Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm looking into getting a 2.5 rc level and 275/65/20s for my 2014 silverado 4x2. Has anyone done this? I know the 2wd's sit about a half inch lower than the 4wd's so im a little worried about having enough clearance for the tires. My truck measures 38" from the ground to the wheel well in back and 35.5" in front.

Posted (edited)

Ok guys I'm about to pull the trigger here shortly I need some help. I'm going to run the icon vehicle dynamic stage 2 suspension it states 5" back spacing max so I figured run the fuel maverick +1 offset that has a 5" back space. I want to run the nitro Terra grapplers I really don't want to go crazy on the size would rather not have to cut or modify anything. What size tires do you guys think? 275/60/r20, 285/55/r20 or something different?

 

I really like the look of this truck.

Edited by never_rested_24-7
Posted

I read an earlier post that someone had installed 275/60/20 tires on stock wheels of a 2014 Silverado or Sierra 4x4 without a leveling kit and they did not rub. My brother has a 2014 High Country 4x4 w 275/60/20 Michelin AT's on stock ride height and they don't rub either. I'm sure this would be the largest tire size one could install w/o some sort of lift. Anyway, the stock 4x4 trucks are already 1" higher in the front compared to a stock 4x2 truck. Must be that added 1" of ride height that allows this size tire to run w/o any rubbing.

 

I just bought a new 2014 High Country 4x4 short box and considering 275/60/20 when the stock tire wear. In lieu of a leveling kit, what other options are there? Someone had mentioned Bilstein 5100 adjustable shocks. Are these available yet for the 2014's? If not, are there other adjustable shocks available for this purpose?

 

Thanks...

Posted

Also, I talked to a technical sales guy named Brian over at Bilstein today at their NC facility about availability of the height adjustable 5100 shocks for the GM 1500 pick up trucks. He said that they should release by mid to late October 2014. He expressed that they were just doing some final product tuning before release to the market.

 

He said that a press release would come first to Facebook and the Mass Media. I'm looking forward to getting a set.

Posted

Hmm I have read every page in this thread but just looked at the pic I shot this morning at the dealership and mine looks almost level........HMMM

 

truck-vi.jpg

 

It looks like they did some custom work on the grille. Maybe they did a 2" front level as well... :cheers:

Posted (edited)

Hmm I have read every page in this thread but just looked at the pic I shot this morning at the dealership and mine looks almost level........HMMM

 

truck-vi.jpg

Looks like a Rally Edition. Wheels and stripes, painted grille surround. Do they level those via front lift or rear drop?

 

**triple-tap**

Edited by Texas Husker
Posted

That's a Factory setup with the Rally II Package......brand new 3 miles. It didn't come home with me as the title hasn't made it to the dealer yet. It's the first one they have ever received. In fact all the press releases on the new Rally II package say it doesn't come out till tomorrow :)

 

That's what I was thinking two minutes too late... Great looking setup though. and the gap between the wheels and fenders look it is not leveled. Could be the angle though. Do the Rally's come with any leveling modification?

Posted

 

That's what I was thinking two minutes too late... Great looking setup though. and the gap between the wheels and fenders look it is not leveled. Could be the angle though. Do the Rally's come with any leveling modification?

This is the GM stock photo of the Rally Edition. If you look at the fender gaps front and rear, it doesn't look leveled, but the white Rally Edition pictured above definitely looks like it has a front level... ????

 

Chevrolet-Silverado-Rally-Edition1.jpg

 

truck-vi.jpg

Posted

Here's my 2014 All Terrain.

 

2.5 Rough Country Level

 

305 Nitto Trail Grappler

 

Camlocker toolbox

 

Rigid Duallys in the fog lights with the Rigid mounts.

 

15% tint all around

 

adegubuh.jpg

 

e5ynegeq.jpg

Rigid had mounts for LED fogs for the GMC's? I hadn't seen those? Do you have a link by any chance?

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2

Posted

Hmm I have read every page in this thread but just looked at the pic I shot this morning at the dealership and mine looks almost level........HMMM

 

truck-vi.jpg

 

The rake doesn't look as extreme as others but definitely does not look level to me.

Posted

I agree after looking at it more closely. I'll have to measure it when I pick it up.

 

I'm thinking from the looks of the picture its about half of what the regular stock ones are

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,875 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...