Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, Jus Cruisin said:

I'm figuring if I don't like it I'll swap out a little early. I just wish the 6.2l would get warrantied in a timely fashion if they do go south. 

Exactly! The lead time of an engine replacement is what’s keeping me away from the 6.2. 

Posted
20 hours ago, Transient said:

I see that you ordered your truck before I was able to post my experience.  Imo, you made the right choice getting the 3.0 Duramax.  I have a 2020 with the 6.2 and lived in San Diego from 2020 to 2023.  Diesel prices were either the same or slightly lower than 91 octane.  It's the mpg that makes the difference.  Iirc, Costco is a Top Tier Fuel Diesel provider.  Otherwise, GM recommends getting their additive whenever you fill up.  The current 3.0 produces more torque than the 6.2.  Both engines also use the same trans.  As such, they're very similar in 1/4 mile times (according to TFL Truck).  Best I ever saw in mpg with the 6.2 is 24.4 mpg.  That was a drive from San Diego to Las Vegas with the cruise set at 78mph.  Like you, I was torn on which engine to get.  I have been very happy with the 6.2, but sad that I didn't get the 3.0 (COVID and empty car lots played a factor in my purchase).  The biggest dis/satisfaction factor is how frequently I have to fill the tank.  If I could do it again I'd get the 3.0, but if I had the 3.0 I'd probably say I'd get the 6.2.


thanks! It’s been weeks since I was torn on my engine selection and decided to “split the difference” if you will and going 5.3. 

Posted
9 hours ago, Jus Cruisin said:

I'm figuring if I don't like it I'll swap out a little early. I just wish the 6.2l would get warrantied in a timely fashion if they do go south. 

My 6.2 has been flawless.  2020 model year.  That $2,500 upcharge does appear to get you a nice butt kissing though.  Just look at the valve spring replacement plan GM had in place for the 5.3 vs the 6.2.

Posted (edited)

Again, I'm not saying there isn't an elevated chance of an issue with the 6.2, but just took a 1200 mile round trip vacation with the wife and passed countless of them.  Not a single one blown up and sitting on the side of the road...just saying.  And mine ran flawless too.

 

Edited by JeffKirk
Posted
5 hours ago, JeffKirk said:

Again, I'm not saying there isn't an elevated chance of an issue with the 6.2, but just took a 1200 mile round trip vacation with the wife and passed countless of them.  Not a single one blown up and sitting on the side of the road...just saying.  And mine ran flawless too.

 

No question that the vast majority are in fact troublefree but since I've downsized from 3 daily drivers to one, I don't have a fallback driver for weeks and maybe months because the engines are on galactic backorder. Stuff breaks and that's what warranties are for but the repairs should be completed in a timely fashion. 

Posted

Just wanted to thank everyone for their thoughts, comments and input. I drove my new pickup home yesterday, which ended up being a 5.3. I was pleasantly surprised how well the 10 speed changes that engine from what I remembered of my 2012. Very smooth shifts on flat ground and it never really felt like it struggled going up some of the small mountain passes on my way back home. Always seem to be in the right gear. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Z71RAD88 said:

Just wanted to thank everyone for their thoughts, comments and input. I drove my new pickup home yesterday, which ended up being a 5.3. I was pleasantly surprised how well the 10 speed changes that engine from what I remembered of my 2012. Very smooth shifts on flat ground and it never really felt like it struggled going up some of the small mountain passes on my way back home. Always seem to be in the right gear. 

Bought a `25 with the 5.3. Mine has 3.42`s but, not much different than the 3.23`s. Runs well. The 10 speed will continue to shift better as you put miles on it. Mine was a little jerky for a while. It had 5 miles on it when I drove it home. It`s got 3600 on it now. The trans has almost became like butter now.

Posted
9 minutes ago, PunchT37 said:

Bought a `25 with the 5.3. Mine has 3.42`s but, not much different than the 3.23`s. Runs well. The 10 speed will continue to shift better as you put miles on it. Mine was a little jerky for a while. It had 5 miles on it when I drove it home. It`s got 3600 on it now. The trans has almost became like butter now.


I did notice that a couple of times and didn’t think too much of it. Mine 8 when I drove it off the lot. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Z71RAD88 said:


I did notice that a couple of times and didn’t think too much of it. Mine 8 when I drove it off the lot. 

 

3 minutes ago, Z71RAD88 said:


I did notice that a couple of times and didn’t think too much of it. Mine 8 when I drove it off the lot. 

Yeah. Mostly 2/3 and 3/4 shift. Lotta 3/4.

Posted
On 3/20/2025 at 8:57 PM, Z71RAD88 said:


thanks! It’s been weeks since I was torn on my engine selection and decided to “split the difference” if you will and going 5.3. 

You made a good choice. I've had 4 5.3L trucks and never had any problems with any of them.

Posted
On 3/24/2025 at 6:40 PM, Bikerjon said:

You made a good choice. I've had 4 5.3L trucks and never had any problems with any of them.

I'm the other end of that.  I've only ever owned 1 5.3.  It didn't survive to 100,000 miles.  2007 Tahoe with DOD.  Life got stuck.  Piston ate the valve.  Truck was 6 months out of warranty.  I was stranded in Laramie, WY with my wife and son.  Ended up trading for a Malibu just so I could get home.  I know the 5.3 and 6.2 are basically the same engine.  It was a tough choice for me to go 6.2 or 3.0.  The deciding factor was what was available in July 2020 when COVID made dealership barren. 

Posted
On 3/3/2025 at 9:29 AM, Z71RAD88 said:

I'm moving forward with a new truck purchase in the next few weeks and struggling to decide which engine to go with. I live in CA and don't tow. Typically drive 20,000 per year. My typical commute is 35 miles each way with 90% country roads at 55 mph and freeway at 65 mph, a combo of the two. I do get up the mountains frequently so the extra torque from the 6.2 and 3.0 appease me. I do understand having the turbo will be helpful at elevation compare to a NA engine. 

 

I was initially all set on the 6.2 but with the recent notice from NHTSA, It's got me thinking twice. 

 

Never owned a diesel and don't feel overly confident I can feed it the proper/required diesel living in California. 

 

What would you all go with? Trim level wise going RST or LTZ. Deals seem to be better on the LTZ with the 3.0. 

https://www.gm-trucks.com/nhtsa-investigates-chevrolet-silverado-gmc-sierra-l87-6-2l-v8-engines-for-potential-failure/

Posted
4 hours ago, customboss said:


yes, thank you. End up going LTZ with 5.3. Very happy so far after a week or so of ownership. Much different driving experience than my last 5.3 with 6 speed. Averaging 18.5-19 mpg going to and from work with one stretch of straight highway at 70 mpg for 22.1 once arriving to the office. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I started with a folding cover by BAK PAC on my 2500. It went bad after close to 5 years. Bent and vinyl coming loose. Contacted BAK and they gave me a very good discount on a Revolver. Had it a number of years. Mostly outdoor storage. Some garage storage. Vinyl started to come loose. Still under warranty so they replaced to cover. Sold the 2500, bought the 1500 and got another revolver for it. Had it a couple years now and no issues. I store it indoors. Got a bit of discount when buying it as well. If you are seeing problems, contact BAK or real truck and let them know. Customer service was pretty good. But I think they changed their warranty.
    • I agree, there is no one answer fits all as every rig is different, one may be pulling some little aluminum fishing boat while another is towing a monstrosity that weighs a lot and hopefully the owner if the rig has some prior experience to know what drive mode they should choose.    It also struck me and this is from watching a few of those boat ramp escapades videos in the past, Ford being one of the vehicles that has the auto front axle hubs and sure enough its found out that one hub has crapped out and won't engage and may not have manual hubs to even select on both sides so they are on the boat ramp stuck with no four wheel drive and spinning .... they flat out need a tow to get up the ramp and deal with the vehicles new found issues. That can happen to all brands of pickup, finding out either four wheel drive or 4 low isn't working right at the time its needed it to work as some electronic crap has failed. 
    • Its possible you never had the joy of the crappy boat launches we tend to have around here or really some of them are just grades down to the river if its a river scenario and the conditions change all the time with the river levels and silt deposits. Some of the lakes we went to years ago, there was no such thing as a cement pad that went down into the water that the trailer stayed on, it was gravel maybe up to the water line and then duck crap much beyond that so sinking the boat tires into mud. Of course some of the more established lakes had a cement bar type boat ramp but sometimes it was covered in green slime closer and certainly within the water and a two wheel drive had all sorts of fun if one had to touch that slime with the rear tires.    A neighbor of mine had made a comment years back with his chev truck that was probably about the same year as yours but a half ton extended cab 4x4 and he a a fiberglass boat with an inboard so it wasn't a feather weight and he had gone out to one of the large popular lakes in the area and don't ask me how this happened but he was in two wheel drive as he figured he didn't require four wheel drive for that boat ramp and somehow upon pulling the boat out he twisted one of his drive axles. I suspect it must have spun and then grabbed on the cement ramp and shocked it to the degree of twisting it. He would have had the standard 8.5 or whatever it was axle housing as the 9.5 ring gear like my truck has also has larger drive axles as far as I know. Anyway he was feeling a vibration driving home and had it checked out and a shop found that the tire/hub was wobbling because of the axle had twisted so in went a new drive axle. After that bad experience he said he made sure to put it into four wheel drive to lower the stress on the rear axle. Of course that is where an HD truck can handle a lot more stress and no doubt these newer half tons with their larger ring gears probably have larger drive axles as well to match vs back in the day. 
    • Desirable - as in does someone WANT one, aspire to have one. Could reasonably buy any car they want and CHOOSE these instead.    I didn't watch the video, why did they win?
    • The use of absolutes like "always" to describe gear selection, and giving free advice at a boat ramp sounds like a recipe for disaster. It's a boat ramp, not a farm, for starters.   IMO gear selection should depend on the obstacle. If low range is working and this is a slower speed, controlled ordeal, I'd keep using that.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...