Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Unfortunately my fuel economy has dropped since I bought the truck new last summer. At 40,000 miles and I see about 15.5 mpg as my tank to tank average.

 

Was getting 18 mpg average when new.

Edited by mrbadwrench
Posted (edited)

I took this pic today while my wife and I were out running around. I thought this was going to be the high water mark. Turns out I was wrong. I got up to 25.6 at one point. Very happy with that.

 

Here is my first pic of a 50 mile running average.

 

20151025_1621521_zpsby27pzeh.jpg20151024_1309501_zpshrblm29e.jpeg

 

This is the only picture I have at the moment. It's one my wife took while I sat in the truck and learned about some of the features of the truck in an empty parking lot.

Edited by Eddie 70
  • Like 1
Posted

I still have the original W.O.L. Good Year Wrangler SR-A M+S P265/65R18 on there.

 

I know most don't like them, but they have been very good tires except for a little lacking in deep snow. Stay balanced, no vibrations, and with 25,000 on them, have a lot of life still in them. I've had one puncture that must have been a sharp rock, but has been doing well after the repair.

 

I also have a double-cab 5.3, 6sp, w/3.42 gear ratio.

 

What tires do you have, and your truck stats? You must travel some long slopes out West?

 

 

I have the LT265/70R17C All-terrain blackwall tires. My truck is 4x4 dbl cab 4.3 w 3.42. I drive a lot of dirt roads so need the AT tires and like having 17s for the ride. I think with the 255/70 17 street tires I could get another 2mpg easy. I guess I am pretty old school and don't like the look of the 20s or 22s, not to mention the ride.

 

I wish we had some more flat roads around here as I am getting about 28mpg going 65 on the flat. It jumps over 30 going 55. But out west here the speed limits are pretty high. We have 80 mph on a lot of Interstate. Right in town it is 70 mph on I-15. Our back roads are all 65 outside of towns.

 

We do have some good down hills so the 25 and 50 don't mean too much, but it is still fun to see what these trucks can do. I have a new 50 record that I will post up.

 

A big thing I found is that the cruse controls works really well. I have a hard time beating it. It seems to keep the motor in V4 more than I can. I will get up to speed manually and I turn off the cruse on the big down hills to let the truck pick up speed for the next up hill. And some times I will bump the speed down a few mph on uphills and then get back to the speed limit on the down hill. I even use the cruse in town.

Posted

Unfortunately my fuel economy has dropped since I bought the truck new last summer. At 40,000 miles and I see about 15.5 mpg as my tank to tank average.

 

Was getting 18 mpg average when new.

 

Is it just getting cooler out there? You will see a 20% drop off or more as it cools down. More if you are doing short trips where the motor has to warm up every time.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

Is it just getting cooler out there? You will see a 20% drop off or more as it cools down. More if you are doing short trips where the motor has to warm up every time.

No, I am aware of seasonal variations. The mileage has been declining slowly since last summer. It was lower last winter but didn't really bounce back this summer.

 

My suspicion is I have a carbon build up problem, as nothing else on the truck has changed.

Posted

Last 13 months. Includes a 5+ month Michigan winter and winter blend gas.

post-130182-0-63176300-1445877795_thumb.jpeg

post-130182-0-63176300-1445877795_thumb.jpeg

post-130182-0-63176300-1445877795_thumb.jpeg

post-130182-0-63176300-1445877795_thumb.jpeg

Posted

That is very good mpg's Ventilator! I have the same truck as you and after 13 months (8100 miles) I am at 19.17 mpg's hand calculated. My DIC is always 1.0 to 1.3 mpgs higher than hand calculated but my lifetime (never have reset the trip B) has me at 19.5 so it seems the longer it has time to average mpgs the closer it is to the truth. I am not overly impressed with the mpg's I am getting considering my 2002 model with more front ground clearance and heavy LT AT tires and 4.10 gears averaged around 18 mpg.

Posted

Yup killed the 100,000 mile extended warranty in 20 months

I have a 2014 SLT ll Terrain .... 79,978 as of today. Warranty was gone in less than 10 months.

Posted

Got outta town for Halloween (Too many tick or treaters in my hood (hundreds)) took a road trip to our local mountains about 70mi each way. Uphill all the way out, down all the way back. Ave 15.5 on the way out and to my utter amazement hit 27.7 on the way back and have maintained over 25mpg so far.

 

This is with a 6.2 8 speed. Super impressed with this truck so far. My 6 speed manual LS1 camaro could not get that kinda mileage. My wifes 14' equinox (3.6) can't get that mileage.Only thing I know that will do that has 4 cylinders. The only thing about these trucks is they don't seem to start getting good mileage until they run for a bit like after 20+ minutes (like a timer in the computer) and they don't like loads, or hills when it comes to MPG.

post-23992-0-27816000-1446439807.jpg

post-23992-0-27816000-1446439807.jpg

post-23992-0-27816000-1446439807.jpg

post-23992-0-27816000-1446439807.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Agreed with all that you said. They also suck a lot of gas when first started up and at idle then other vehicles I have had IMO.

Posted

My first 1000 mile average. I am pretty happy with this. It may go down from here but this is a good start for a new to me 2 year old truck with 43k miles.

 

20151105_192838%202_zpssyeoftfw.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

You must be out in West TN to get that kind of gas mileage, too many hills on my side of the state to get that.

  • Like 1
Posted

You must be out in West TN to get that kind of gas mileage, too many hills on my side of the state to get that.

 

No sir! I live just about 5 minutes south of the I40-I75 split.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,858 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...