Jump to content

5.3 vs 3.0 longevity

ryanm33
 Share

Recommended Posts

ryanm33 Enthusiast

ryanm33

Posted
Posted (edited)

I am looking at upgrading my 2015 Silverado 5.3l with 190,000 km’s(118,000 miles) without any issues 🤞. I have come across 2 trucks that I am interested in. A 2025 elevation with the 3.0 Duramax, with 20,000 km(12,500 miles) and a 2024 elevation with 10,000 km(6000 miles). I see lots of posts praising the better fuel efficiency of the 3.0, but what about longevity? I keep my vehicles for 10-12 years and average 200,000kms. I know the 5.3 is tried and true, but has some lifter issues. Will the Duramax last me 10-12 years? I am fairly meticulous with routine maintenance ( oil changes, transmission fluid changes). Any input on the longevity of these engines would be appreciated.  
 

I drive about  20,000 km per year. About 50/50 city/ highway, my daily commute to work is 25 km( 15 miles) each way. 

Edited by ryanm33
  • ryanm33 changed the title to 5.3 vs 3.0 longevity
redwngr Senior Enthusiast

redwngr

Posted
Posted (edited)

We don't know.

There haven't been building 3.0's for that many years yet.

(and the 5.3 ishad changes less than 10 years ago too) 

 

The earlier LM2's had the oil bump belt changed scheduled for 150,000 miles (240,000 km)

The from 2023 to current, the 3.0 is an LZO with belt replacement scheduled for 200,000 miles (When you 3.0 gets to 200,000 miles, (320,000 km)

 

I'd say (124,000 miles) 200,000 km is a pretty safe bet.  

 

 

There are some that have already had a belt change.

 

 

Edited by redwngr
Atlas Senior Enthusiast

Atlas

Posted
Posted

Fewer parts? The 3.0 has 2 fewer cylinders, one less head, 8 fewer spark plugs, only one exhaust manifold instead of two, and doesn't have DFM garbage 😉

 

The LZ0 Duramax has a fully forged crank, steel pistons. It's built very well, but it's also subjected to higher pressures than a 5.3. All the makings of a long lasting small diesel are there...but time will tell.

PunchT37 Enthusiast

PunchT37

Posted
Posted

I stand by my statement. For all machines.

 

Back to the 3.0 vs 5.3. Pull the engines and put em on a stand and see the parts difference. Pull the rear cover and valve cover off the 3.0. Not to mention the coolant controls and added turbo parts.

Z45 Senior Enthusiast

Z45

Posted
Posted (edited)

Longevity is a function of individual ownership of the vehicle.  Some can get many years of useful life while others can make it junk in a few years.  

Edited by Z45
PunchT37 Enthusiast

PunchT37

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, Z45 said:

Longevity is a function of individual ownership of the vehicle.  Some can get many years of useful life while others can make it junk in a few years.  

True dat. But, complexity with lack of maintenance means doom comes quicker.

PunchT37 Enthusiast

PunchT37

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, Atlas said:

Fewer parts? The 3.0 has 2 fewer cylinders, one less head, 8 fewer spark plugs, only one exhaust manifold instead of two, and doesn't have DFM garbage 😉

 

The LZ0 Duramax has a fully forged crank, steel pistons. It's built very well, but it's also subjected to higher pressures than a 5.3. All the makings of a long lasting small diesel are there...but time will tell.

I wouldn’t use a forged crank as a qualifier. How bout the 5.3 vs the 6.2?

 

Yeah, I know forged is tougher than cast, but…

Atlas Senior Enthusiast

Atlas

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, ryanm33 said:

What about reliability of the emissions system?

 

Loaded question. You'll soon get all kinds of responses about how emissions have ruined modern diesels and it's all a problematic, unreliable nightmare AND its a government conspiracy designed to cost the consumer money. All while George Soros rides around in a jet and a farmer with a diesel tractor is put out of business because of DEF issues.

 

Most of the evidence is anecdotal and spiteful. My anecdotal evidence, having owned a few different modern diesels, is I've never had an issue. Whether by luck or just good maintenance, I've not had problems with SCR systems, EGR's or anything else. But I also don't modify my diesels or do things which cause issues like letting DEF go bad over seasons of no engine use, or using various fuel additives when the manufacturers say specifically don't do that. The reality few people talk about is the trucking industry and the billions of miles driven with SCR systems operational. For the most part people don't have problems, but it's certain you will hear about it when someone does. That provides a skew in both anecdotal evidence, and on forums, etc.

  • Like 2
Atlas Senior Enthusiast

Atlas

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, PunchT37 said:

I wouldn’t use a forged crank as a qualifier. How bout the 5.3 vs the 6.2?

 

Yeah, I know forged is tougher than cast, but…

 

Manufacturing defect

  • 1 month later...
Jus Cruisin Enthusiast

Jus Cruisin

Posted
Posted

So my 3.0l lasted exactly 5,403 miles. Engine siezed. Waiting for a replacement. No warning. Just a "ding" from the dash with "please restart engine" or something like that. 

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted
On 8/22/2025 at 1:11 PM, Atlas said:

 

Loaded question. You'll soon get all kinds of responses about how emissions have ruined modern diesels and it's all a problematic, unreliable nightmare AND its a government conspiracy designed to cost the consumer money. All while George Soros rides around in a jet and a farmer with a diesel tractor is put out of business because of DEF issues.

 

Most of the evidence is anecdotal and spiteful. My anecdotal evidence, having owned a few different modern diesels, is I've never had an issue. Whether by luck or just good maintenance, I've not had problems with SCR systems, EGR's or anything else. But I also don't modify my diesels or do things which cause issues like letting DEF go bad over seasons of no engine use, or using various fuel additives when the manufacturers say specifically don't do that. The reality few people talk about is the trucking industry and the billions of miles driven with SCR systems operational. For the most part people don't have problems, but it's certain you will hear about it when someone does. That provides a skew in both anecdotal evidence, and on forums, etc.

I don’t know how I missed this. In 1999 we sold our ROW clearing business. One of my brothers went along to run it for the new owner. The new owner really nails down cost. He loves spreadsheets. We only used diesel trucks. Fast forward to now. My brother and his son run 19 crews. The only diesel’s they run now are for pulling. Some crews use the smaller skid steer clearing machines. Emissions ruin the diesel trucks. Most needed to be deleted or serviced at around 100K miles. Diesel trucks went from being the most efficient most reliable trucks for work. To being more trouble than a gas work truck. I saw the 25 year transformation taking place. Most of his crews idle down pipelines during the day sometimes rarely being shut off. Then about a 20 minute ride to a motel for a ten day shift. Then a up to a 8 hour drive home. The emissions on diesel’s don’t like that. It’s a simple spreadsheet work project for the owner. It’s nothing other than cost analysis. Gas has taken over the least cost to run for longevity. There’s at least 5 backup trucks to rotate in service. They don’t start considering replacing until several hundred thousand miles. My other brother from the business I retired from runs gas service trucks. When I left 12 years ago it was diesel. No conspiracy, no agenda. 

Atlas Senior Enthusiast

Atlas

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, KARNUT said:

I don’t know how I missed this. In 1999 we sold our ROW clearing business. One of my brothers went along to run it for the new owner. The new owner really nails down cost. He loves spreadsheets. We only used diesel trucks. Fast forward to now. My brother and his son run 19 crews. The only diesel’s they run now are for pulling. Some crews use the smaller skid steer clearing machines. Emissions ruin the diesel trucks. Most needed to be deleted or serviced at around 100K miles. Diesel trucks went from being the most efficient most reliable trucks for work. To being more trouble than a gas work truck. I saw the 25 year transformation taking place. Most of his crews idle down pipelines during the day sometimes rarely being shut off. Then about a 20 minute ride to a motel for a ten day shift. Then a up to a 8 hour drive home. The emissions on diesel’s don’t like that. It’s a simple spreadsheet work project for the owner. It’s nothing other than cost analysis. Gas has taken over the least cost to run for longevity. There’s at least 5 backup trucks to rotate in service. They don’t start considering replacing until several hundred thousand miles. My other brother from the business I retired from runs gas service trucks. When I left 12 years ago it was diesel. No conspiracy, no agenda. 

 

Yeah, how did you miss that? It's interesting, all the fleets that still run diesel where they need it. Maybe those fleet managers are just stupid and haven't ascended to the level of intelligence that your brother has. Clearly people still find a lot of value in diesel trucks.

 

But to that point, gas engines have really improved in power/efficiency with direct injection and turbos, now producing diesel-like torque down low and with cheaper fuel. The choice has become blurry in the light duty market. However, when you need 800, 1200 lb-ft of pulling power in a pickup, diesel is still the winning choice- even if there are a few more things to look after. The best solution isn't always the cheapest.

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, Atlas said:

 

Yeah, how did you miss that? It's interesting, all the fleets that still run diesel where they need it. Maybe those fleet managers are just stupid and haven't ascended to the level of intelligence that your brother has. Clearly people still find a lot of value in diesel trucks.

 

But to that point, gas engines have really improved in power/efficiency with direct injection and turbos, now producing diesel-like torque down low and with cheaper fuel. The choice has become blurry in the light duty market. However, when you need 800, 1200 lb-ft of pulling power in a pickup, diesel is still the winning choice- even if there are a few more things to look after. The best solution isn't always the cheapest.

Maybe you can see through your obvious hatred that I actually mentioned what they’re still good for. After actually witnessing the change over the years. I didn’t mention the hundreds of customers who pass through our business who actually have experience the same change over. If you can manage to read the words I actually wrote they still use them where needed. There’re not as cost effective as in the past. My words are from experience. Not I heard it somewhere from someone. Maybe you can learn something if you don’t have preconceived notions to have put KARNUT in his place. If the attempt to throw shade in your first paragraph was removed you’ll see we pretty much said the same thing. I didn’t mention the horsepower or TQ ratings because that’s a gimme since the beginning of the horsepower wars. What’s new is the loss of usefulness in the business world. I come from the business world and pass the experience from my eyes. No graphs, not a one off. Maybe if you put away your obvious distain you may get enlighten. You seem to only pick up words that may make your point. Even if the true meaning is right there in front of you. So I’ll wait for your next attempt to insult. But once again I’ll remind you that we pretty much said the same thing. 

Edited by KARNUT

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      True. My statement needs qualification. "For a shade tree mechanic, re-assembling the front engine to achieve a rough baseline timing of 0 degrees, as is approximated and indicated by common visual indicator mark alignment, measured with a human eye capable of 20/20 vision *with correction, I am reasonably confident that I have followed the outlined procedures/ prescribed methods for verifying baseline timing."   😉   In the end, the computer sets the timing, it's continuously variable based on sensor input, and the distributor only has a degree or two of physical adjustability intended for dialing in the final setting for cam ****** once everything is back together. But even that final value is acceptable within, I believe, +/- 3 degrees.   I thought my exhaust project was going to be a bear. To my surprise, the old clamps came right off last night, and I was able to unbolt all the hangers instead of having to muscle the rubber mounts. The old cat is ready to slip off the factory y-pipe. The rest is ready to come out with one or two cuts, and I've got a fresh blade waiting. I love living where rust isn't a thing.    
    • Bloody Marty
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Bloody Marty · Posted

      I work at a Chevrolet dealership & hear it all believe me.  Just reads like there's going to be a fist fight over filters.  Can't get enough, continue!!
    • Chuck FB
      Tire psi

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I just can't think of the exact term GM uses for that higher gvw package without looking at the website but basically sort of a trailering package and I imagine it may also have been created to skirt around the licensing fee differences between a3/4 and 1 ton that apply in some states although ironically I believe in some states its the reverse that a 1 ton is the cheaper truck to license over a 3/4 ton. It makes no difference here in Alberta but oddly enough a 1 ton through my insurance company is a bit cheaper to insure over a 3/4 ton as its based on the insurance statistics they generate.    For sure when ever you do have the chance to weigh your truck and to be fair, try to have the fuel tank full or nearly so rather than give yourself a false sense of the truck being lighter by having an almost empty tank.    In my other comment I was mentioning stock sized tires and partly in case someone was reading this and thinking they could lower their pressure down to what your aftermarket tires are able to do with your empty truck as that is a vastly different picture in the leeway you have to play with for running minimum pressures while remaining safe. I will say also that its easy to see from reactions of truck owners that may have been more used to owning a half ton in the past or a car and be it on a forum like this or in person etc that they get so wrapped up in that placard pressure sticker that they can't get their head wrapped around the fact that an HD truck due to how much it can carry can also vary the tire pressures drastically lower than those pressures ( typically more so for the rear axle on stock sized tires ) when empty vs some car that isn't made to carry much so the tire pressures can't be lowered since it needs almost that much pressure just to carry the empty car.    If I ever do find myself in the states with this truck, I will only be too happy to switch it over to the US measuring system as then I will understand all the dash readings. The only thing that is off for me slightly with US measurements is US miles per gallon as I grew up with the Imperial gallon and to this day up here anyway speak in Imperial miles per gallon ( I don't do that on this forum though as that would confuse everyone for no good reason ). 
    • jgaudet99
      Tire psi

      By jgaudet99 · Posted

      Yes that's right, it's the upgrade that includes the overload spring and all that stuff.   Someday when I'm empty and going by a scale I'm going to stop in and get some weight readings.   Exactly  you should have the ability to change individual settings, in in Canada so I'm driving with kph but then I'm stuck with kpa when I want psi lol    
    • Chuck FB
      Tire psi

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      You must have that upgraded gvw package which is only available or at least was in 2025 with the diesel engine for the 3/4 ton and that gave the truck physically the larger 12.0 ring gear rear diff and the 3500 rear spring pack. There is a difference in what the diff housing looks like externally as one tell tale and also your truck should have the upper overload spring pack and the frame pads that the pack goes up against.    The pressure the tpms system kicks the alarm in on a stock setting truck, that is a good question and was just from what I recall but I doubt I made any notes on it as I knew for the rear that it was not at all what I was after regardless either. Being that you have a diesel and if running on stock tires the minimum pressure on an empty truck seems to be around 50 psi from hearing of those that have weighted the front axle but the rear axle is very similar in weight to a gas truck and again a near empty truck on the rear could go down to 35 pounds at minimum. However the weigh scale is the proper way to know for sure as a guide.    As to changing the readings on the dash from metric to the US measuring system, oh yes that is done easily but what I was attempting to explain was that I can't pick and choose items I want to have in US and those I still want in the metric system at the same time as its either all or none. For example lets say you drove into Canada and switched your dash over to metric so your speedometer read in km an hour, well then your reading kilopascals on your tpms readout and your wife looks over and says what the hell is that saying in the tpms screen and you say "darned if I know, I think its Chinese" !

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...