Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I replaced the Transfer case switch. I hear no noise when trying to turm dial to 2wd. Only light that will come on the dial is 4wd high. I have disconected baterrie put into newtral then tried the past 4 low to take it to newtral but it just stays in 4wd high.  would my next best bet be to buy a new transfer case motor?   

Posted

Just guessing but your TC Actuator is not working. Could be a bad ground, bad connection or bad actuator. Just my opinion 

Several videos on this on YouTube 

  • Like 1
  • Tracy Zoller changed the title to Can not get my 2015 GMC out of 4wd high
Posted
44 minutes ago, rav3 said:

Just guessing but your TC Actuator is not working. Could be a bad ground, bad connection or bad actuator. Just my opinion 

Several videos on this on YouTube 

 

Posted

There was a TSB for this a long time ago, but unfortunately I don't have the number anymore.

Ask your local GM dealer to look through the system for it (doesn't have to be a GMC dealer - just any GM dealer service department).

  • Like 2
Posted

This is what ChatGPT replied with when I asked for the tsb:

 

GM TSB / Service Update Bulletin Number: 14616
Also referenced as: Service Update for “Service 4WD” Message – Transfer Case Stuck in 4WD HI
This bulletin addresses vehicles equipped with RPO NQH transfer case and provides a procedure to reprogram the transfer case control module to help resolve the stuck-in-4WD issue.

  • Like 3
Posted

SB-10090217-2280.pdf https://share.google/Uw9HY5OSBGDCcl2nX

  • Like 3
Posted

I am having the same issue. I did Lean how to manually take it out of 4wd. I replaced the transfer case motor, did the reset sequence and it has not helped my issues. but now rather than being stuck in 4wd and im 2 wheel and cannot get into 4wd.

 

When i took off the old transfer case motor, I heard a loud clunk when i pulled it off. Now the same 4wd light is lit but its actually only in 2wd

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Are we talking about the same thing, though? The 7 versus 3 wear metals was from Lakespeed's 3.0-specific oil brand comparison test between AcDelco oil and Mobil ESP. The filter remains a constant so whatever excess particles the AcDelco oil is producing aren't being filtered out.   I'm assuming there's a parallel comparison to be made; IF the filter can filter down those particles, engine life increases, and your graph makes the case that a better filter (lower micron rating) can increase engine life. Introducing fewer particles AND filtering those particles with higher efficiency is the best of all worlds. Good oil, good filter.   Where we may disagree is the "baseline relative engine life". I'm more apt to believe the base engine life value is 200k+ on very average oil and filters, "bulk oil of unknown brand and white-label generic fleet-grade filter, Jiffy Lube"   Going from a 10 micron filter to a 5 micron filter should boost a base 200k to 275k in a vacuum as a single factor alone.   Here's the whatabout: How does regularly changing the oil and filter ahead of recommended schedule influence baseline engine life? Most people aren't going to science the heck out of this stuff or ask about Micron ratings, HTHS, or wear comparison tests at Jiffy Lube. Most of the Jiffy lube techs would say they need to call their tech support line to even try to get an answer.   --   Because we love anecdotes here, when I was fishing for 4.3 parts at a local yard this weekend, ALL of the 4.3 vehicles had well over 200k. I love looking at odometers of junked vehicles. How far did THIS go before landing at the crusher? The ones that still had engines weren't seized. None of them were vehicles I'd consider were Amsoil queens, in fact most of them had some kind of service cling-sticker in the corner of the windshield indicating it probably had very average maintenance services. Even the fresh parts rigs- I'm not sure taking an S/T series to 400k has much value considering the running value of those vehicles was probably somewhere around $1,000. 25+ years is a good run on time alone.   The intake manifold I salvaged had clean and bright pool areas. As expected, I found the fuel lines in the manifold rubbed through, just like mine. I'm guessing the lines on that donor truck started leaking, the truck started running rough, and its owner said that's enough I'm unwilling or can't take it out of service for several days, or spend $1000+ to repair it at a shop, it's simply time for a newer more reliable vehicle (or, more than likely, this is the 2nd, 3rd time this has happened in the truck's lifetime). While I don't count on my Blazer for reliability, the thought of giving it away for parts at certain points during my adventure, and being mentally free from its needs has has crossed my mind. I'd be losing $1500 or so, but I can only make more money; not time.
    • still $4.00 85 oct.
    • Always here to help. Discount Code: TIFF5OFF
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...