Jump to content

my new bilstein shocks


Recommended Posts

Posted

i had heard alot of guys on here talk about the bilstein hd shocks. well, i went to my 4x4 shop and had them put the bilstein heavy dutys on my truck, and they are incredible. my truck feels so much tighter and rides incredibley smooth. i am so impressed with these. they are not cheap, i paid $450.00 out the door installed. they come with a lifetime warranty for any defect. :chevy::D:D

Posted
i paid $450.00 out the door installed. 

 

 

 

 

:chevy: I'm glad you like them, but that seems pretty steep for a set of bilsteins. You can buy them at either O'Reilly or Autozone (I forget which one) for about $260 if I'm not mistaken. That's not installed price, but c'mon, installation can't cost that much. Is your truck lifted at all?

Posted

I hear ya killerZ-71! I put my Bilstein's on a couple of weeks ago and they're awesome! Ride is smooth and solid. I was originally going to get the Edelbrocks, but after all of the feedback that I picked up here, I decided to go with the Bilsteins and I couldn't be happier.

Posted

$450 :chevy::D:D

 

Mine were $49.99 each plus shipping. Easy DIY installation too

Posted

you guys are probably right, i probably paid a a little to much. but i really like the 4x4 shop i go to. the guys treat me great and do super install on anything i want. i am not super mechanically inclined, and sometimes i can screw stuff up. so i am willing to pay a little more and have everything done really well. i really like these shocks :chevy:

Posted

Model numbers for the shocks, guys? Others reading would probably love to know.

Posted

Glad those who just switched are happy with them. They've definitely served me well. Those and the Revo's when the Firestone guy pointed me toward them when they first came out and hadn't gotten the reviews yet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,737
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Christopher Miller
    Newest Member
    Christopher Miller
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,354 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Without knowing how bad your banging is, one suggestion is the intermediate steering shaft on the steering wheel. These used to be a problem on 800 and earlier series. The feeling/sound was sometimes described as "clunking" and was felt in the wheel. Also there is a plastic piece in the lower column that is referred to as a bearing. Not your traditional looking bearing though. Your ball joints, bushings and tie rods or steering rack (if equipped) are the main point of issues. You never mention total unit miles, only that you've put 60k on it.   You can search the site for help on the ISS description. Plenty of these have been replaced   https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=site%3Agm-trucks.com+intermediate+steering+shaft&ia=web
    • Yes I have is set with the 1mm disk (Minumim Tension), for spring spacing and I raised my truck in the rear 1.5". You can go 2mm  and I think 3mm if you need.Minimum. We are on our way to TN from GA.. My wife is driving and stated she cannot believe  and   stated she can not belive the difference.
    • Most 1 ton trucks come with the factory overload spring, which need to be removed for installation of RoadActive Suspension. Removing the overload allows proper fitment and ensures the system works as intended. The RAS® Mega-Duty kit will reduce squat and provide significant improvement vs the factory overload spring.
    • I wonder as well, why they would send me a text message with links to these suggested procedures totalling over $10,000 without even the slightest hint of how they arrived at these being necessary.
    • https://precisionlubrication.com/articles/oil-filter-efficiency/     For them it is a problem of $$$$ and compliance. To cover both they have to lie from the heart.    Government wants low waste oil numbers so the bar needs to be very low on contamination to met that requirement.  Consumer wants cheap maintenance (perceived cost). Again requiring a low bar.  OEM wants high margins at a cost effective warranty rate and lots of repeat customers. More low bar.  Filter manufacture wants the same thing the OEM wants. See the pattern?   Consumers are fickle and also want perfection requiring a HIGH bar. Inconsistent with all of the above. Consumers can be, when the put their minds to it, inquisitive, love winning arguments which requires some useful information to be available to support them. And this is where it gets sticky and the lies begin.    Information needs a solid well grounded point of reference if we are to compare in a useful way. There is a standard for this.  ISO 4548-12. This standard sets the particle size at a specific Beta ratio and darn few are faithful to its intent.    If they don't state the test method they change the particle size or the Beta ratio to hit a perceived favorable standard. They obscure the information in a way as to prevent direct comparisons leaving the consumer with one method. UOA's with an ISO 4406 test result. Pricey and not allot of labs willing to do the work. Lobby work happens everywhere, not just at the seat of government.       
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...