Jump to content

Old truck buffs, please read


Cool Zr2

Recommended Posts

Posted

This past weekend at my Brothers resort, I went on a hike and made quite a discovery. I found an old Mercury, I had seen it before, but never paid attention to it. Its a really old 1? ton Mercury (ford in canada back in the day).

 

Does anyone know anything about old trucks here? Whats its value? I have pictures but I can't find my camera, its packed away from the trip still somewhere.

 

Visual things I can tell you about it:

 

It says M-3 on the chrome on the hood, its that sky blue/green color and it has a flat head v-8 in it.

 

Is it worth anything??? I have heard those flat head motors are worth some coin.

Posted

After reading several online sources for more info, it just might be a 1951 Mercury M-3 1-ton truck. Think of the Ford F3, or the F-350 nowadays.

 

The engine is a little bit tricky to identify (for me) without a good visual. My best guess on this is that it's the 239 ci (3.9L) Ford Flathead V8 with the passenger camshaft and a 4-speed. 106hp @3600 rpm and 225 lb-ft @ 1900 rpm. Bore & stroke ratios are 3.1875 x 3.750, compression ratio is 6.80:1, head bolt count is 24, and a Ford-Holley 2 bbl as the carbuerator.

 

Gross vehicle weight is @ 6800lbs with a 122" wheelbase.

 

If you have a pic of the serial plate, that would help me immensly because all the info I've stated is basically guesswork. Also, here is a link for more info on these trucks.

 

If I had money, I'd tell you what I'd do. I'd go downtown and buy a Mercury truck or two... :sigh::lol:

 

And if I'm right about any of this, you would be best off to find out if anyone can claim it (don't tell them that you're interested in it if you are), and if no one claims it...

 

TAKE IT !!!!!!

 

You'll have one of the rarest vehicles on the road aside from the old Studebaker and International pickups of the early 60s, not to mention one HELL of a project vehicle. :thumbs:

 

Hope this helps. :mad:

Posted

It appears to be a 1951 from the hood design.

 

Its a 255 V-8, 112 hp.... lol

 

My pics can't go up yet becasue my Frontpage is wacked out.

Posted

Ahh, ok. Then the bore & stroke would be 3.1875 x 4.000.

 

The Mercury engines of '51 had the 4" stroke crankshaft, and it used the Ford-Holley split float dual downdraft carburetor instead of the the Ford-Holley two barrel carburetor.

 

112hp/225tq.... low by today's standards, but still respectable for vehicles in that timeframe....especially the trucks.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I only have a few of the ACDelco blue remaining. One or two of the (old, old) ACDelco Professional boxes, and a couple of the newer style GM boxes with the simulcast in Chinese along with English. FWIW they've all been pretty good, regardless of where they are made, and in 20 years I've never had a problem with an e-core filter.   Now I have a couple of the "A" series in my home inventory. They come in a plain white box with the GM hologram sticker and model information. Have not installed one yet, want to use up my oldest inventory first.
    • Compression test? Weird noises? Fuel trims?
    • I suspect at some point in the near future, the hardware will be free and you pay a subscription to access the vehicle - alldata style.
    • I've been eyeing an upgrade to my tonneau cover for a bit now.  Intrigued by the BAK MX4 EZ-Lift with the torsion spring and went for the upgrade.  Thoughts and musings during unpacking, install and a few days of usage.   Once my order went into Realtruck, it took about 4 days to ship.  Unfortunately, FedEx Ground destroyed the box and contents and it was unusable upon receipt.  To Realtruck's credit, one email with pictures and an RMA was sent to me to send the first one back, and another unit was shipped out.  It arrived 3 days later, unscathed.   I opened the box and it looked like every other BAK MX4.   Biggest differences are the rails and retaining clamps, and of course the spring attached to the cover itself.     NOTE - if you are upgrading from a MX4 to the EZ-Lift, you will have to replace the rails.  The EZ-Lift rails have a notch cut in them to allow the new style retaining clamps to fit properly.  The new retaining clamps also have 2 knobs/carriage bolts and there are two tracks underneath the front panel. The strap clips are mildly different (more like the Undercover Flex clamps) in that the screws go in from the underside.  Personally I prefer these over the BAK clamps that use the nutserts that are a nuisance to install.  The remainder of the parts in the box (drain tubes, rail clamps, and bumper pads) are standard issue BAK.     I did not replace my front bed seal at the time because it seemed to be in decent shape.   BAK recommends shims on the GM trucks unless you place the clamps on the flanges about 1/3 of the way in from both the front and rear of the bed.  I shimmed the front and the middle, and initially placed the clamps equidistant.  This also turned out to be a mistake, because when I set the cover in place, the new style retaining clamps wouldn't clear the front clamp.   New style clamp inserted in the track:     And the issue which occurred because the front rail clamp was too far forward:     Once I removed the shim from the front of the bed, and slid the clamp back to the front flange, everything cleared fine.     The cover set on the rails without issue and I installed the strap clamps.  After I completed my adjustments, I pulled the pin to activate the torsion spring.  Mistake #3 on my part.  PULL THE PIN AS THE VERY VERY VERY LAST STEP!  The reason is, once you pull the pin, the torsion spring is activated.  If you have to loosen the front clamps and adjust the cover, the front panel will - by virtue of the spring, refuse to lay down.  The only way to get it to lay down so you can reinstall and tighten the clamps is to fully open the panel against the back of the cab, which will then allow the front panel of the cover to lay down and be tightened.  Not a big deal unless you haven't installed the foam pads yet (typically the last step) because minus the foam pads, you will need to place something between the frame of the cover and the back window so it doesn't get scratched.  The next time I install one I will install the foam pads before I pull the pin and activate the spring.   After using it for a few days:   The spring assist is great.  You literally can open it with one hand.  My shoulders aren't getting any younger and this was part of my motivation to swap out. The second panel latches and unlatches itself as you open and close the cover.  Neat in concept, however it took me a minute to get used to closing the cover and not hearing the "latching" sound that would tell me it was locked in place. The paddle handles are a huge upgrade and I wouldn't be surprised to see them become the standard across the Realtruck line.  They effectively eliminate the concern that a thief could coat hanger the cover open and get to the contents in the bed. I'm not sure why the very front panel on my cover has a different finish from the other 3 panels.  I have a request into Realtruck to find out if mine was not manufactured properly or if it was by design.   All in all I'm pleased.  Same level of protection, looks good, keeps stuff mostly dry (they all leak around the tailgate) and easy to install.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...