trim, I'm very happy with my Z71 RST, just enough bells and whistles without being a sticker shock situation.

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, N715DP said:

I have a 3.0 and 16,000 miles later I am still amazed at the fuel efficiency over my 5.3 Avalanche I had previously.  I know gas prices are a different world on your side of the country but I ran a spreadsheet for almost 15,000 miles and came up with about 30% more cost efficient across all types of driving versus my Avalanche.  I see a roughly 50% increase in fuel economy so the 30% number takes into account the higher cost of diesel versus regular unleaded.  At typical highway speeds (I don't drive more than 70mph typically), I'm at more than 31mpg.  Around town is about 22mpg.  I know you mentioned not towing, but apples to apples towing, I was right on 50% more mpg with the same load over the same trip.

 

One thing I did not calculate is DEF usage but to be honest, it's so minimal of an expense that it's not worth factoring in.  

 

I think you'd find the fuel economy for your typical commute would be fantastic in the 3.0... I have the older 3.0 in my refreshed '22 and I've only heard that the newer is better in every way (including more power).

 

As for trim, I'm very happy with my Z71 RST, just enough bells and whistles without being a sticker shock situation.

 

Thank you for your post! What kind of diesel do you have in PA? 

Silverado4x4 Senior Enthusiast

Silverado4x4

Posted
Posted

The 5.3 now and the 5.3 in your older Avalanche is not a good comparison in mpg. My 5.3 on a 650 mile trip got 25-27 mpg and around town it gets about 18- 20 mpg and iam not that easy on the peddle, yes the diesel will get a little better but you have to figure in the up charge for the diesel.

 

N715DP Enthusiast

N715DP

Posted
Posted

Standard ultra-low sulfur diesel is everywhere here (I think this is the same you'd have in CA).  In the winter, most stations switch to a winterized blend of #1 and #2 but I haven't noticed any difference in fuel economy or how the engine runs.  I typically fill up at one of the truck stops a few miles away as their prices are consistently less than your run-of-the-mill convenience store.  

 

 

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, Silverado4x4 said:

The 5.3 now and the 5.3 in your older Avalanche is not a good comparison in mpg. My 5.3 on a 650 mile trip got 25-27 mpg and around town it gets about 18- 20 mpg and iam not that easy on the peddle, yes the diesel will get a little better but you have to figure in the up charge for the diesel.

 

 

What year Silverado do you have in your 5.3 and trim level? And I would agree, the 5.3 with the 10 speed is a night and day difference compare to the 2004 and 2012 I had. 

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, N715DP said:

Standard ultra-low sulfur diesel is everywhere here (I think this is the same you'd have in CA).  In the winter, most stations switch to a winterized blend of #1 and #2 but I haven't noticed any difference in fuel economy or how the engine runs.  I typically fill up at one of the truck stops a few miles away as their prices are consistently less than your run-of-the-mill convenience store.  

 

 

 

We have very few #2 diesel stations left in the state from my research. It's all bio or renewable diesel. The owners manual states you can run up to B20 but it's recommended to use a condition or fuel additive with it. 

Silverado4x4 Senior Enthusiast

Silverado4x4

Posted
Posted

My other 5.3 was a 2019 with the 8 speed and I replaced it with a 2025 5.3 with the 10 speed, the 2025 hasn't been on that trip yet so iam expecting a little more but honestly I don't worry about mpg.

N715DP Enthusiast

N715DP

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, Z71RAD88 said:

 

We have very few #2 diesel stations left in the state from my research. It's all bio or renewable diesel. The owners manual states you can run up to B20 but it's recommended to use a condition or fuel additive with it. 

Hooray for the People's Republic of California! 🤣

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, PunchT37 said:

My ‘25 LT 2wd 5.3 with 3.42 gears has done this, at least at times. 
 

 

E36D1F76-2641-419B-94D2-A9312AF38EE2.jpeg

 

Wow. Impressive. Thanks for sharing. 

redwngr Senior Enthusiast

redwngr

Posted
Posted

My '23 3.0L has done this -- for 28,000 miles. 

This is all fuel used. 

Hand calc numbers are a little better than the DIC numbers. 

Lifetime average is at 29.2 usmpg.

 

image.png.9ccd2c72c11b3124374136aeb977b378.png

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, redwngr said:

My '23 3.0L has done this -- for 28,000 miles. 

This is all fuel used. 

Hand calc numbers are a little better than the DIC numbers. 

Lifetime average is at 29.2 usmpg.

 

image.png.9ccd2c72c11b3124374136aeb977b378.png

 

The 3.0 fuel mileage is absolutely unreal. Glad GM still has this as an offering in the half ton market. 

Z45 Senior Enthusiast

Z45

Posted
Posted

My last 3 trucks, '12, 17 and 21 were all 6.2l.  My 2024 I got the 3.0L diesel for the fuel economy.  I have 2 friend who bought earlier versions, 2020 and a 2021, both GMC's and they tell me no complaints. Granted this owners have kept their trucks stock, no suspension lifts or big tires. Like me they have them for basic transportation.

 

 

2024 GMC Sierra Denali Window Stikcer.pdf

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,972
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Whit.the.COB
    Newest Member
    Whit.the.COB
    Joined

  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,242 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      TCM Tuning 6L80E

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      I did the new thermostat after doing a 'flip' for a year. Runs as cool one way as the other in the summer but in the winter there is a bit of a floor. Yellow with the new 70 C thermostat. My data over the life of the unit to date. Still need more cooler. Anyway that floor helped both winter fuel economy and shift quality in the winter. I found it a good balance.       
    • Grumpy Bear
      Food & Drink

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Evan Williams Bottled in Bond   So pouring the last of a bottle of Evan Williams Black label last night I set off the the state store for a refill only to be denied the by an empty shelf. Rats.    What the did have was a bottle of Evan Williams Bottled in Bond. 100 proof. Hum, a few bucks more but a known distiller. Lets have a swing at it. ( I have before )    Cracked it open and pour a serving over ice. Hum.... more heat, yes. More alcohol naturally. But the barreling not the proof brings the taste and this one came up short.    Oh is was familiar but the heat ran the barrel over like a Peterbilt runs over a squirrel. Could use a heavier toasting of the oak me thinks or perhaps a longer barreling. Who knows. But what I can say is ice or a water back isn't the answer. What kills one kills them both. Sad. It is a pleasant drink....if you have little to compare it to.  
    • Grumpy Bear
      Bridgestone vs Goodyear tires?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      I've had exactly one set of Bridgestone. Lasted five year and 125,000 miles and had I known better 15oK would have been a cake walk. I would have bought a like set had they not tripled in price since the first set. I removed them at said mileage with 5/32" remaining in dead even wear all four. They were fuel efficient, quite, comfortable and predictable.    Early on I got a very good alignment checked at least once a year, sometimes twice; kept the tires properly inflated, balanced and rotated. And I've found that many a tire issue can be avoided with great maintenance practices. Lot's of tire dealers will do rotation and balance (simple) for free for as long as you own the tire they sold you so no excuse not to.    Bead prep, alloy integrity and stem health have a huge impact on inflation stability. There are more mountings done poorly that perfectly. Finding a good tire guy is gold and as important as finding a tire you like.    That 3X price increase now two sets of "other tires' later is starting look like a bargain.      Bad maintenance kills more tires than bad tires. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Atlas, you kill me As aggravating as a project like this can be you have been unable to hide your fascination with learning and using that angst against this beast like a Ninjitsu Master. It amuses you, admit it now.      BTW, love your writing style. 😉       
    • TrueBlue
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By TrueBlue · Posted

      I gotta say, I'm enjoying your narration. The troubles you've been having are amusing as you describe them. It's good to see that you're finally getting some satisfaction out the old beast though.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...