Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys, quick question for the electrical gurus

 

I'm planning to overhaul a few things starting in December, but first comes the bumpers and light bars. I plan to get rid of my current light bars and replace them with 2 curved 30" 4D optic bars that will run 300W EACH, so total of 600W. I currently have a wireless harness that is rated for 500W

 

Here's my question:

 

Is there anyway I can upgrade the relay and the blade fuse to allow me to get the harness to handle 600W? I really want to keep the harness since its wireless and I love being able to turn the bars on and off from outside the truck and not deal with another switch in the cab

Can I upgrade the current harness or do I have to get a second harness and just wire the trigger feeds together?

I personally think that upgrading from a 40W relay to say a 60W would be more than sufficient, but wanted to see what you guys say

Just want to get some opinions!

I also plan to get 4 extra light pods that will go in the bumper and angle slightly outward and be on their own harness

Posted

Mike,

 

You will want to add a second harness for the other light bar, but it is easily controlled by the remote harness. Just need to trigger the relay on the second harness with the output of the remote harness.

 

Some quick electrical math:

 

Power (Watts) = Voltage * Amperage

 

So that 500 watt harness at a "nominal" 12 volts DC is just over 40 amps. To get up to 600 watts, you're looking at about 50 amps. That's a big increase, and I doubt that the relay or harness could handle it for very long. Better to run an additional simple harness that is triggered by the first harness.

 

On electrical systems, amperage is the current flow... think of it like water trickling down a stream for low amps, or a raging river for high amps. Inside the wire, the electrons are doing the same thing, only when they bounce around they cause fiction, which heats the wire up and increases the resistance of the wire, which cuts down on the amount of power you can get out of it.

 

Let me know if you need me to draw a diagram that shows how to make it work.

Posted (edited)

I had traded the SLT for a Denali and get to start all over with projects. Already did reverse light LED PODS. I went to dual 8 inch pods (12 LED per pod) set up. Much better then 3 inch ones I had before.

 

So my question is..... has anyone successfully installed dual 32 in curved bars behind grill? In went back till in started seeing post I remembered from before.

 

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Edited by Toddfather
Posted

I had traded the SLT for a Denali and get to start all over with projects. Already did reverse light LED PODS. I went to dual 8 inch pods (12 LED per pod) set up. Much better then 3 inch ones I had before.

 

So my question is..... has anyone successfully installed dual 32 in curved bars behind grill? In went back till in started seeing post I remembered from before.

 

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

 

Are you asking about installing a DUAL ROW curved 32" or dual as in 2 light bars?

Posted

 

Are you asking about installing a DUAL ROW curved 32" or dual as in 2 light bars?

No I did that on old truck. I am talking adding 2 dual row 32 in bars. d0fb5200ab33dfcef97b2aa0de91856e.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Posted

No I did that on old truck. I am talking adding 2 dual row 32 in bars. d0fb5200ab33dfcef97b2aa0de91856e.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

 

I scanned just about every thread and forum and anything else I could find when doing research for my install, but I can't say I've ever seen someone install 2x dual row light bars behind the grill. Not saying it can't be done, but I personally haven't seen it. I did see on another forum of a NNBS silverado with 2x single row light bars behind the grill. Might be able to find a pic if your interested, but that probably doesn't help.

Posted

I like the challenge. It will fit with some light being lost behind emblems and lower grill. But if I aim them right it will be ok. Also plan on shim one leg on each bar help widen beam out.

 

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

I like the challenge. It will fit with some light being lost behind emblems and lower grill. But if I aim them right it will be ok. Also plan on shim one leg on each bar help widen beam out.

 

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Well since you have the Denali grill you've for more space to work with in placement of your lights. That grill has the same pattern all around vs SLE/SLT and A/T grill you have to work with the spacing of the grill to fit between slats. You'd have to put both down low. Definitely wouldn't fit up top with the grill mount tabs. Even still on the bottom it would be really tight, but looks doable. Maybe consider one double row and one single row?

 

51d2dcc9ac8c001b664cfa4fe5d5ce28.jpg

 

My AT grill compared to Denali grill

0d061e6e9873d66e79d400c13b4d04dc.jpg

51bb27fe516661f6eef0f46c0fa13cdd.jpg

Edited by Kerrslight
  • Like 2
Posted

Well since you have the Denali grill you've for more space to work with in placement of your lights. That grill has the same pattern all around vs SLE/SLT and A/T grill you have to work with the spacing of the grill to fit between slats. You'd have to put both down low. Definitely wouldn't fit up top with the grill mount tabs. Even still on the bottom it would be really tight, but looks doable. Maybe consider one double row and one single row?

 

51d2dcc9ac8c001b664cfa4fe5d5ce28.jpg

 

My AT grill compared to Denali grill

0d061e6e9873d66e79d400c13b4d04dc.jpg

51bb27fe516661f6eef0f46c0fa13cdd.jpg

9fb0bf592d38d8515b9ca35b7ba72bff.jpg

 

Pardon my crappy copy paste. But that's my idea

 

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Posted

9fb0bf592d38d8515b9ca35b7ba72bff.jpg

 

Pardon my crappy copy paste. But that's my idea

 

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

 

Well measure how much spacing you have from just under the GMC emblem to the bottom of the grill. You should have an extra inch, inch and a half on the inside of the grill than what you can actually measure from the outside. Get that measurement down and measure how much space you'd need to stack both bars and go from there. Chances are you'd have to put the upper light bar partially behind the GMC emblem to give you enough space to mount the lower one.

Posted

Well since you have the Denali grill you've for more space to work with in placement of your lights. That grill has the same pattern all around vs SLE/SLT and A/T grill you have to work with the spacing of the grill to fit between slats. You'd have to put both down low. Definitely wouldn't fit up top with the grill mount tabs. Even still on the bottom it would be really tight, but looks doable. Maybe consider one double row and one single row?

 

51d2dcc9ac8c001b664cfa4fe5d5ce28.jpg

 

My AT grill compared to Denali grill

0d061e6e9873d66e79d400c13b4d04dc.jpg

51bb27fe516661f6eef0f46c0fa13cdd.jpg

How has the honeycomb grill affected light output? If any. Thanks

 

Sent from my SG Note 4 on Tapatalk

Posted

How has the honeycomb grill affected light output? If any. Thanks

 

Sent from my SG Note 4 on Tapatalk

I haven't noticed any affect on mine.

  • Like 1
Posted

I haven't noticed any affect on mine.

I have the same grill on my 15 Sierra Denali 5.3L... Was thinking about doing this but wasn't sure about light output being overly blocked.

 

Sent from my SG Note 4 on Tapatalk

Posted

That was another option I was looking at. I know on my SLT there was some plastic in the way. Looking at pics on the Interwebs I see a pic of it done on a SLT. So in theory it may work.

 

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Of course actually engaging four wheel drive is step one or even daring to use a ramp like that with a two wheel drive and getting into a mess because of it. As to 4 low, these last few years if its a GM half ton it may not even have low range. A lot of the newer pickups have a lot lower first gear in an automatic transmission then they once did as it was common at one time for a gas engine truck or even the older diesels to just sit there and bog the engine due to the torque converter stall point and not enough torque was generated on reasonable traction to even spin a tire or get out of its own way up a steep grade and 4 low HAD to be used to get enough power to four tires to get them turning. These days traction control systems may hinder a vehicle in a situation like that although that means a tire or tires are spinning so in some ways the traction control can reduce wild spinning and anyone can correct me on that but I think some vehicles cut traction control off in low range ?.    By the sounds of it and you may have the proper equipment but if your responsible for helping vehicles out if they are not able to get out under their own power, I would say to be using a nylon tow rope or have one available so that one is able to give a bit of a run to help sling shot them some initial momentum as most tow straps are made out of polypropylene and impart way too much shock load if used to jerk a stuck vehicle into motion but are totally fine to use if going more from almost a dead pull with the tow vehicle and they are a lot less expensive to replace if damaged. That and some soft shackles to hook onto closed loop tow hooks on the truck your pulling as well as you having the proper shackle insert in your truck so there are no bad accidents with metal clevises joining things together or chain on the end of a tow rope or tow balls being hooked onto etc flying and causing damage or worse if it lets go. Its always a challenge pulling people because some are clueless and will over run the tow rope or strap and drive over it or that risk of ramming into the back of the tow vehicle so usually a few instructions are needed to clue in the driver of the stuck truck. Yeah ... have fun out there 😉
    • In their own words:    https://blog.amsoil.com/how-engine-sludge-forms-and-how-to-prevent-it-2/   [Quote] Synthetic Oil Helps Prevent Sludge Fortunately, sludge and varnish deposits are something that can be controlled. Using thermally stable synthetic base oils reduces the rate of degradation (oxidation).   Antioxidant additives further help reduce the rate of degradation. One of the most widely used is zinc dithiophosphate. Not only is it an excellent oxidation inhibitor, but it is also an outstanding anti-wear additive.   High-Quality Additives Fight Sludge Fortunately, it is possible to address many of the issues that occur after the initial oxidation stage. Additives, such as detergents and dispersants, help promote the suspension of contaminants within the oil and keep them from agglomerating.   Detergents, which are also alkaline in nature, assist in neutralizing acids generated in the sludge-building process. Antioxidant, dispersant and detergent additives are consumed during use.   To achieve maximum life expectancy, use a motor oil with high concentrations of antioxidant, dispersant and detergent additives.  [End Quote]   So quality base oil and then the last sentence above. TBN and ZDP levels matter. The one thing not covered was sufficient viscosity. Sad.     And yet we now have since API SN lower amount of them all with the only real change being a slight up tick in base oil selection. Along with lower concentrations of everything that makes oil work and lower and lower viscosity there is still an insistence on longer OCI's.    How low does the peanut butter and jelly level have to get before we say it's just white bread folded?    The new smoke and mirror treatment is the 'additives are INVISIBLE' to UOA testing with a health dose of TRUST ME.    I'm not picking on AMSOIL. This is coming from all of them. Every last one of them that abandon the low wear model in favor of the high mpg/EPA compliance model. 
    • First off use it in the way you’re more comfortable. In working in off road situations most of my life I used 4WD low range very little. In most cases when equipped I used auto 4WD. If I wanted maximum control going up and down very steep terrain  I used low range. Especially if I was driving a diesel. Same with very rutted terrain. In very muddy or snowy conditions I wanted momentum so high range worked well for that. With gravel ramps with limited traction I would try high range first. I would want smooth even increasing speed if I was fighting traction. Low range could give you too much to the wheels breaking traction trying to move. 
    • Having owned 4wd vehicle since the 1970s I find there are varying opinions on how to use 4wd, every owner is an expert in their minds.  IMO, 4LO is the appropriate gear and what I would use,  You have to feather the gas to avoid spinning tires and the lower the gear the better chance.  But like I said you will find those that think their method is best.  I live near a boat launch.  Yesterday there was a new Ford Maverick pulling out a pontoon boat almost 2x its size, they had no problems and they don't have a LO range.   True story. One winter day not long ago I was coming out of small town post office and there was a F150 4wd parked in front and was stuck foot deep snow ruts. I knew the lady so I asked her to put it in 4wd (wondering why in the middle of a 2-day snow storm she wasn't).  Her reply surprised me, "my husband" (the expert) told me not use that because it uses too much gas. She finally got unstuck spinning in 2wd which likely used more gas than not.  
    • Your tire pressure issue may just be batteries, you can reset them using tge Ing switch (I think) and the owner's  manual. ChatGTP will b e a faster, better help than Google.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...