Jump to content

When is Regular gas Not Regular Gas


CKNSLS

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all!

 

I am currently living in Southern California where I bought my Silverado new (5.3. it's a 2011). In the owners manual it says to use 87 octane regular gas.

 

I am moving in a few days to Utah where regular gas is actually 85 Octane. The mid-grad is 87 octane (which obviously costs more-about 10 cents a gallon).

 

I realize I probably have some smog stuff on my motor not found on other trucks shipped to other states. I know California smog rules are tougher than Federal standards.

 

The question is can I use the 85 octane even though my owners manual says a minimum of 87 octane?

 

If anybody knows I would appreciate some feedback.

Thanks!

Posted

No... You have to use the minimum required in the manual... ie 87. The truck doesn't know your in Utah and that the regular there is 85. They don't build different motors or tune for each state. They state the minimum octane and you have to be smart enough not to go lower.

Posted

OK-no problem there. I am wondering though why 85 is refined as regular in Utah. It's the same octane level no mater what brand you fill up on. So I have never driven a car (in California) that stated lower than 87.

 

So if the motor is no different it must be the smog equipment. Because many cars are filing up with regular at gas stations in Utah. I do not know if I believe it's all owner ignorance.

Posted

Usually lower octane is sold in high elevations.

Posted

I went thru this. I have my tuck tuned. My uncle and I went on a business trip to salt lake then to north east Utah. I didn't realize it was 85 because I wasn't filling it up my uncle was with his company card. But I emailed Justin at blackbear. He said the 85 will do no harm at all. You have nothing to worry about. You will get poor mileage if u get high up there and feel the lack in power. If you are taking I-15 and I'm not sure how far your going into Utah but around beaver you will start to climb to about 7500 ft. You will fill it. But your so far above sea level the air pressure is less. Lower compression. My truck ran fine.

 

Sent from my DROID X2 using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2

Posted

If your truck calls for minimum of 87 octane, that's what you need to run. If not you will notice less performance, power and mpg's.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone4S

using Tapatalk

Posted

Areas of the country that are higher elevation get gas blends of lower octane. As you go higher in elevation the engine needs less octane. This has been true for years.

 

Mark

Posted

I don't think 2 octane points is going to make all that much difference either way.

 

The computer will retard timing if it knocks / pings, which it probably won't do anyway if your driving it where you bought the fuel. Your mileage will actually go up when your at high elevation, because the computer will cut back fuel to match the decrease in o2. You lose power at high elevations whether your driving these newer electronic wonders, or old school carbureted. The carbed one will lose power even more so, because it will be pig rich & inefficient.

Posted

I didn't read entire 1st post......the truck will adjust on it's own if you use that fuel. The elevation must be the reson for lower grade.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone4S

using Tapatalk

Posted

No... You have to use the minimum required in the manual... ie 87. The truck doesn't know your in Utah and that the regular there is 85. They don't build different motors or tune for each state. They state the minimum octane and you have to be smart enough not to go lower.

 

 

NOT correct, in Utah (and Idaho where I live), with the higher elevation (Boise 2730', Salt Lake City 4200') the air is thinner, which = less oxygen per volume in the cylinder. The corrrect (stoichiometric) air-fuel mixture will be met with lower octane fuel. Don't waste your money.

Posted

Areas of the country that are higher elevation get gas blends of lower octane. As you go higher in elevation the engine needs less octane. This has been true for years.

 

Mark

 

 

This...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My son got a hatchback withe the aero package for like 17k new. Great little car with amazing MPH
    • Yeah, I've given up years ago with that! I was able to load a few when I first joined the site sometime around '07. Then after maybe 20 pics, it said I exceeded the limit. Now every pic I try to post says I've "exceeded 1mb".   ONE MB??? That's Windows 95 ******, lol!! 
    • I get the same results with pictures. Then I figure it out. Then I forget. Screw it.
    • I guess I'm the only one on this forum who can't get effing pics to load here! Do you have to resize them to post, or am I just blocked from uploads?   I have the same luck with automotive electronics ... but this is the ONLY site on the net that I have this problem!   I'd post pics of what I'm working on ... but I CAN'T! 🤬       Just fabbed up the kickdown cable (had to extend the cable mount WAAAY out from the throttle shaft to get a full pull), and parts arrived for the fuel lines on the 940 carb conversion project. Should be able to drive this thing by the end of the day. If not for work, I'd have had this thing done SIX weeks ago.   Got the jetting sorted out last week. Had a real bad tip-in bog that I couldn't seem to correct. Friggin float height was over 11mm too HIGH! eBay purchase, so no wonder everything is screwed up right out of the box! I ended up with a larger dual-squirt accelerator pump jet anyway instead of the single. Also moved the 70 primary idle jet (4 sizes too big out of the box) to the secondary idle circuit, and installed a 57 in the primary. Runs great on the fuel bottle!    Still using the computer for ignition. Going to drive it first and see if I want to go through the project of installing an intermediate shaft with a distributor drive gear, so I can install a block-mounted distributor and run points, 100% computer free. I should do that anyway just from a simplicity / reliability / tunability standpoint. The electronics left me stranded last year a couple times! I can't tweak the timing to my liking right now because of the computer. Tried twisting the cam-driven distributor already ... and the damned thing just reverts back to where it was! That's infuriating. But if it runs well enough I might save that for next season.   Just driving it in and out of the shop to work on other projects, it feels 1,000% more responsive with the carburetor. Also fires MUCH faster when cranking. Can't wait to drive it and see if I got more than 114 ponies, lolol.   Hopefully these don't go 404 like the last post ... https://postimg.cc/gallery/MjhrmZS   Seems like that site went back to dial-up internet! Maybe they'll fix that some day ...
    • Triumph makes me think of cars not bikes. Especially with model names like the TR7, that was a Triumph car model too. Peak TR for me was the TR250. You could retain the post-war roadster looks, with an optional surrey hard top, but with an inline 6 engine instead of the TR4's anemic 4-cylinder, but still have a 4 speed, optional overdrive.   I know almost nothing about Triumph bikes, except that they exist. Good looking bikes though.   I don't know if I could just have one vehicle. The Silverado does it all except for fitting anywhere. But it leaves a void in real driving enjoyment, unless driving an extremely large sofa is your thing.   What did I do to my 'other' (muslce car - which one!?) vehicle lately. I took my '23 SS for a drive. It's only got 1600 miles. I keep reminding myself I shouldn't be so precious about this car. It likes to be driven. Needs to be driven. Life is short and if I don't enjoy it, someone else will. The other half calls it "the garage ornament".
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...