Jump to content

Is This A Sneak Peak Of The Next Gen Sierra?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Lately GM's bumpers (the other makes as well?) are getting lower w/ each model redesign, is this due to gov't safety standards? There was some whing by the IIHS testing SUVs & cars from each OEM & demonstrating the differences in bumper heights & the damage/cost related to a collision.

 

The reason I say this, I think the sheet metal may see production, but the bumper is doubtful IMO.

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

i think bumper height has more to do with aerodynamics then anything...although there are laws in place to stop being from having their bumper 6 feet off the ground

Posted
i think bumper height has more to do with aerodynamics then anything

 

 

This is why. There was some study announced recently by one of the auto safety groups that made the ground breaking discovery that when a SUV/truck hits a conventional car, it does more damage than a car vs. car accident (go figure :thumbs:). It didn't say anything about overall safety in these crashes but with crash technology what it is today, I'd say in most instances a fullsize car is probably just as safe to crash in, though it will probably end up with more damage (perfectly ok by me if I can still walk away). Still not sold on small car safety, even against another car. Go to youtube and search Mercedes vs. Smart car for why.

Posted

Overall I like it, but I highly doubt that front bumper (or lack thereof) will make it into production.

 

 

I'm also not digging the inside of the bed. The hour-glass shape and the fact that it appears to be 100% plastic. Reminds me of when the Avalaches first came out and the majority of people hated the extra cladding.

Posted

Ahh another gazillion spent on a concept not hitting the road,

not liking grille frame either looks to much like ford not that ford is a bad thing.

 

Headlights and front fenders are screaming honda look-a-like.

Posted

IDK, I will be in the market for a new truck in 3 years...so we will see what I get. I like where they are going with this but i highly doubt it will EVER see production. That would have horrible MPG and GM would never release it. Sad.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

That is as much of a production truck as the ZR2 concept from last year was. Not gonna happen.

 

Besides, it's mostly a GMT900 with a few light tweaks. K2 will be a farther cry from the GMT900 than this I would think.

  • 1 year later...
  • 3 months later...
Posted

I absolutely LOVE the looks of that!! I want one!! I hope that truck DOES go into production.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
    • 87 down as low as $5.14 here... winning!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...