Jump to content

Which engine - 5.3, 6.2 or 3.0?

Z71RAD88
 Share

Recommended Posts

Bikerjon Enthusiast

Bikerjon

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Z71RAD88 said:

I'm moving forward with a new truck purchase in the next few weeks and struggling to decide which engine to go with. I live in CA and don't tow. Typically drive 20,000 per year. My typical commute is 35 miles each way with 90% country roads at 55 mph and freeway at 65 mph, a combo of the two. I do get up the mountains frequently so the extra torque from the 6.2 and 3.0 appease me. I do understand having the turbo will be helpful at elevation compare to a NA engine. 

 

I was initially all set on the 6.2 but with the recent notice from NHTSA, It's got me thinking twice. 

 

Never owned a diesel and don't feel overly confident I can feed it the proper/required diesel living in California. 

 

What would you all go with? Trim level wise going RST or LTZ. Deals seem to be better on the LTZ with the 3.0. 

I got a Trail Boss with a 6.2 in December. Holy sh*t is this thing fast compared to my other Silverado's with the 5.3. Never had any problems with the 5.3s. As for any problems with the 6.2 engine there are hundreds of thousands of them out there running just fine and making a lot of power. If I have any problems with my engine GM is going to fix it. That's what a warranty is for. As far as gas mileage forget it. I ride a Harley and drive a big 4X4 so I don't worry about gas mileage, however living in Cali this may be more of a concern to you. If you are asking my opinion I would go with a gas powered V8. 5.3 or even better a 6.2.

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

newdude
newdude

Is it though?  I can reset my trip meter and drive 7 miles and get the same result.  That's not an accurate measurement of MPG, what it can achieve in a 7 mile stretch.        

Transient
Transient

I see that you ordered your truck before I was able to post my experience.  Imo, you made the right choice getting the 3.0 Duramax.  I have a 2020 with the 6.2 and lived in San Diego from 2020 to 2023

newdude
newdude

41mi.  Doesn't count.  Show us what you get on a tank or current lifetime MPG, that counts.  

Posted Images

Jus Cruisin Enthusiast

Jus Cruisin

Posted
Posted

I've had a 6.2l for a little over 2 years. I have the GM performance exhaust on it and love the sound. Highway mpg is 22ish. Around town, it is 16ish. Premium gas is all that I use. 

 

All though I'm happy with the 6.2l, I'm thinking I'll go 3.0l next. Diesel is cheaper than premium. I'll give up the V8 growl though. 

JeffKirk Enthusiast

JeffKirk

Posted
Posted (edited)

I posted this on another engine debate thread, but speaks to your question with the exception that I have never owned a diesel.  Don't get caught up in some of the mileage claims...one on this thread is a 7.2 mile sampling, so totally irrelevant.  My 2018 with the 5.3 averaged 18.9 over a 6000 mile time period of mixed city and highway use.  My 6.2 is currently logging 18.1 over a 3500 time period of the same use.

 

I know we beat this to death and opinions are all over the board, but here is my experience and thoughts.

  • Bought a 2018 GMC Sierra SLT new with the 5.3 and 8 speed transmission.  Owned that over 6 years and 65K miles using it as a typical homeowner would.  I do tow a 6000 pound tri-toon boat which the 5.3 handled well.
  • Traded in my 2018 for a 2024 GMC Sierra Denali with the 6.2 and 10 speed transmission.  The difference in power and all around drivability is obvious and I do think the 10 speed contributes to that.  Pulling my boat is a different experience now in terms of power.  This is where you really notice the increased torque and my pulling mileage improved by 1.5 mpg (calculated running the same 8 hour roundtrip we do every year).  I do run 93 octane gas even though this is debated up and down, I don't care for one minute about spending the extra dollars at the pump.  I'm not rich, but capable of owning this truck and putting 93 in it.  
  • Bottom line, I would never look back at the 5.3 after owning the 6.2, to me it would now be a deal breaker.  That said, no disrespect for the 5.3 and I had a great experience with mine.  No mechanical failures and only routine maintenance in 6 years of ownership.  I do hope the 6.2 gives me the same experience, but time will tell.

One happy 6.2 owner here!

 

Edited by JeffKirk
newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, PunchT37 said:

My ‘25 LT 2wd 5.3 with 3.42 gears has done this, at least at times. 
 

 

E36D1F76-2641-419B-94D2-A9312AF38EE2.jpeg

 

22 hours ago, Z71RAD88 said:

 

Wow. Impressive. Thanks for sharing. 

 

 

Is it though?  I can reset my trip meter and drive 7 miles and get the same result.  That's not an accurate measurement of MPG, what it can achieve in a 7 mile stretch.  

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
JeffKirk Enthusiast

JeffKirk

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, newdude said:

 

 

 

Is it though?  I can reset my trip meter and drive 7 miles and get the same result.  That's not an accurate measurement of MPG, what it can achieve in a 7 mile stretch.  

 

 

 

Exactly my thoughts.  I have a very long downhill stretch where I live and could post a mpg photo that would make you run and buy a 6.2...lol

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted

2.7 Turbomax, 3.0 Duramax and 5.3.  Skip the 6.2.  

 

Turbomax and the Duramax have the best factory powertrain warranty, 5yr/100k miles.  The only downfall is the Turbomax can be option limited so if you wanted buckets, gotta go with one of the other engines.  As for MPG with the Turbomax, I've got 3 years on mine (2022.5 HO before they called it Turbomax) and I've averaged the life of the truck almost 4mpg more than my old 2018 5.3 6 speed.  Currently in 32,000mi, lifetime MPG is 19.3mpg, my 5.3 when I traded it was 15.7mpg lifetime in 48,000mi.  

 

Duramax is the MPG king for sure.  There is added costs (diesel does run closer to 91/93 prices but again, better MPG, oil changes are a bit more, DEF).  You could easily get 25mpg or more per tank out of the 3.0.    

 

5.3 with the 10 speed makes the 5.3 a way better platform that it used to be with the 6 speed.  It was better with the 8, but the 10 makes it more enjoyable.  

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
8 minutes ago, newdude said:

2.7 Turbomax, 3.0 Duramax and 5.3.  Skip the 6.2.  

 

Turbomax and the Duramax have the best factory powertrain warranty, 5yr/100k miles.  The only downfall is the Turbomax can be option limited so if you wanted buckets, gotta go with one of the other engines.  As for MPG with the Turbomax, I've got 3 years on mine (2022.5 HO before they called it Turbomax) and I've averaged the life of the truck almost 4mpg more than my old 2018 5.3 6 speed.  Currently in 32,000mi, lifetime MPG is 19.3mpg, my 5.3 when I traded it was 15.7mpg lifetime in 48,000mi.  

 

Duramax is the MPG king for sure.  There is added costs (diesel does run closer to 91/93 prices but again, better MPG, oil changes are a bit more, DEF).  You could easily get 25mpg or more per tank out of the 3.0.    

 

5.3 with the 10 speed makes the 5.3 a way better platform that it used to be with the 6 speed.  It was better with the 8, but the 10 makes it more enjoyable.  

 

Ya, I'm going buckets. Over the past few days really leaning towards the 5.3. It best suites my needs a vast majority of the time. 

PunchT37 Enthusiast

PunchT37

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, newdude said:

 

 

 

Is it though?  I can reset my trip meter and drive 7 miles and get the same result.  That's not an accurate measurement of MPG, what it can achieve in a 7 mile stretch.  

 

 

 

This should be a little better. By the way, no long hills here. 

98D15B4F-41BF-4635-A84E-3F9759043BB5.jpeg

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, PunchT37 said:

This should be a little better. By the way, no long hills here. 

98D15B4F-41BF-4635-A84E-3F9759043BB5.jpeg

 

 

41mi.  Doesn't count.  Show us what you get on a tank or current lifetime MPG, that counts.  

  • Like 1
PunchT37 Enthusiast

PunchT37

Posted
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, newdude said:

 

 

41mi.  Doesn't count.  Show us what you get on a tank or current lifetime MPG, that counts.  

You are correct but, I did say "at times, at least" in the 1`st post. What does any engine get it`s whole life? Lots of factors involved. I know my 2000 LM7 with 3.73 gears won`t come close to this T1 truck with the L84.

 

I`m not trying to deceive anyone into believing a heavy truck with a v8 gets 25 mpg all day, every day.😉

Edited by PunchT37
Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 hours ago, newdude said:

2.7 Turbomax, 3.0 Duramax and 5.3.  Skip the 6.2.  

 

Turbomax and the Duramax have the best factory powertrain warranty, 5yr/100k miles.  The only downfall is the Turbomax can be option limited so if you wanted buckets, gotta go with one of the other engines.  As for MPG with the Turbomax, I've got 3 years on mine (2022.5 HO before they called it Turbomax) and I've averaged the life of the truck almost 4mpg more than my old 2018 5.3 6 speed.  Currently in 32,000mi, lifetime MPG is 19.3mpg, my 5.3 when I traded it was 15.7mpg lifetime in 48,000mi.  

 

Duramax is the MPG king for sure.  There is added costs (diesel does run closer to 91/93 prices but again, better MPG, oil changes are a bit more, DEF).  You could easily get 25mpg or more per tank out of the 3.0.    

 

5.3 with the 10 speed makes the 5.3 a way better platform that it used to be with the 6 speed.  It was better with the 8, but the 10 makes it more enjoyable.  

 

3 hours ago, newdude said:

2.7 Turbomax, 3.0 Duramax and 5.3.  Skip the 6.2.  

 

Turbomax and the Duramax have the best factory powertrain warranty, 5yr/100k miles.  The only downfall is the Turbomax can be option limited so if you wanted buckets, gotta go with one of the other engines.  As for MPG with the Turbomax, I've got 3 years on mine (2022.5 HO before they called it Turbomax) and I've averaged the life of the truck almost 4mpg more than my old 2018 5.3 6 speed.  Currently in 32,000mi, lifetime MPG is 19.3mpg, my 5.3 when I traded it was 15.7mpg lifetime in 48,000mi.  

 

Duramax is the MPG king for sure.  There is added costs (diesel does run closer to 91/93 prices but again, better MPG, oil changes are a bit more, DEF).  You could easily get 25mpg or more per tank out of the 3.0.    

 

5.3 with the 10 speed makes the 5.3 a way better platform that it used to be with the 6 speed.  It was better with the 8, but the 10 makes it more enjoyable.  


I agree with your fuel selection on the 6.2, if I were to go with it I’d run it with 91 since that’s the highest we even have in CA. I own zero equipment to tow so I don’t have that factor in my engine choice. I’ve driven both and you can for sure tell the difference but I’d only be getting the 6.2 for bragging right and less downshifting going uphill, faster acceleration, etc. 

JeffKirk Enthusiast

JeffKirk

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Z71RAD88 said:

 


I agree with your fuel selection on the 6.2, if I were to go with it I’d run it with 91 since that’s the highest we even have in CA. I own zero equipment to tow so I don’t have that factor in my engine choice. I’ve driven both and you can for sure tell the difference but I’d only be getting the 6.2 for bragging right and less downshifting going uphill, faster acceleration, etc. 

I completely understand where your are coming from, the 5.3 served me well for 6 years and was reliable.  Congrats in advance of your new to be truck, you will love it!

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 hours ago, JeffKirk said:

I completely understand where your are coming from, the 5.3 served me well for 6 years and was reliable.  Congrats in advance of your new to be truck, you will love it!


Thank you! I am really excited. Been almost 10 years since my last new vehicle. Looking forward to the upgraded features of a 2025 vehicle. 

redwngr Senior Enthusiast

redwngr

Posted
Posted (edited)

Here's one of mine. 

One tankful.

Filled near home, crossed at Sarnia-Port Huron and refilled somewhere in NC on the way to Raleigh.  

 

image.thumb.jpeg.3ce7e54350b92dafd4fce78d2e09092d.jpeg

 

 

Edited by redwngr
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Another JR
      Open Door Chimes When Key is Out

      By Another JR · Posted

      The “engine hours” display is there because the truck detects the key presence as you were thinking.   My first step would be to call a dealer service person and ask if this a known issue and how they deal with it. If you don’t get meaningful advice there, i would try a couple of DIY things before bringing it in for troubleshooting/repair.   It sounds like a mechanical key detection switch is stuck, but I have not actually seen what the internals look like. Maybe spray some Caig Deoxit (electrical contact cleaner) in the key hole and work the key in and out in case it’s an electrical contact cleanliness issue.  If that doesn’t work, next apply whatever lubricant GM recommends and work the key in and out a few times.    Good luck with it. 
    • Atlas
      AFM Experience

      By Atlas · Posted

      Carbon on valves would be the least of my worries on a light duty, 1500-series pickup with 357k provided the engine still ran halfway decently. Everything else is likely toast, on its way out, or has already been mauled to death by cheap mechanics and backyard fixes. Those kinds of trucks nickel and dime a guy to death.   I wouldn't think having the top end cleaned once or twice would be a big deal on a 5.3 but maybe it is?
    • PunchT37
      AFM Experience

      By PunchT37 · Posted

      I wonder how much carbon is on all those high mileage valves?
    • Atlas
      AFM Experience

      By Atlas · Posted

      When I had a Bumper subscription for a few days when I needed to run title histories on cars I was looking at, I decided to look up a few of my old/past vehicles.   My 2015 Silverado was still actively registered and it last sold in 2024 with 160k on the clock. No idea if that's on the original engine but someone's keeping it on the road or the original AFM stuff is still going.   It used 0w20. I remember feeding it Mobil 0w20 AFE for the first 30k of its life on <5k OCI's.     Edit: Just did a nationwide search on Autotrader for 2015-2025 Silverados with 5.3's and sorted by highest mileage first.   357k 352k 292k 291k 290k 277k 271k 268k 266k 259k 256k   High mileage on a modern 5.3 doesn't seem all that uncommon, but that's just searching mostly dealer ads on Autotrader. FB Marketplace has all kinds of high mileage 5.3's going back to 2007    
    • Chuck FB
      Bridgestone vs Goodyear tires?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I can't say I have ever heard of someone getting that type of mileage out of a set of tires even though they rotated on a regular basis but without a doubt if the front end gets wear and those tires are no longer able to track straight it scrubs them off, and driving style and road surface make a huge difference as well.    However that is not what prompted me to comment as it was the new tire theme of sitting in storage waiting to be used scenario. I am sure some tires can last for quite a while in storage if its not too warm and out of the sunlight but unfortunately some tires the way they their rubber compound is formulated they can age and dry out even in a reasonably decent storage location. My brother ran into this maybe three years ago when he was looking at the tires that were on his dually truck and a combination of wear on the rear ones and noticing that the front tires had some cracks around the sidewall of the tire not far from the bead but he had replaced only the front ones not long ago with 2 of the remaining 6 he had left from the initial two sets of takeoffs he had all bought at the same time .... 10 years ago ! ( the years fly by, a truck that only gets used a bit to haul a camper during the summer and sits in a shed for a large part of the year ). That second set of 6 tires, two he had put on the front prior like I said and they had very little wear but those cracks were now present. So we go into the shed where the other 4 tires had been stored all this time and every one of them had the same cracks in the sidewalls and so in the end it amounted to throwing away 6 brand new but 10 year old takeoff tires into the dump that he got a deal on at a tire shop because they aged out. They were a Ford factory equipment BFG tire and those tires did not age well compared to some tires I've seen far older then that and did not show that type of aging. True, they always say up here anyway that 7 years is sort of a limit for age by rights, we don't have the intense prolonged heat that many of you have down in the states that just cook tires and depends on where the vehicle sits when not in use. GB, another words maybe had you bought a set of tires to store it would have been fine as long as you used them up fast enough but there are no guarantees when it comes to rubber, tires or of that other type stored in some guys wallets 😆

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...