Jump to content

Tornado Fuel Saver


Recommended Posts

Posted

I m thinking about installing the Tornado Fuel Saver but i m not to sure if its even worth it. I ve herd that the gm engines already do the same thing with the way the intake is setup. Just looking for some feed back from anyone who has tried this thing or knows anyone who has.

 

Thanks.

Posted
I m thinking about installing the Tornado Fuel Saver

 

 

 

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

 

If there's anything you should not do in your whole life, it's buying a Tornado.

Posted

I wouldn't. I can't cite the exact episode here, but Mythbusters did a whole episode on 'ways to increase fuel economy' in engines. They checked out a Tornado-like product and found that it made the average MPG a little worse. (Probably hindered intake air flow?) You might be able to find it on Youtube. You can also find info with a google search of something like "Tornado fuel saver scam" or similar.

Posted

I remember reading somewhere that the guy who invented the tornado was sued for false claims. Now if you really think about it if any of these so called fuel savers work dont you think all the major vehicle manufactors would be all over this or already have? Only thing you will be doing is fatting the inventors bank account. PURE JUNK.

Posted

yeah i bought one back in 2002 and tried it out on my stock 01 blazer, and i got it for 50 bucks, and it was a waste, i drove on it for 4 months and didnt notice any difference. The best way to increase MPG is with a good tune.

Posted

I think that those only benefit a carburated vehicle because they can help mix the air and fuel inside the intake. Anything that is port fuel injected (so about all new vehicles now) will get no benefit, and sometimes it will result in worse performance. In my opinion instead of buying one of those for $80 or so, buy some chrome door handles.

 

Chrome HP boost = Tornado HP boost but looks better!

Posted

Get a Throttle body spacer instead. I can whittle one out of wood for ya' for free.

 

 

 

.....End Sarcasm....

 

Do a search..its been discussed.

Posted

i bought one and i bought it instead of buying a new MAF ...the old one had no screen so i bought it instead of buying a new one..and i can actualy say i got some gains out of it..and mpg went up to were it shouldve been if i bought a new MAF..but everyone i hear from says it sux so unless ur maf doesnt have a screen and ur kindve cheap like me lol dont get one

Posted

this and TB spacers are one of the most useless things ever... on a DRY flow manifold, why does swirling the air matter? it doesnt... the only reason the Vortec heads somewhat help is because the swirl design is AFTER the fuel and air come together.

 

 

 

save your money for something worth while like filling up your gas tank.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Do you think this width might affect the chalk test with a higher pressure closer to 65psi? I think lowering the pressure makes sense to get the tread to lay flatter
    • I had an alternator fail that was shorted internally in such a direct fashion in addition to the larger gauge cables that it appeared like a VERY dead battery. Granted I think the car did power up, it definitely wouldn't start.   Rodent damage to wiring?
    • ... I don't think he could.
    • Using experience to justify bad advice is lazy and typical of someone incapable of articulating why their advice is prudent.    This immediately sets off the BS alert and the advice that followed certainly qualified.   Asking an idiot for help getting out of dumb situations because he is an expert... at getting himself into dumb situations.   Unless I've been living in an alternate universe - the first thing everyone does when getting into a sticky situation is shift to a higher gear 🤨.   Of course not, the torque multiplication, mechanical advantage and finer control typically afforded by the lower gear is far better suited for this scenario.   There ARE scenarios where a higher gear MIGHT be appropriate determined more by the drivers ability to control EXCESSIVE wheel spin versus applying torque to the ground.
    • I'm not sure I agree with "extreme" low speed, high torque sentiment here with regards to the prescribed use of low range. How about...whenever it's needed?   A 2.72:1 transfer case and whatever differential gears these Silverados have (3.42's, maybe?) aren't producing "extremely" low crawl speeds. Or insanely high torque multiplication. Even with the 1st gear in these newer transmissions. But it does provide mechanical advantage and potentially better control at slower speeds. And with extra weight or towing, I think it adds mechanical sympathy for the truck as well.   Plus, traction control and the other assists generally turn off when you shift into low range. Those aren't needed here, they'll work against you if you need wheel spin. In high range you'll need to figure out how to turn off the various modes those assists provide. Depending on the vehicle, those things don't all automatically turn off or turn completely off.   While I agree that a farmer might have some great practical experience, a recommendation to "always" using one gear isn't very informed advice. If the farmer had said WHY and could explain the physics behind his prescriptive "always" I'd definitely listen. The way he's described here makes it sounds like he could either be uninformed or is telling everyone what worked for him, not necessarily that there could be a more advantageous way about things.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...