Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

All you need tolevel the K2s is a 2"-2.5" spacer in the front. I have a 2" skyjacker level kit, dealer installed. It sits perfect. I even had 2 other dealers tell me that a 2-2.5" spacer in the front levels the truck. Leaving the rear stock. If you change out the rear with a 2" block then you, atleast when we talk mathematically, get some rake. If you need 2.5" to level front with stock rear, then adding 1" to stock rear would require you to put a 3.5" spacer in the front to level.

 

 

 

Agree on that. Was just trying to figure out his setup. But it seems 2-2.5 in front is what is required. YMMV of course.

 

 

Ya the reason I was confused was because every single leveling kit (not lift) I've seen for the K2xx has been either an upper or lower strut spacer. If I do anything lift wise on my truck it will probably just level on the front, andas Texas said, replacing the rear blocks to 2" so it takes some rake out while still having a rake while also lifting the whole truck a little since the front ends are lower than they should be, especially for a 4x4.

Posted

I've read this entire thread and saw the question was asked but never answered; anyone know if 295/70/18 will fit with a rc 2" level and stock wheels? Thanks in advance.

well I guess im gonna find out if it is gonna fit ordered the tires from discount. I am expecting some rub but honestley I will trim what I have to when I have to. I will update next week when they do the test fit, and I cant wait.

Posted

 

was it 2.5 up front and replace the rear block with a 2" block? Therefore 2.5 upfront and 1" in rear?

Yes, it is. I completely messed up and switched the numbers from the front to the back.

Posted

Rough country sells a level kit that is just 2" to the front, that will make it level for you. I just bought one, I didn't want more height to the back.

Posted

I know a lot are using the rough country spacer. But, I've also heard that the bolt on each side that is under the axle shafts hit the shaft. So that's why I'm probably leaning towards an upper strut spacer if I do level it. Plus the lower strut mounts that I've seen aren't metal and I don't really like that.

Posted (edited)

hi i finnally bit the bullet ,2in level 33x12.5x20 federal tires no rubbing mounted on my factory 20 in all terrain rims! , aggressive tire has some road noise will post picks soon looks great

Edited by cbprov
Posted (edited)

I know a lot are using the rough country spacer. But, I've also heard that the bolt on each side that is under the axle shafts hit the shaft. So that's why I'm probably leaning towards an upper strut spacer if I do level it. Plus the lower strut mounts that I've seen aren't metal and I don't really like that.

The lower strut spacer not being metal is no problem they have been doing that for years. You probably don't want the spacer to be metal if you have aluminum control arms anyways. It is more difficult to install a spacer on top of the strut then the bottom. As for the bolts hitting the CV shaft, no problem, just do like I did below.

 

"I had the same issue, one of the bolts would hit the CV shaft if I installed it with the head of the bolt on the bottom per the instructions from Rough Country.

With the upper ball joint and steering linkage ball joint disconnected I was able to tilt the hub assembly enough to get the CV shaft out of the way and then put the bolts in with the head on the top side and nuts on the bottom. Here are some pics.

post-127588-0-90132700-1411523409_thumb.jpg

post-127588-0-13864000-1411523419_thumb.jpg

post-127588-0-05701400-1411523429_thumb.jpg

post-127588-0-90132700-1411523409_thumb.jpg

post-127588-0-13864000-1411523419_thumb.jpg

post-127588-0-05701400-1411523429_thumb.jpg

post-127588-0-90132700-1411523409_thumb.jpg

post-127588-0-13864000-1411523419_thumb.jpg

post-127588-0-05701400-1411523429_thumb.jpg

post-127588-0-90132700-1411523409_thumb.jpg

post-127588-0-13864000-1411523419_thumb.jpg

post-127588-0-05701400-1411523429_thumb.jpg

Edited by 15LTZZ71
  • Like 1
Posted

 

The lower strut spacer not being metal is no problem they have been doing that for years. You probably don't want the spacer to be metal if you have aluminum control arms anyways. It is more difficult to install a spacer on top of the strut then the bottom. As for the bolts hitting the CV shaft, no problem, just do like I did below.

 

"I had the same issue, one of the bolts would hit the CV shaft if I installed it with the head of the bolt on the bottom per the instructions from Rough Country.

With the upper ball joint and steering linkage ball joint disconnected I was able to tilt the hub assembly enough to get the CV shaft out of the way and then put the bolts in with the head on the top side and nuts on the bottom. Here are some pics.

 

 

 

My A-arms are steel.

 

As for the bolt I don't know why I didn't think of that lol. All of the vids of seen with the RC spacer they do it like the directions say with the nut on top. I saw someone even went as far as to cut that bolt on each side shorter. Not sure if it matters rather the bolt head is on the top or bottom though, but I don't see a problem.

 

As for the material, I'm sure it's fine. I know it isn't simple plastic. I guess I would feel safer with a metal spacer.

 

I know the upper spacers are harder to install and would need a strut compressor, but as I stated I guess I would feel safer with a metal spacer.

 

P.S - I like your avatar lol

Posted

Planning a 2.5" spacer up front on my CC/LT/Std box w/18s. What's the largest size I can go without rubbing, on stock wheels? 285/65/18?

Posted

 

 

My A-arms are steel.

 

As for the bolt I don't know why I didn't think of that lol. All of the vids of seen with the RC spacer they do it like the directions say with the nut on top. I saw someone even went as far as to cut that bolt on each side shorter. Not sure if it matters rather the bolt head is on the top or bottom though, but I don't see a problem.

 

As for the material, I'm sure it's fine. I know it isn't simple plastic. I guess I would feel safer with a metal spacer.

 

I know the upper spacers are harder to install and would need a strut compressor, but as I stated I guess I would feel safer with a metal spacer.

 

P.S - I like your avatar lol

I've noticed a lot of people complaining about rough country plastic spacers which in reality is not plastic but a fiberglass reinforced nylon which is really strong and can handle more pressure per square inch than most metals. Everyone thinks that since its metal its stronger when in reality could be a lot weaker. I have seen so many aluminum kits snap in half do to poor aluminum quality as well as it being a cast piece opposed to a forged piece. For those who don't know the differences a cast piece has molten aluminum poured into a mould to create the piece. A forged piece is a block of molten aluminum that has been compressed and let dry to a solid block then placed into a CNC machine and then the design is cut out. The problem with cast is that when its poured into an mould and let dry small air pockets are formed inside most not visible to the naked eye which create weak spots where the part can easily snap as I have seen happen to a lot of these cheap ebay kits. A forged piece is stronger as it reduces significantly the air pockets in the piece. If you weigh a cast and forged piece same design the forged piece will always weigh more as it has been compressed. Don't buy the cheap aluminum ebay kits, buy from a reputable company as they have done the research and testing. To those who still question the fiberglass reinforced nylon block strength I used to own an f150 with a 3" body lift with reinforced nylon blocks. The truck was in an accident on the highway and rolled over. The truck was totaled cab crushed in frame bent like crazy and twisted as well. The floor of cab ripped apart at spot welds. The blocks were intact, never bent, cracked or snapped a bolt. After seeing this I never question the strength of these reinforced nylon blocks as I know they will not fail. I have not heard of anyone saying these nylon blocks cracking or breaking, just negative remarks from those who don't know what they are talking about.

  • Like 4
Posted

I've noticed a lot of people complaining about rough country plastic spacers which in reality is not plastic but a fiberglass reinforced nylon which is really strong and can handle more pressure per square inch than most metals. Everyone thinks that since its metal its stronger when in reality could be a lot weaker. I have seen so many aluminum kits snap in half do to poor aluminum quality as well as it being a cast piece opposed to a forged piece. For those who don't know the differences a cast piece has molten aluminum poured into a mould to create the piece. A forged piece is a block of molten aluminum that has been compressed and let dry to a solid block then placed into a CNC machine and then the design is cut out. The problem with cast is that when its poured into an mould and let dry small air pockets are formed inside most not visible to the naked eye which create weak spots where the part can easily snap as I have seen happen to a lot of these cheap ebay kits. A forged piece is stronger as it reduces significantly the air pockets in the piece. If you weigh a cast and forged piece same design the forged piece will always weigh more as it has been compressed. Don't buy the cheap aluminum ebay kits, buy from a reputable company as they have done the research and testing. To those who still question the fiberglass reinforced nylon block strength I used to own an f150 with a 3" body lift with reinforced nylon blocks. The truck was in an accident on the highway and rolled over. The truck was totaled cab crushed in frame bent like crazy and twisted as well. The floor of cab ripped apart at spot welds. The blocks were intact, never bent, cracked or snapped a bolt. After seeing this I never question the strength of these reinforced nylon blocks as I know they will not fail. I have not heard of anyone saying these nylon blocks cracking or breaking, just negative remarks from those who don't know what they are talking about.

 

Thanks for the info. As I stated I knew it was something more than just plastic. Also I would only buy from known companies.

  • Like 3
Posted

well I guess im gonna find out if it is gonna fit ordered the tires from discount. I am expecting some rub but honestley I will trim what I have to when I have to. I will update next week when they do the test fit, and I cant wait.

 

I am interested in this as well. I ran that size tire on my 2.5" leveled 2013 F150 and had no issues, but I can't seem to get an answer on any forum about that size on the 2014 Silverado/Sierra.

 

I hope that it works out for you, because if it does I will be ordering that exact same size very soon. Good Luck.

Posted

Works perfectly and I'm so damn excited. A very slight rub on the carpeted fender well at full lock. Nothing I'm worried about as far as trimming at all. 295 70 r18 on a 2014 sierra with a 2.5 rough country lift. Trail grapplers great tires and smooth ride for being mud tires.it won't let me upload my pictures. But as soon as I can I will. But I have never been happier that a huge tire fit this good without a major lift. Has milage took a hit but worth it in my opinion lol!

I am interested in this as well. I ran that size tire on my 2.5" leveled 2013 F150 and had no issues, but I can't seem to get an answer on any forum about that size on the 2014 Silverado/Sierra.

 

I hope that it works out for you, because if it does I will be ordering that exact same size very soon. Good Luck.

  • Like 1
Posted

Works perfectly and I'm so damn excited. A very slight rub on the carpeted fender well at full lock. Nothing I'm worried about as far as trimming at all. 295 70 r18 on a 2014 sierra with a 2.5 rough country lift. Trail grapplers great tires and smooth ride for being mud tires.it won't let me upload my pictures. But as soon as I can I will. But I have never been happier that a huge tire fit this good without a major lift. Has milage took a hit but worth it in my opinion lol!

 

Great to hear. One of my top sizes on my list. We need pics though!!! Can you email them?

Posted

Great to hear. One of my top sizes on my list. We need pics though!!! Can you email them?

Heck yeah if you will post them on here. All I have are a few snaps at a gas station. Send me a pm with info and I'll send you pics to post.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 463 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...