Jump to content

New updated GM picture


Recommended Posts

Posted

Saw this today on GMInsidenews.

 

Some interesting observations. Doors are not flush with windshield and don't wrap onto the roof. XM/Onstar antenna, door handles look unchanged. Looks to have bed rail protectors. This appears to be the 6 1/2 ft bed option with the crew we've been looking for. Also, what's up with the "splashguard" in front of the rear wheel? The front air dam looks REALLY low. For the GMT 900 guys who've removed their air dam, I wonder if this one will be easily removed and look right?

 

 

NG-Silverado-20_2%25255B3%25255D.jpg

 

NG-Silverado-20_3%25255B3%25255D.jpg

 

NG-Silverado-20_1%25255B3%25255D.jpg

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

These new trucks look like a revised gmt-900. Its like the change GM did in '03, front end and tail lights. Very disappointing., but at least they will have new motors.

Posted

These new trucks look like a revised gmt-900. Its like the change GM did in '03, front end and tail lights. Very disappointing., but at least they will have new motors.

 

 

New motors, interiors & revised headlight/grill. While they are making many changes, they kind of set the expectation that it was going to be all new. Which to me means that it does not resemble the current model.

 

Will have to wait until the official release, but they better have one hell of a motor under the hood if the above is the extent of all new.

Posted

I love what I see so far. I think the headlights are going to look like the GMT400 style split top and bottom, it almost looks like they are hidding the bottom row, the grill looks promising and tough in your face look, i like the rear tail light shape and design along with the "spolier" intergrated into the bed sides and tail gate.

Posted

I guess its like the Super duty, its been an all new truck 2 or 3 times with the same basic design since 1998, but people still buy it when they do subtle changes. I do like what i see but I was expecting a whole new design not a revised design. The rear tail light looks like they took the gmt-900 and made the back-up light smaller and made it 3 dimensional, like they did in '03.

Posted

I'm worried :(

 

 

Me too. The front looks way too low, and the fender openings are even more squared off than the current model....two things I really hoped they would fix on the new generation. :sigh:

Posted

Time will tell. I bet the front end is gorgeous. The rest scares me. I'm not going to jump the gun and "jump ship" yet until I can see one in person.

 

Sent from the Blackberry Bold 9900 using Tapatalk

Posted

My thoughts:

 

- the truck on GMT seems to be an LS or WT model...note the standard headlights. The LTZ on the AutoBlog site appears to have projector headlights, although not HID which I really hope makes the option list (it better, Ford now has em').

 

- why did the sliding back glass get so much smaller compared to the 900s? Must have option in my book.

 

- I hope that styled lower bumper valance pops off as easy as the 900.

 

- My lift guy is going to have a field day with his sawzall and those fenders. I can't believe how tight they are (especially the front) running a standard tread probably 265-size tire. Its sickening how much this simple design item affects how you toy and modify your truck. I pray the end result (or maybe the GMC) will be different.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • While waiting for parts I have been working on installing the AC compressor, new accumulator, and orifice tube. Also changed out the high side ball valve (original). The orifice tube that was in there wasn't too bad. Slightly dirty, a little bit of junk, but not blocked. Glad I changed it out.   The accumulator, which should have been a 5 minute job, may have just burned $50. Put some PAG in it, wrote the date and mileage on the side, fresh o-rings and gooey'd up the threads and rings with Nylog. Got everything connected and snugged and was going to vacuum down the system, and....   My manifold gauge won't fit on the port. It's not an R12 service port. It LOOKS like an R134 service port but the diameter is a hair too large. There's a sticker on the accumulator that says it's designed to be used with R12 and R134a systems only. So it's not R1234yf. Even if I reduced the diameter slightly with a file, the shoulder on the port is too large so the quick-connect valve won't lock on. I'm stumped. It's going back, and 50/50 on if they'll give me a refund.   Also, I did a fuel pressure test.... Key on, the gauge spikes to about 60psi and quickly bleeds off, like 2psi per second. The fuel isn't going into the plenum, no smell, starts fine, so I'm guessing there's a bad check valve in the pump and the fuel is just draining back into the tank. oh, hell. But, it shouldn't be a problem, pump primes just fine and the truck starts right up. It just means I can't really ever use fuel pressure to verify a leak at the injector or intake.
    • Got this yesterday out of nowhere. Truck is a 25',6.6 gasser with 8k miles.  Only semi anomaly is that the truck had been sitting, uncranked for 6 days. Elec Stability Control showed immediately upon cranking, not while driving. No drivability issues, just the message. Battery didn't seem to be weak when cranking over.  I drove it, killed it, let it sit a few hrs with no avail.  Truck is 100% stock. No damage. 
    • This can be done.  It is not cheap and requires an instrument cluster swap with custom programming, new steering wheel with the controls on it, and a special jumper harness.   The cluster upgrade - 12.3” Digital Cluster Upgrade – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The wheel upgrade - Steering Wheel Upgrade Kit – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The column harness upgrade - 2019 - 2026 Silverado / Sierra: Steering Wheel LIN Bus Harness - Harness Dr. - DIY Done Right     The problem with doing all of this?  You pretty much can't have any programming done to your truck that involves the cluster ever again.  The dealer won't be able to program the cluster as GM's system will only pull data for the cluster the truck came with.  So it would be advised also to turn off over the air updates.   TLDR;  Should have bought an LT double cab?  You'd have a power seat, the wheel controls, the cluster, all things that you've been seeking in your various posts so far about your new WT regular cab.  
    • I was unaware of that, thanks for updating me.
    • Yes.  The 2.7 Turbomax has Active Fuel Management.  It is NOT the same as the V8s.  Totally different system.     Here is an article from GM when the 2.7 came out explaining the cylinder deactivation and the valve lift system.  Starts at the section called "SCS Valvetrain":   New Turbocharged 2.7L 4-Cylinder Engine Powers Full-Size Trucks – TechLink         This is an internet myth going around.  It was alleged that some 5.3s had this mystical 8th digit of the VIN as an "E" which somehow meant it had a new one year only 5.3 that didn't have DFM.  The writer of said article and the person that made the claim conveniently can't count because they posted the VIN.  The 8th digit was a "D" which meant its still the 5.3 with DFM.  The 9th digit of the VIN was an "E" and the 9th digit isn't the engine code.  At all.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...