Jump to content

Silverado Vs Sierra


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
GMC for 2007 to 2009 have a much better looking front end, the Chev's have a gosh awful looking grill and bumper for those years, looks like an over sized handle bar mustache. Also GMC is made in Canada and the USA, Chevs are made in Thailand :sigh:

 

Sarcasm I hope?

 

This has been discussed over and over and the same jokes are made over and over (rejected parts, etc). Bottom line, if GM had to cut one line of trucks it wouldn't be the Chevy line. Go with something that won't look like an antique in about 3 years when GM is bankrupt and forced to sell nothing but Chevy and Cadillac. Yes that is speculation.

 

 

If they go bankrupt, I doubt they'd sell Cadillac since Cadillac is an overpriced Chevy. Unless of course, you can convince the overage joe that it is better, so they make better margins on it.

 

Bottom line, they are basically the same ride. In the past, I liked the Chevy look better than the GMC. Then in the past 2 model turns, I despise the Silevrado front clip (my opinion), so I bought a GMC this round. I don't know why the Silverado didn't get the front clip from the Avalanche. I loved the look of that ride, just not practical for my application.

Posted

GMC dates back farther than Chevy, GMC dates back to 1902. GMC has not always used chevy motors and have been heavier duty trucks. In the late 50s and 60s GMC used Pontiac and Buick engines and had larger engines than chevy. Its only in the last 30 or so years that they have been the same. I know, that means nothing to you young guys :seeya:

Posted

Believe it or not I did know that, I love GMC trucks, they're all my dad used to buy. Now he has a Ford, actually a nice one too, but still a Ford. But I have a book on the history of GMC at my house.

Posted

They're the same thing. Just cosmetic differences. :seeya:

 

I do find it odd that I see maybe 5% GMC's on the road around here, but it seems there's 75% GMC's on here.

:dunno:

Posted
GMC for 2007 to 2009 have a much better looking front end, the Chev's have a gosh awful looking grill and bumper for those years, looks like an over sized handle bar mustache. Also GMC is made in Canada and the USA, Chevs are made in Thailand :seeya:

 

Sarcasm I hope?

 

This has been discussed over and over and the same jokes are made over and over (rejected parts, etc). Bottom line, if GM had to cut one line of trucks it wouldn't be the Chevy line. Go with something that won't look like an antique in about 3 years when GM is bankrupt and forced to sell nothing but Chevy and Cadillac. Yes that is speculation.

 

 

If they go bankrupt, I doubt they'd sell Cadillac since Cadillac is an overpriced Chevy. Unless of course, you can convince the overage joe that it is better, so they make better margins on it.

 

Bottom line, they are basically the same ride. In the past, I liked the Chevy look better than the GMC. Then in the past 2 model turns, I despise the Silevrado front clip (my opinion), so I bought a GMC this round. I don't know why the Silverado didn't get the front clip from the Avalanche. I loved the look of that ride, just not practical for my application.

 

 

 

I agree about the front clip, the last two trucks I owned were Chevs and these last years I have to agree they are butt ugly up front, so I also went to the GMC for 2009. All the same truck except for cosmetics, which means lots IMO!

Posted
The fenders and bedsides are different also. I think that's about it.

 

The only sheetmetal they share is the cab/doors and tailgate.

 

And yes..GMC's are made with superior parts and all rejected GMC parts get used on the Chevy's.

:seeya:

 

 

GMC=Generic Made Chevy

Posted
The GMC get 5 more MPG.

7 if your name is Jeff. :seeya:

 

Of course GMC is superior... any dummy would know that. :dunno::lol::D

Posted

Well here is the truth about this subject. The GMC crew cab is a glorified grocery getter for the white collar soccer dad. The Silverado is a working mans truck. :seeya::dunno::lol::D

Posted

I guess I'm against the majority here. I prefer the look of the Silverados by far. I've always thought that the '88 and newer GMC grilles were fugly, and this generation of trucks is no different.

Posted
I guess I'm against the majority here. I prefer the look of the Silverados by far. I've always thought that the '88 and newer GMC grilles were fugly, and this generation of trucks is no different.

Look at it this way... Between the two, we all have a good reason not to buy a Ford or Dodge!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The not as clean as one would assume theme with the new engine oil, that reminds me of comments over the years with mechanics not always being so on board with filling an oil filter, not from the center anyway due to that typically being the clean side of the filter, danger of some contaminant falling into the filter if not careful but the realization now that the oil may not be as pure as one had assumed it would surely be. Yes it would be possible to fill from the small holes but that means messing with something to prop open the anti drain back valve if the filter is so equipped and not damage that valve in the process. Me, I have hardly ever prefilled an engine oil filter however I have prefilled diesel fuel filters with a filter on a fuel bulk tank and for anyone that has messed with diesel engines with filters and units that have a limited or no way of priming them, putting on a dry filter is a bad day to say the least with those crappy systems. But anyway back to not so clean engine oil, indeed perhaps its not so bad after all that I have not made a practice of prefilling oil filters.    As Grumpy Bear commented on keeping things clean, that I really have to wonder what the typical practice is at a dealer or any other shop that changes engine oil, do they make sure to wipe or wash off the oil plug and certainly if it fell into some gunk or onto a dirty floor, or that they wiped the filter mounting flange and didn't go and use some dirty rag and end up adding dirt to the inside of the head of the filter mount. Or be careless in how they stored or handled the new filter and if they were bumping into items under the vehicle with the filter opening facing up and having dirt drop right into the filter and if so right into the threaded center that is on the clean side. The top side, did they clean away the built up gunk that may be around the filler before removing the cap or to be really careful at that point that something right close to the filler hole that was hidden under the caps flange won't fall into the engine. Or did they clean the funnel or was that just laying there covered in oil from the oil change before and dust kicked up from sweeping the floor stuck to the oil and now that will go running into the next persons engine due to just not cleaning the funnel as "they won't know anyway" attitude as that young guy is more worried about taking a break so he can go outside and smoke a joint. Just random points that came to mind when I think about what some hired personnel may do that the shop foreman has no idea of or perhaps the whole attitude of some shops may be "eh ... who cares, they will never know the difference anyway".  
    • $3.69 for 87 octane.   $4.24 for Diesel in town.
    • On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
    • I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually recalibrate the speedometer it just changes the wheel speed sensor inputs to the computer. The truck still thinks it has stock tires.
    • I apologize, I missed this post, at risk of going off CURRENT TOPIC.   I'm not saying it is BS, I'm questioning how much information is being held back. GM is NOT going to spell out exactly every parameter in the algorithm. Liability, intellectual property, etc.    I'm not naive enough to believe that it is as simple as revolutions, coolant temperature, miles, time; are you?    I don't do irrational either, and boiling the OLM down to four simple values that I could code in an afternoon (I'm not a coder) is irrational - unless it suits your agenda to ignore it. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...