Jump to content

New money


k1500chevy97

Recommended Posts

Posted

it should have been done a long #### time ago,  every great nation has great looking money  but we have boring ass greenbacks.

 

From a friend that works at the east coast mint, he said they should roll out around second quarter 2003

Posted
the reason they would be switching to color is because the current redesign must be easier to copy than they thought. the colors are fraud protection, more colors, harders to duplicate. (haven't read the article yet, if they explain it)
Posted

As the R.E.M song goes, "It's the end of the world as we know it".

 

 

The Green is what makes our :jester: Currency so unique.

 

 

Now we're just gonna look like Austrailians, or some other Foreign Country. :D

 

 

Unless, they use Red, White and Blue. (Now that wouldn't be so bad).  :lol:

Posted

It is going to be done for a couple of reasons.

 

1) harder for counterfitters to duplicate.

 

2) More patriotic, I.E. Red, White, and Blue.

Posted
I think it is about time.  Out currency is outdated and any person with a little knowledge can counterfit it with the right equipment.  I really like the monies used by Australia and Canada, I have a few bills from those countries.  They look great.   :thumb: Red, white, and blue colors would be neat  :jester:
Posted

can anyone say MONOPOLY MONEY  :jester:

 

:D  :lol:  :puke:  :flag:  :lol:

Posted

As a Canadian we are used to coloured money.  It may be a little harder to counterfeit but it is still a problem up here.

 

The main advantage is when you are out at a bar late at night or early morning you can easily tell the difference between a $5 and a $20 just by the colour.

 

I think the worst thing we did to our money was to get rid of the $1 and $2 bill and replaced them with $1 coin the loonie and $2 coin the toonie.  

 

If you want to see some wild looking money check out cash from the Bahamas.

Posted

2) More patriotic, I.E. Red, White, and Blue.

 

Cool!  White money!!!  would seem easy to counterfeit...lol! :jester:

 

I think the worst thing we did to our money was to get rid of the $1 and $2 bill and replaced them with $1 coin the loonie and $2 coin the toonie.  

 

Tell me about it, we got a good chuckle about that on our trip up through Prince Albert.

Posted

If it's all worth the same, and it still spends the same, who cares.  I'll spend it either way.

 

And it probably will cut down on the amount of times someone accidently uses the wrong bill, i.e. a 5 instead of a 20, or vice versa.

 

Who cares what color it is, let's just spend it!!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I would argue that GMPartsDirect has that info wrong.    The service manual for R+R the lower arm and for adjusting camber/caster, none of the steps say to discard and replace the nut or the bolt.    The only part that gets discarded is the plastic cam adjustment retainer that is in the eccentric from the factory.     The LCA nut torque spec is: First Pass: 180 Y (133 lb ft) Final Pass: 90 –105 Degrees    
    • The filtering to wear relationship goes like this:      'Relative Engine Life "Factor" new divided by the factor old. So 8/3= 2.67. That result is the multiplier thus if a motor had an effective life of 100K using a filter with a 45 micron rating at a Beta ratio of 75 then a filter with a micron rating of 10 at a Beta of 75 would improve expected engine life to 267,000 miles.    Wear metals are an indirect indicator. Less is better and the motor lives longer but there isn't a multiplier like there is for filtration so well documented. Most of that has to do with the sensitivity of the wear metals tests themselves. They read a 'slice' of the spectrum but not the absolute values for the entire spectrum. So a general indicator that is used WITH the results of other tests. Two others considered in this post. Trending is very important.    There is also the influence of corrosive wear which may be seen in the wear metals but separate from load based or viscosity mitigated indication. It's a small graph but the gray line is wear vs the TBN/TAN crossover. Not as useful as it used to be as there are now new chemistries for acid remediation that don't show up in standard UAO testing. They will catch up or be found liars. Only two possible outcomes, eh?             
    • One thing that comes up over and over is that the torque converters are the weak link. Many of the failed transmissions have the same thing in common. The torque converter grenades and then metal torque converter shards end up destroying the transmission. One of the best things you can do is if your transmission is still fully functional, change out to one of the aftermarket billet torque converters. There are several good choices mentioned in different threads here to make your choice. After that, then you can decide about trans tuning. My trans failed at around 95,000 miles. It got replaced under the GM protection plan. The remanufactured trans comes with a 100,000 mile /3 year warranty. I still have just under 1 year left. So far, so good. As long as it's still working good next year, an aftermarket torque converter is going to get installed early spring. If the trans and OEM torque converter fail by then, I will get it replaced under warranty and immediately have an aftermarket torque converter installed. A warranty replacement trans of a replacement trans will no longer have the warranty so I will bulletproof it from the get go.
    • You got'a be cooking right now. Just looked at the weather map. Yuck!    We are right back to $4 today.    
    • Pushing $4.00 a gallon in most places, still $3.75 in town but it's going to spike tomorrow for sure.   Diesel back up to $4.60-5.00.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...