Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Rough country 2" leveling kit, 1" taller blocks in rear, 265/60/20r falken rocky Mountain tires, gm mud flaps, hids high and low beam, Truxedo lo Pro qt tonneau cover, magnaflow dual exhaust, range v8

post-123945-0-75598600-1381960632_thumb.jpg

post-123945-0-75598600-1381960632_thumb.jpg

post-123945-0-75598600-1381960632_thumb.jpg

post-123945-0-75598600-1381960632_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

Picked up mine today after waiting 2 days for the dealer to tint the windows, spray in a bedliner, clear bra the front end, and install the Katzkin leather seats. I'm pretty impressed with how quiet this truck is - similar to my wife's BMW 7 series. Visibility is pretty good, switchgear is pretty ergonomic, and the steering feels tight without any wandering or poor on-center feel. Did find 2 flaws - a rusted trim fastener, and pitting of the chrome on the edge of the front bumper

 

Pros- nice ride, quiet, good steering, impressive interior, voice control works well, fuel economy is way better than my 01 6.0 without much trade-off of power, 6 speaker non-Bose is actually decent in sound quality (helps that the interior has little background noise), rear corner steps and hand holds work very well, love having a overhead grab handle on the driver's side

 

Cons- key fobs feel like Cracker Jack toys (SLE) - the SLT key fobs feel more substantial, hard to reach seat controls due to limited space

 

pics:

 

fresh wash and nano wax

34_zps3fccf4de.jpg

front_zpse880b2a0.jpg

 

Katzkin leather seats

interior2_zps5953e6a1.jpg

interior_zps47bb8bf1.jpg

interior3_zps560ccd65.jpg

 

corroded fastener vs good fastener

rust_zpsbe9bb9e9.jpg

norust_zps237b6aaf.jpg

 

pitting in the chrome front bumper

pitting_zps7a31f895.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted

I have been shopping trucks for months and it came down to the Tundra or GMC. The GMC with it's many unique options, great looks, and value won out for me. Located this one a few hours from me and pulled the trigger last night. SLT DC 4X4 Z71, loving it so far! Many thanks to members on this forum for the information, reviews, and pictures posted that helped me decide.

post-124619-0-25359100-1382203761_thumb.jpg

post-124619-0-18403700-1382203804_thumb.jpg

post-124619-0-40154900-1382203829_thumb.jpg

post-124619-0-25359100-1382203761_thumb.jpg

post-124619-0-18403700-1382203804_thumb.jpg

post-124619-0-40154900-1382203829_thumb.jpg

post-124619-0-25359100-1382203761_thumb.jpg

post-124619-0-18403700-1382203804_thumb.jpg

post-124619-0-40154900-1382203829_thumb.jpg

post-124619-0-25359100-1382203761_thumb.jpg

post-124619-0-18403700-1382203804_thumb.jpg

post-124619-0-40154900-1382203829_thumb.jpg

  • Like 7
Posted (edited)

my new addition, tradded in my 2007 NBS with 6l for this. i LOVE this truck.

 

it has running boards, the bow tie fiberglass mud flaps, gm hard tanneu and spray in box liner.

 

IMG_00000677_zps56342dbd.jpg

 

my first mod since i got it

 

IMG_00000680_zps9462c539.jpg

 

IMG_00000679_zpsb1c43957.jpg

Edited by rocnrol
  • Like 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 3,190 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...