Jump to content

Toyota Sienna LE


RyanbabZ71

Recommended Posts

Posted

The best thing is what works for you. If the wife is happy and the kids fit good then do it. Loading the kids in a car is hard, so a van woould work good. Just watch the auto doors so the kids don't run out in traffic. I think new would be the way to go, so you don't start with someone else's problems. Good luck happy new year

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

For what its worth, I work in parts dept at one of the larger Toyota dealers in the midwest. While my vehicles are all GM, I wouldn't hesitate for one second to buy a Toyota. We rarely have any issues with the Siennas. I think you will be really happy with it and there are some nice features on it that other manufactures don't have. I totally understand your "brand loyalty guilt" for lack of better term but if a van will be better for you then I don't think you can go wrong with the Sienna.

Posted

Ryan, I have had 3 minivans over the years when my 3 kids were growing up. 2 Oldsmobiles and a Honda. They were the most practical vehicles we could have owned at the time. Honestly, there are times I wish I still had one (they are that practical). You need to do what is best for your family at the moment and at least you will still have the truck!

Posted

Up until recently we all got by just fine without "automatic" doors and back up cameras and remote starts and heated seats and blah blah blah. :crazy:

We depend too much on technology for what we think are necessities. That being said though the others are right, make wife happy, otherwise she gives you no more sex and that = :sigh:

Posted
Up until recently we all got by just fine without "automatic" doors

 

These are not a new feature, been around for sometime now.

Posted

I have had nothing but crappy experiences with Toyotas, with the exception being the Seinnas. They're probably the only (new) vehicle made by them that I would buy. And as much as I never want a minivan, they are pretty darn practical when it comes to kids. I'm sure your wife will be happy with it, and you'll be happy with a truck and a Camaro. Win-win, IMO.

Posted
and you'll be happy with a truck and a Camaro. Win-win, IMO.

 

Yes Sir I think it is :ughdance:

Posted

But how do you get by the ugliness factor of the Sienna?

 

 

Fire up and drive this (6.2L Silverado) every day. Enough said.

DSC03716.JPG

DSC03716.JPG

DSC03716.JPG

DSC03716.JPG

Posted

Yes but you would have to park your tough looking ride next to that silly looking minivan with the funny taillights. Ah well, it could be worse I suppose.

Posted
Yes but you would have to park your tough looking ride next to that silly looking minivan with the funny taillights. Ah well, it could be worse I suppose.

 

You're acting like a damn child. It's not like he's replacing the truck with a van. It wouldn't be my choice but he's doing it for his wife and kids. Giving someone crap for being a responsible father is stupid.

Posted

I agree with Mike ^ You are doing what is best for your family. I traded in my Truck for a used Tahoe that has some problems but since the wife loves it and it's easier for the her with the kids especially with a third on the way, you have to do what is best. If I had to buy a minivan it would be a Sienna, so I hope you guys get what SHE wants and enjoy the Camaro when you get it!

Posted

Well we bought it. I hate the car buying process (3 hrs is to long). Went pretty smooth. Wife loves it. I was surprised that it had the backup camera standard. Features wise it is very nice and space wise it works for us.

Posted

Jesus haha I should abide by my rules eh? Here ya go oh and it is snowing today :(

 

(null)

mobileUpload.jpg

mobileUpload.jpg

mobileUpload.jpg

mobileUpload.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,791
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    d.lowrey
    Newest Member
    d.lowrey
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 4,540 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
    • Definitely needs to go back to the dealer. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...