Jump to content

Bluetooth Options For 2008 Silverado


Recommended Posts

Posted
Scott, where in the devil did you get that chart?!?!

 

I've been looking for that information for MONTHS and gotten nothing.

 

 

You can get the same information from TIS2WEB:

http://tis2web.service.gm.com/tis2web

 

Just enter in any VIN and choose the VCIM. I just noticed that 2007 and 2008 models don't have VCIM info in the system for some reason...not sure if some vehicles were left out or what.

 

 

I just flipped through the pages that link goes to and thats exactly what I just did at the dealership yesterday and we got the message "Programming Successful"

 

Are you saying that because I put in my 2007 VIN it actually didn't correctly do the setup, so I need to enter a 2009 VIN to activate a Bluetooth VCIM because they only got released in 2009?

 

I ask because OnStar keeps telling me they are getting the error message on their end "bad model year software error"

 

Bad meaning it wasnt matching my VIN 2007?

 

Bad meaning it wasnt matching the software from the year they first produced BT VCIM software?

 

Answering this might help a few of us......

  • Replies 735
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
Are you saying that because I put in my 2007 VIN it actually didn't correctly do the setup, so I need to enter a 2009 VIN to activate a Bluetooth VCIM because they only got released in 2009?

 

I ask because OnStar keeps telling me they are getting the error message on their end "bad model year software error"

 

Bad meaning it wasnt matching my VIN 2007?

 

Bad meaning it wasnt matching the software from the year they first produced BT VCIM software?

 

Answering this might help a few of us......

 

After doing a bit more looking in TIS, I would agree that's probably the key to this whole thing. We need to use a 2009/2010 VIN to pull up the appropriate software that also matches the specific type of headunit installed in the vehicle. If I had to guess, the reason RayGMC was able to get his OnStar activated without too much trouble is because the used VCIM he purchased came from a vehicle with a matching audio system in it already.

 

It also explains why I've been having problems getting OnStar to load the right software into my unit. My truck originally came with a 6CD changer in the dash, and I replaced it with an OEM Navigation unit. OnStar doesn't know this, nor does GM's database that pulls up information based on how the truck was built at the factory.

Posted
Are you saying that because I put in my 2007 VIN it actually didn't correctly do the setup, so I need to enter a 2009 VIN to activate a Bluetooth VCIM because they only got released in 2009?

 

I ask because OnStar keeps telling me they are getting the error message on their end "bad model year software error"

 

Bad meaning it wasnt matching my VIN 2007?

 

Bad meaning it wasnt matching the software from the year they first produced BT VCIM software?

 

Answering this might help a few of us......

 

After doing a bit more looking in TIS, I would agree that's probably the key to this whole thing. We need to use a 2009/2010 VIN to pull up the appropriate software that also matches the specific type of headunit installed in the vehicle. If I had to guess, the reason RayGMC was able to get his OnStar activated without too much trouble is because the used VCIM he purchased came from a vehicle with a matching audio system in it already.

 

It also explains why I've been having problems getting OnStar to load the right software into my unit. My truck originally came with a 6CD changer in the dash, and I replaced it with an OEM Navigation unit. OnStar doesn't know this, nor does GM's database that pulls up information based on how the truck was built at the factory.

 

 

Well after going to the dealer for my 3rd ONSA TIS2WEB setup procedure (no charge) I would tend to agree with you Charlie. On* is telling me yet again they are getting error message "Invalid make or model software" and they cannot complete the download setup from their end.

 

Im confused though.

 

Are you saying when we got CW to programm the VCIMs we should have used a 09 VIN or when we do the ONSA TIS2WEB set up we should have used a 09 VIN??

 

My Truck has had navigation radio all the time and CW knew that when he programmed the VCIM.

Posted
Scott, where in the devil did you get that chart?!?!

 

I've been looking for that information for MONTHS and gotten nothing.

 

 

You can get the same information from TIS2WEB:

http://tis2web.service.gm.com/tis2web

 

Just enter in any VIN and choose the VCIM. I just noticed that 2007 and 2008 models don't have VCIM info in the system for some reason...not sure if some vehicles were left out or what.

 

 

 

I just put in our VCIM part number 20783877 and TIS2WEB page says invalid part number....WTF?

Posted
Im confused though.

 

Are you saying when we got CW to programm the VCIMs we should have used a 09 VIN or when we do the ONSA TIS2WEB set up we should have used a 09 VIN??

 

My Truck has had navigation radio all the time and CW knew that when he programmed the VCIM.

 

When Chris did the programming it was necessary to use the VIN from our vehicles because that is what makes the vehicle and module recognize each other. I'm saying that we should be using an 09/10 VIN to pull up the proper software to flash in during ONSA. I don't think that what Chris did would have been dependent on the audio system.

 

I just put in our VCIM part number 20783877 and TIS2WEB page says invalid part number....WTF?

 

That is a GMSPO hardware part number; the TIS site is looking for SPS software calibration part numbers.

Posted
Im confused though.

 

Are you saying when we got CW to programm the VCIMs we should have used a 09 VIN or when we do the ONSA TIS2WEB set up we should have used a 09 VIN??

 

My Truck has had navigation radio all the time and CW knew that when he programmed the VCIM.

 

When Chris did the programming it was necessary to use the VIN from our vehicles because that is what makes the vehicle and module recognize each other. I'm saying that we should be using an 09/10 VIN to pull up the proper software to flash in during ONSA. I don't think that what Chris did would have been dependent on the audio system.

 

I just put in our VCIM part number 20783877 and TIS2WEB page says invalid part number....WTF?

 

That is a GMSPO hardware part number; the TIS site is looking for SPS software calibration part numbers.

 

 

So Charlie do you figure its worth a shot going back to my Dealer see if he will do the ONSA TIS2WEB setup with an 09 VIN from a vehicle with same options as me?

Posted

I am willing to go to the dealer and try it out next week. I figure they owe me a free set-up since the screwed me last time I was in. I can't get there before Friday though. Anybody got any good ideas on where to get an '09 VIN? Let me know if you guys think it is worth giving this a try.

 

-Kip

Posted
So Charlie do you figure its worth a shot going back to my Dealer see if he will do the ONSA TIS2WEB setup with an 09 VIN from a vehicle with same options as me?

 

Entirely possible; that is exactly what I plan to do at this point: get the dealer to use their Tech2 to read out what hardware ID is in the VCIM I have, then use a 2009 or 2010 VIN in that TIS menu to find the correct software/calibration part number that matches up with both the VCIM and the audio system in the vehicle for them to use during ONSA.

 

If my suspicions are correct, it shouldn't screw up what Chris White already did, and if it does screw something up I'll just have to track him down and see about getting him to fix it (since it would appear he's either out of business or just on vacation, I'll just hope I can get in touch with him).

Posted
I am willing to go to the dealer and try it out next week. I figure they owe me a free set-up since the screwed me last time I was in. I can't get there before Friday though. Anybody got any good ideas on where to get an '09 VIN? Let me know if you guys think it is worth giving this a try.

 

-Kip

 

You should be able to just pull the VIN off any brand new truck on your dealer's lot for this purpose.

Posted
I am willing to go to the dealer and try it out next week. I figure they owe me a free set-up since the screwed me last time I was in. I can't get there before Friday though. Anybody got any good ideas on where to get an '09 VIN? Let me know if you guys think it is worth giving this a try.

 

-Kip

 

Find a truck for sale online that closely matches your truck with same options maybe.......thats what Im doing

Posted

Just to be clear, reprogramming / reflashing with a different VIN could get you the correct software / calibration. However, I'm not sure if using a different VIN for the ONSA / onstar account learning is a good idea. This could link your VCIM module with someone else's onstar account. Not sure about that, as I believe each VCIM has a unique hardware ID (kinda like a computer modem), which they use to link your truck to your onstar account.

 

Scott

Posted
Just to be clear, reprogramming / reflashing with a different VIN could get you the correct software / calibration. However, I'm not sure if using a different VIN for the ONSA / onstar account learning is a good idea. This could link your VCIM module with someone else's onstar account. Not sure about that, as I believe each VCIM has a unique hardware ID (kinda like a computer modem), which they use to link your truck to your onstar account.

 

Scott

 

Scott,

 

To be equally clear, I'm not suggesting that the VCIM needs to be flashed with a VIN for a different vehicle -- actually quite the contrary. The proper VIN for the vehicle still needs to be present in the VCIM for it to work properly.

 

All I'm suggesting is that we obviously need to use the VIN from a newer bluetooth-equipped vehicle (regardless of what else it has in it equipment wise) in order to access the menu in TIS2WEB with the software calibration part numbers as you posted in chart form earlier. From there it's just a matter of matching up the correct VCIM hardware ID and the type of audio system in the older vehicle being programmed in order to choose the correct software calibration part number that needs to be flashed into the VCIM.

Posted

Guess my search is on for a 2009 with similar options. I wonder how close it has to be? Found one that is pretty close, but I have a crew cab and it is an extended cab. Close enough? I am willing to give it a try. Let me know if somebody gets around to it before I can get to the dealer on Friday. Good luck to everyone trying it this way. I haven't had Chris White work on my VCIM yet, so maybe it will give us an answer if it is required or not. Here's to hope!

Posted
Guess my search is on for a 2009 with similar options. I wonder how close it has to be? Found one that is pretty close, but I have a crew cab and it is an extended cab. Close enough? I am willing to give it a try. Let me know if somebody gets around to it before I can get to the dealer on Friday. Good luck to everyone trying it this way. I haven't had Chris White work on my VCIM yet, so maybe it will give us an answer if it is required or not. Here's to hope!

 

Have you guys seen these AfterMarket OEM style Navigation Radios?........very close to OEM but you get built in BlueTooth and everythings on the radio display. Mapping Geo data is on an SD card so no more GM Nav Discs.

 

If you're looking to add Navigation and BT this might be worth considering.

 

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2007-2008-2...ht_13087wt_1199

Posted
Guess my search is on for a 2009 with similar options. I wonder how close it has to be? Found one that is pretty close, but I have a crew cab and it is an extended cab. Close enough? I am willing to give it a try. Let me know if somebody gets around to it before I can get to the dealer on Friday. Good luck to everyone trying it this way. I haven't had Chris White work on my VCIM yet, so maybe it will give us an answer if it is required or not. Here's to hope!

 

Have you guys seen these AfterMarket OEM style Navigation Radios?........very close to OEM but you get built in BlueTooth and everythings on the radio display. Mapping Geo data is on an SD card so no more GM Nav Discs.

 

If you're looking to add Navigation and BT this might be worth considering.

 

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2007-2008-2...ht_13087wt_1199

 

 

There was a thread about those in the main forum a week or so ago; there were a couple links to reviews of the unit that weren't so positive.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
    • 2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...