Jump to content

Gear Swap

M1ck3y

By M1ck3y
in Engines & Drivetrain

 Share

Recommended Posts

M1ck3y Senior Enthusiast

M1ck3y

Posted
Posted

Can someone explain how gear ratio affects driveshaft rotation?

 

Google says a lower (higher numerically) ratio reduces driveshaft speed. Other websites state that it’s the opposite and that the drive shaft spins more for every rotation of the engine. 
 

I’m trying to determine how a gear swap would affect the drive shafts critical speed, and or the trucks top speed..

davester Senior Enthusiast

davester

Posted
Posted

To go a given speed (say 30 mph) on your tires, a rear diff w 3.73 ratio, the driveshaft would rotate slower, compared to the same truck w a 4.10 rear diff.

 

However, your top speed may not change a lot, because these trucks are flying bricks.  While your driveshaft may spin slower, the engine may not have enough power to go wot, or the transmission may downshift.

  • Like 1
MikeBMW Senior Enthusiast

MikeBMW

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, M1ck3y said:

Is a gear swap worth it? Better acceleration?

I suppose it could be if you're looking for quick acceleration and worse gas mileage.
Not sure what you have now, but mine is a 3.42.
I just went the route of tuning for a 91+ octane for being quicker and worse gas mileage (with the benefit of more expensive gas). 🤪

M1ck3y Senior Enthusiast

M1ck3y

Posted
  • Author
Posted
42 minutes ago, MikeBMW said:

I suppose it could be if you're looking for quick acceleration and worse gas mileage.
Not sure what you have now, but mine is a 3.42.
I just went the route of tuning for a 91+ octane for being quicker and worse gas mileage (with the benefit of more expensive gas). 🤪


I have 3.23s with 33” tires so it’s really around 3.10 now.

 

Im just not sure if a move to 3.73s would be enough to be noticeable..

  • Like 2
MikeBMW Senior Enthusiast

MikeBMW

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, M1ck3y said:


I have 3.23s with 33” tires so it’s really around 3.10 now.

 

I'm just not sure if a move to 3.73s would be enough to be noticeable..

It would be definitely noticeable.
When I was much younger, the entire aspect of our camaros and corvettes was getting 4:11s!
Horrible for highway driving but drag racing was great!
My old Chevy truck with 40s, on 4:11s, though, worked well. 😀
truck.thumb.png.6bad5801a50c229512a82ad917cdc4b9.png

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
On 9/22/2025 at 7:53 PM, M1ck3y said:


I have 3.23s with 33” tires so it’s really around 3.10 now.

 

Im just not sure if a move to 3.73s would be enough to be noticeable..

 

You will certainly notice the change.  I could even tell the difference between 3.42s and 3.73s.  

 

You might consider 4.10s with the 33s.

 

Do you have the 8-speed transmission?

  • Like 1
M1ck3y Senior Enthusiast

M1ck3y

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, swathdiver said:

 

You will certainly notice the change.  I could even tell the difference between 3.42s and 3.73s.  

 

You might consider 4.10s with the 33s.

 

Do you have the 8-speed transmission?


Yeah, 8l90e

 

So you had to change the carrier for 3.73s?

Edited by M1ck3y
  • Like 1
swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, M1ck3y said:

So you had to change the carrier for 3.73s?

 

I'm using a different axle in a different truck and incidentally, no, didn't have to change carriers as it started with a 3.42.

 

In both cases, the carriers are smaller for 3.23 and lower numerical numbers but a spacer is made to accommodate the higher numerical numbers but it is not as strong and many shops won't use them.  A carrier change is required to do it right.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined

  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,736 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      summer road trips in the 2026 2500HD

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Aimatdeer
      Ac not keeping up

      By Aimatdeer · Posted

      Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • CamGTP
      Gas Prices

      By CamGTP · Posted

      Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...