Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Here's one that IMO has been overlooked.

 

My friend became a union rep and this was part of his ficticious email address that he would give to his members who would whine alot. The term is...DILLIGAF

 

Which means...Does It Look Like I Give A F**k?!!!!!!!!!! :lol:

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I noticed NBS, and NNBS were nulled and replaced by the corresponding Model #'s. Can one of the other terms be removed as well; OBS and OOBS wasn't there a GMT400 that can replace one of those?

 

-Thanks Ryan!

Posted

It may be self explanitory, but I noticed that the term "noob" has been used in about 7 or 8 posts in this very thread, but is not on the list... ironic?

Posted

C/K truck: '73 to '87

R/V truck: '88 to '92(?) full size Blazers/Jimmys, crew cabs & Subs

 

I know RP is Royal Purple oil, but what is GC oil?

Posted
C/K truck: '73 to '87

R/V truck: '88 to '92(?) full size Blazers/Jimmys, crew cabs & Subs

Actually, '73-'87's were the R/V series, the '88-'98 pickups were the C/K body style. The Blazer/Jimmy, Subs, and crew cabs were the R/V series as long as they looked like the '73-'87 pickups.

 

Travis

Posted (edited)
C/K truck: '73 to '87

R/V truck: '88 to '92(?) full size Blazers/Jimmys, crew cabs & Subs

Actually, '73-'87's were the R/V series, the '88-'98 pickups were the C/K body style. The Blazer/Jimmy, Subs, and crew cabs were the R/V series as long as they looked like the '73-'87 pickups.

 

Travis

 

 

Your source being....?

 

I was in the Oshawa Truck Plant from '85 to '88. During the changeover to the GMT400. We had never heard of the R/V designation until the carryover trucks were renamed.

 

GMC has used the C/K designation to denote 4 x 2 & 4 x 4 trucks since the 40s. See:

 

Click

 

Click

 

Also from Wikipedia:

 

The L05 was introduced in 1987 for use in Chevrolet/GMC trucks in both the GMT400 (introduced in April 1987 as 1988 models) and the R/V series trucks such as the K5 Blazer, Suburban, and rounded-era pickups formerly classed as the C/K until 1996 which includes chassis cabs and 4-door crew cabs. Although usage was for trucks, vans, and 9C1-optioned Caprices, the L05 was also used with the following vehicles:
Edited by revrnd
Posted
C/K truck: '73 to '87

R/V truck: '88 to '92(?) full size Blazers/Jimmys, crew cabs & Subs

Actually, '73-'87's were the R/V series, the '88-'98 pickups were the C/K body style. The Blazer/Jimmy, Subs, and crew cabs were the R/V series as long as they looked like the '73-'87 pickups.

 

Travis

 

Your source being....?

 

I was in the Oshawa Truck Plant from '85 to '88. During the changeover to the GMT400. We had never heard of the R/V designation until the carryover trucks were renamed.

 

GMC has used the C/K designation to denote 4 x 2 & 4 x 4 trucks since the 40s. See:

 

Click

 

Click

 

Also from Wikipedia:

 

The L05 was introduced in 1987 for use in Chevrolet/GMC trucks in both the GMT400 (introduced in April 1987 as 1988 models) and the R/V series trucks such as the K5 Blazer, Suburban, and rounded-era pickups formerly classed as the C/K until 1996 which includes chassis cabs and 4-door crew cabs. Although usage was for trucks, vans, and 9C1-optioned Caprices, the L05 was also used with the following vehicles:

 

Maybe it's a regional thing, and maybe every technician that I've worked alongside has been wrong, but every GM dealership that I have worked at referred to the body styles as such. In fact, I've got a 1987 GMC truck drivability and emissions service manual (for the R/V models) sitting next to me right now that has in parentheses "Includes 1988 C/K Models". I'll agree that if you go by the 5th digit in the VIN from '81 and up, every fullsize regulare cab or extended cab pickup is C or K, but that's just how I've always been told and referred to them. Maybe I'm wrong, but I sure as heck don't put alot of faith in Wikipedia.

 

Travis

Posted

You can choose to ignore the Wikipedia info, but they aren't alone in their explanation of the C/K truck.

 

Click

 

Click

 

I recall my father (who worked in the tooling office) telling me that the carryover trucks from the '87 styling would be called R/Vs.

 

Model breakdown in the 80s (& mostly still in use)

 

TK10703 (my 1st truck)

 

T = GMC

 

K = 4 x 4

 

1 = 1/2 ton

 

07 = short box

 

03 = regular cab

Posted
Includes 1988 C/K Models".

 

After we started building the GMT400 in Dec' of '86, we referred to the new trucks by their designation GMT400. We never called the new trucks C/Ks. I returned to the plant in '97, just before our changeover to the GMT800. It was then that the powres to be decided the trucks needed model names :rolleyes: .

 

I wish people on here could take the time to refer to their truck(s) by the proper term. None of this NNBS nonsense. What are they going to call the K2XX? NNNBS :fume: (again).

Posted
C and K are still used in the VIN to designate 2 and 4 wheel drive.

 

Yes :rolleyes:

Posted

I didn't know anything about that. I was thinking GC was a brand. I had never heard of the "thin oil myth". IIRC, the oil weights/viscosity explanation was taught in Grade 9 auto shop. The 1st prefix before the W is the viscosity @ low temps & the suffix is the weight @ a higher temp. I'm sure you'll post what those temps are. I think the low test temp' is -25* F.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I was the GM of a Lincoln Mercury dealership back in the 80's. The service lot was always full with "broken" ones. Plenty of transmissions, power windows and a/c repairs. The only one I'd consider owning would be the Marauder at this point and it certainly wouldn't be a daily driver.  My 2025 GMC Sierra 1500 Denali Ultimate is my "Lincoln Town Car" in my retirement. I want all the "stuff". Big infotainment screens, one touch power windows, Supercruise (I won't buy another vehicle without it), hands free pretty much everything. I'm going to swap my current truck for a 2027 Yukon Denali Ultimate so I can have the air suspension and surround vision recording along with all the other "stuff". 
    • Yep mine is on backorder also.
    • The Denali Ultimate's grille is tinted, but the "regular' Denali has a bright chrome grille like the current models.
    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...