Jump to content

Console Lid Swap


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2002 Silverado LT with the center console. The lid on this is very slick. Anything placed there flies off. My wife has a 2005 Suburban LT with the center console also, but the lid is recessed and has a rubber insert which makes it much more usable. Cell phones, sunglasses, etc can be placed there temporarily and don't go zinging off in to space.

 

The lids don't mount the same. I don't think they are interchangeable. It looks like the lids are mounted to the console liner. Is there a way to swap pieces and parts to get the more usable lid?

 

Thanks

Posted

I think I'd hit my local boneyard and just find a Suburban console to swap into it. Probably easier and cheaper than trying to retrofit something into yours. Just a thought.

Posted

Nope.............GM in its wisdom and cost cutting got rid of the rubber insert!

Also note the whole armrest/console deal is 1 piece so swapping the lid

is near impossible with out some imagination and major surgery !

Buying a new unit from another year is $pendy at $450 !

Posted
Nope.............GM in its wisdom and cost cutting got rid of the rubber insert!

Also note the whole armrest/console deal is 1 piece so swapping the lid

is near impossible with out some imagination and major surgery !

Buying a new unit from another year is $pendy at $450 !

 

 

Hmmm, so they de-contented a 2002 from a 2005 to save money? I suppose they needed the money to pay for that time machine huh? My 2000 also did NOT have any rubber insert.

Posted

Funny guys................My 01 had the rubber mat. While the replacement console

I got replaced under warranty (latch broke) didn't have the mat.

My 04 didn't have the mat either.................

Posted

I had the same problem. I would put my cell phone in that little tray and hit the brakes and spend 10 minutes after I got to my destination trying to fish it out from in between the seats. My solution was some of that rubber sink mat stuff. Here's some pics of the stuff and with it in the console:

post-20843-1209787509_thumb.jpg

post-20843-1209787243_thumb.jpg

The stuff under the mat in the truck is duct tape. You could probably use some mounting method that blends in a little more.

post-20843-1209787243_thumb.jpg

post-20843-1209787509_thumb.jpg

post-20843-1209787243_thumb.jpg

post-20843-1209787509_thumb.jpg

post-20843-1209787243_thumb.jpg

post-20843-1209787509_thumb.jpg

Posted
I had the same problem. I would put my cell phone in that little tray and hit the brakes and spend 10 minutes after I got to my destination trying to fish it out from in between the seats. My solution was some of that rubber sink mat stuff. Here's some pics of the stuff and with it in the console:

post-20843-1209787509_thumb.jpg

post-20843-1209787243_thumb.jpg

The stuff under the mat in the truck is duct tape. You could probably use some mounting method that blends in a little more.

 

Thanks for the pics. I think my wife has some of that stuff. I'll look for some clear double sided tape. The console swap is still an option, but if it's too expensive, I'll just use the shelf liner.

 

Thanks

Posted

if you can find it locally or patient enough to order online you can get a rubberized coating which you can spray or brush/paint on.. i beileve another member did something fairly similar on their console with good results.

Posted

This might help, but it is gonna cost you....http://www.jpcustoms.com/store/customer/home.php?cat=874

Posted
Funny guys................My 01 had the rubber mat. While the replacement console

I got replaced under warranty (latch broke) didn't have the mat.

My 04 didn't have the mat either.................

The '03-'07s with bucket seats had a rubber mat in the middle of the console lid,Someone must have taken out the mat from your '04,It should of had one.

The '99-'02s with bucket seats did not have a rubber mat,and like zsk said,things tend to slide off.

Posted
This might help, but it is gonna cost you....http://www.jpcustoms.com/store/customer/home.php?cat=874

 

 

Thanks for the info. I see thsat ist's for a 2003 and up. That likely won't fit mine. I'll try the shelf liner and see how it works out.

Posted
This might help, but it is gonna cost you....http://www.jpcustoms.com/store/customer/home.php?cat=874

 

 

Thanks for the info. I see thsat ist's for a 2003 and up. That likely won't fit mine. I'll try the shelf liner and see how it works out.

 

Another possibility. Many auto parts stores and big retailers sell a silicon mat that is designed to 'grip' your phone while it lays on the dash. Probably wouldn't be hard to trim to fit. Just a suggestion.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,921 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...