Jump to content

Just curios


Recommended Posts

Posted

I was just curios to know why GM does not have their engine tuned at the factory to obtain their optimum performance. Would it not be in favor to do so. I always thought what performs best, sells best.

Posted

Probably has alot to do with the life expectancy of the engine and the drivetrain.

Posted

I know also with the diesle engines with those chips you can get better fuel econ and better power at the same time . I personaly think its gas companyies paying off the auto makers to make vehicals less effieceint .

Posted

I think its about dependabilty and somewhat the life of the motor life said above.But its like a shift kit they actually help the trans and do indeed extend the trans life since they like firm shifts,and have unbinded shifts.

Posted

Probably has alot to do with the life expectancy of the engine and the drivetrain.

 

 

This ^^^^^^

I know also with the diesle engines with those chips you can get better fuel econ and better power at the same time . I personaly think its gas companyies paying off the auto makers to make vehicals less effieceint .

 

 

Not this ^^^^^

 

 

Having torque management applied saves the drivetrain the way GM sees it.

Posted

Yeah, looks as if auto makers try to make it best of both worlds, performance with dependability , if you look into it more they do give you a choice of a 4.8, 5.3, and a 6.2. Your best bet on performance would seem to be the 6.2 while your less performance could be the 4.8 with the 5.3 about mid. All great reliable trucks from what I have seen and heard from members here. Oh, if you want a performance truck, order the new C-19 supercharged chevy :)

Posted

whats good performance for you isnt for someone else. they try to meet in the middle while also making the trucks dependable (less breakdowns in the warranty period = money saved).

Posted

I am not 100 percent how chips work . I know my dad has a f350 year 2000 diesiel . he put a chip on it with 3 modes . econ, tow and somthing eles . Its a manual truck . and he loves it he says he gets better fuel milage and more power . nonthing to do with torqe manegment since its a manual .

Posted

Probably has alot to do with the life expectancy of the engine and the drivetrain.

 

Not sure exactly what you mean, could you please elaborate.
Posted

EPA

 

This would be my guess too. Yes performance tuned engines would be great from the showroom floor but all vehicle manufacturers also have federal mandates to meet as well. Performance based tunes wouldn't be meeting emission & mpg requirements as easily I would think. At least you are still allowed to get tunes after you purchase a vehicle.

Posted

Probably has alot to do with the life expectancy of the engine and the drivetrain.

 

Not sure exactly what you mean, could you please elaborate.

 

 

think of a turbo. yeah you can increase the psi on the turbo to crank out more power, but now since the turbo is working harder all the time it decreases the life expectancy of the turbo. think running vs walking.

 

same goes for all the other parts on the vehicle. the harder you make them work the less likely they are to last. you can get around that by engineering better parts, but now your talking more money again. there's a reason the f-150 raptor is 45 grand when you can get a basic f-150 for 20k. and if these manufacturers are going to make any money they cant be having these trucks coming in for repair work all the time during the warranty period.

Posted

Probably has alot to do with the life expectancy of the engine and the drivetrain.

 

Not sure exactly what you mean, could you please elaborate.

 

 

think of a turbo. yeah you can increase the psi on the turbo to crank out more power, but now since the turbo is working harder all the time it decreases the life expectancy of the turbo. think running vs walking.

 

same goes for all the other parts on the vehicle. the harder you make them work the less likely they are to last. you can get around that by engineering better parts, but now your talking more money again. there's a reason the f-150 raptor is 45 grand when you can get a basic f-150 for 20k. and if these manufacturers are going to make any money they cant be having these trucks coming in for repair work all the time during the warranty period.

 

its why you desigh the part to go just after warranty like how the big 3 use to operate .
Posted

Probably has alot to do with the life expectancy of the engine and the drivetrain.

 

Not sure exactly what you mean, could you please elaborate.

 

 

think of a turbo. yeah you can increase the psi on the turbo to crank out more power, but now since the turbo is working harder all the time it decreases the life expectancy of the turbo. think running vs walking.

 

same goes for all the other parts on the vehicle. the harder you make them work the less likely they are to last. you can get around that by engineering better parts, but now your talking more money again. there's a reason the f-150 raptor is 45 grand when you can get a basic f-150 for 20k. and if these manufacturers are going to make any money they cant be having these trucks coming in for repair work all the time during the warranty period.

 

its why you desigh the part to go just after warranty like how the big 3 use to operate .

 

Are you saying that with a tune, that you are more likely to break engine parts.
Posted

Probably has alot to do with the life expectancy of the engine and the drivetrain.

 

Not sure exactly what you mean, could you please elaborate.

 

 

think of a turbo. yeah you can increase the psi on the turbo to crank out more power, but now since the turbo is working harder all the time it decreases the life expectancy of the turbo. think running vs walking.

 

same goes for all the other parts on the vehicle. the harder you make them work the less likely they are to last. you can get around that by engineering better parts, but now your talking more money again. there's a reason the f-150 raptor is 45 grand when you can get a basic f-150 for 20k. and if these manufacturers are going to make any money they cant be having these trucks coming in for repair work all the time during the warranty period.

 

its why you desigh the part to go just after warranty like how the big 3 use to operate .

 

Are you saying that with a tune, that you are more likely to break engine parts.

 

yes . A tune just basicaly pushes the engine harder .

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 381 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
    • Good evening. I was lucky enough to get passed down to me a 2007 GMC LBZ that was my great uncle's. While the underside and rockers are more or less gone I feel like with time I can restore it to working order since it only has 110,000 miles and he put nearly every option he could get without getting the new body style since he did not trust DEF. So far I have done everything I can think of but when I put the key into the ignition nothing happens. I put 2 brand new batteries in it. Cleaned the terminals. Check all the fuses and relays and they all pass with my multimeter. I know I'm missing something that I just cant think of. The only odd thing is the OBD2 port works which makes me think its not the mega fuse. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...