Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys, quick question for the electrical gurus

 

I'm planning to overhaul a few things starting in December, but first comes the bumpers and light bars. I plan to get rid of my current light bars and replace them with 2 curved 30" 4D optic bars that will run 300W EACH, so total of 600W. I currently have a wireless harness that is rated for 500W

 

Here's my question:

 

Is there anyway I can upgrade the relay and the blade fuse to allow me to get the harness to handle 600W? I really want to keep the harness since its wireless and I love being able to turn the bars on and off from outside the truck and not deal with another switch in the cab

Can I upgrade the current harness or do I have to get a second harness and just wire the trigger feeds together?

I personally think that upgrading from a 40W relay to say a 60W would be more than sufficient, but wanted to see what you guys say

Just want to get some opinions!

I also plan to get 4 extra light pods that will go in the bumper and angle slightly outward and be on their own harness

Posted

Mike,

 

You will want to add a second harness for the other light bar, but it is easily controlled by the remote harness. Just need to trigger the relay on the second harness with the output of the remote harness.

 

Some quick electrical math:

 

Power (Watts) = Voltage * Amperage

 

So that 500 watt harness at a "nominal" 12 volts DC is just over 40 amps. To get up to 600 watts, you're looking at about 50 amps. That's a big increase, and I doubt that the relay or harness could handle it for very long. Better to run an additional simple harness that is triggered by the first harness.

 

On electrical systems, amperage is the current flow... think of it like water trickling down a stream for low amps, or a raging river for high amps. Inside the wire, the electrons are doing the same thing, only when they bounce around they cause fiction, which heats the wire up and increases the resistance of the wire, which cuts down on the amount of power you can get out of it.

 

Let me know if you need me to draw a diagram that shows how to make it work.

Posted (edited)

I had traded the SLT for a Denali and get to start all over with projects. Already did reverse light LED PODS. I went to dual 8 inch pods (12 LED per pod) set up. Much better then 3 inch ones I had before.

 

So my question is..... has anyone successfully installed dual 32 in curved bars behind grill? In went back till in started seeing post I remembered from before.

 

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Edited by Toddfather
Posted

I had traded the SLT for a Denali and get to start all over with projects. Already did reverse light LED PODS. I went to dual 8 inch pods (12 LED per pod) set up. Much better then 3 inch ones I had before.

 

So my question is..... has anyone successfully installed dual 32 in curved bars behind grill? In went back till in started seeing post I remembered from before.

 

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

 

Are you asking about installing a DUAL ROW curved 32" or dual as in 2 light bars?

Posted

 

Are you asking about installing a DUAL ROW curved 32" or dual as in 2 light bars?

No I did that on old truck. I am talking adding 2 dual row 32 in bars. d0fb5200ab33dfcef97b2aa0de91856e.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Posted

No I did that on old truck. I am talking adding 2 dual row 32 in bars. d0fb5200ab33dfcef97b2aa0de91856e.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

 

I scanned just about every thread and forum and anything else I could find when doing research for my install, but I can't say I've ever seen someone install 2x dual row light bars behind the grill. Not saying it can't be done, but I personally haven't seen it. I did see on another forum of a NNBS silverado with 2x single row light bars behind the grill. Might be able to find a pic if your interested, but that probably doesn't help.

Posted

I like the challenge. It will fit with some light being lost behind emblems and lower grill. But if I aim them right it will be ok. Also plan on shim one leg on each bar help widen beam out.

 

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

I like the challenge. It will fit with some light being lost behind emblems and lower grill. But if I aim them right it will be ok. Also plan on shim one leg on each bar help widen beam out.

 

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Well since you have the Denali grill you've for more space to work with in placement of your lights. That grill has the same pattern all around vs SLE/SLT and A/T grill you have to work with the spacing of the grill to fit between slats. You'd have to put both down low. Definitely wouldn't fit up top with the grill mount tabs. Even still on the bottom it would be really tight, but looks doable. Maybe consider one double row and one single row?

 

51d2dcc9ac8c001b664cfa4fe5d5ce28.jpg

 

My AT grill compared to Denali grill

0d061e6e9873d66e79d400c13b4d04dc.jpg

51bb27fe516661f6eef0f46c0fa13cdd.jpg

Edited by Kerrslight
  • Like 2
Posted

Well since you have the Denali grill you've for more space to work with in placement of your lights. That grill has the same pattern all around vs SLE/SLT and A/T grill you have to work with the spacing of the grill to fit between slats. You'd have to put both down low. Definitely wouldn't fit up top with the grill mount tabs. Even still on the bottom it would be really tight, but looks doable. Maybe consider one double row and one single row?

 

51d2dcc9ac8c001b664cfa4fe5d5ce28.jpg

 

My AT grill compared to Denali grill

0d061e6e9873d66e79d400c13b4d04dc.jpg

51bb27fe516661f6eef0f46c0fa13cdd.jpg

9fb0bf592d38d8515b9ca35b7ba72bff.jpg

 

Pardon my crappy copy paste. But that's my idea

 

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Posted

9fb0bf592d38d8515b9ca35b7ba72bff.jpg

 

Pardon my crappy copy paste. But that's my idea

 

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

 

Well measure how much spacing you have from just under the GMC emblem to the bottom of the grill. You should have an extra inch, inch and a half on the inside of the grill than what you can actually measure from the outside. Get that measurement down and measure how much space you'd need to stack both bars and go from there. Chances are you'd have to put the upper light bar partially behind the GMC emblem to give you enough space to mount the lower one.

Posted

Well since you have the Denali grill you've for more space to work with in placement of your lights. That grill has the same pattern all around vs SLE/SLT and A/T grill you have to work with the spacing of the grill to fit between slats. You'd have to put both down low. Definitely wouldn't fit up top with the grill mount tabs. Even still on the bottom it would be really tight, but looks doable. Maybe consider one double row and one single row?

 

51d2dcc9ac8c001b664cfa4fe5d5ce28.jpg

 

My AT grill compared to Denali grill

0d061e6e9873d66e79d400c13b4d04dc.jpg

51bb27fe516661f6eef0f46c0fa13cdd.jpg

How has the honeycomb grill affected light output? If any. Thanks

 

Sent from my SG Note 4 on Tapatalk

Posted

How has the honeycomb grill affected light output? If any. Thanks

 

Sent from my SG Note 4 on Tapatalk

I haven't noticed any affect on mine.

  • Like 1
Posted

I haven't noticed any affect on mine.

I have the same grill on my 15 Sierra Denali 5.3L... Was thinking about doing this but wasn't sure about light output being overly blocked.

 

Sent from my SG Note 4 on Tapatalk

Posted

That was another option I was looking at. I know on my SLT there was some plastic in the way. Looking at pics on the Interwebs I see a pic of it done on a SLT. So in theory it may work.

 

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,958
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    B07
    Newest Member
    B07
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 701 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...