Jump to content

Active Fuel Management


Recommended Posts

Posted

No and what the heck is "VLOM"?? Why would you want to reduce fuel mileage at $4+ a gallon?

 

Has anyone disabled the AFM by just unplugging the VLOM and if so what were the results?
Posted
No and what the heck is "VLOM"?? Why would you want to reduce fuel mileage at $4+ a gallon?

+1

 

I always heard if you messed with your VLOM, you would go blind. :)

Posted

i think the active fuel managment hurts mpgs, my new truck is a lot worse on fuel than any of the other trucks ive had. it is the 6.0 but its like 4-6 mpg worse than the 5.3's, plus it never stays in 4cyl mod longer than 20 sec and un locks the torque converter every time it changes which jumps the RPMs up 300 rpm each time and in turn causes the trans temp to rise

Posted

If you unplug it, yes it will disable it. Yes it will set a check engine light. It also could send truck into reduced power mode. Never tried it. I would get a program to disable the system if you are interested in doing so.

Posted

Never heard of anyone unplugging it, but tuning it out will indeed increase fuel mileage 95% of the time. My dad say between 1-2 mpg increase, the only time I can see a possibility of loosing mpg may be cruising on the high way if it were running 4 cyl the whole time.

Posted

Disabled mine with a programmer and haven't noticed any decrease at all.

Posted

I noticed a decrease in mpg when I disabled AFM for testing. But I suspect the results have more to do with terrain and speed. It is up and down hills around here and AFM kicks in alot on the downhill sections. So in my case it is good for an increase of about 1 to 1.5 mpg with it activated.

Posted

The VLOM is the valve lifter oil manifold that is mounted under your intake manifold. It uses 4 solenoids to shut off the cylinders that are used for the active fuel management. As far as i can tell,there are no dtc codes listed for the afm. Also,does'nt the vehicle use the AFM to go into reduced power mode or does it use a different method?

Posted

change the settings with an autocal or other programmer. I did that to mine so it only comes on above 60 mph instead of kicking on around town, which was getting annoying by the way. Much better now with the BB tune.

Posted

I did unplug the AFM today,just to try it. The truck did go into reduced power mode and also the tranny did not shift correctly. I plugged it back in and the truck is back to normal. I guess i will have to get a programmer to disable the system. Any suggestions which programmers are best and why?

Posted

I can only speak to the Blackbear Tune in this situation. I had a Superchips programmer on my 2005 Sierra which did not have AFM and it was too generic. Never really noticed much of a difference. With the BB tune, I was able to have Justin adjust shift points, turn off AFM below 60 mph, and leave the tow/haul button as is so I will not have to remove the tune when towing. There are some discussions on the Diablo programmer on this site, but I have not had any personal experience with them. Good luck.

Posted

I had the AFM on my '11 Sierra rcsb 2wd 5.3L programmed out. Loss of fuel mileage is just not significant. Averaging just a tad under under 20mpg overall on an engine that only has 1600mi on it (6spd with 3.42 rear). When out on open roads (not interstates) usually drive 65-75mph. Do have a soft tonneau installed.

Posted

Or you could remove it physically! and avoid the hassle down the road..

 

I read some have replaced AFM lifters with LS7 lifters, change the guides and other parts....+ disabling it with a programmer, BB is popular here.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Actually, it probably was the brakes.  It's weird the way the messages came across, but I took it to the dealer thinking that something was wrong with the sensor and in fact, the rear brakes were shot.  What I don't understand is why the messages never said, your brake pads are low.  First I got the message I posted above, taking about new pads being detected.  Then I got a message saying that the system needed repaired.  It never said, change your brake pads.
    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
    • Thank you. I'll give it a try 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...