Jump to content

Mower shopping


rusty01

Recommended Posts

Posted

Must say I really wanted a ZT but couldn't justify the cost. I ended up with a JD d140

 

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

Posted

I think I will be going ZT next time around. I just bought my first house over a year ago and have over an acre. My dad wanted a ZT for his yard so he gifted his Craftsman rider. Its in great shape and runs like a tank! I'll use it until it dies. My weekly yard work is my vacation so the longer it takes....the better!

Posted

We tried 2 or 3 different Dixon ZTR mowers before settling on the not as big welded steel deck with the 26hp Briggs. Wasn't as impressed with the Kohler or Kawasaki motors. The Dixons are very tough and the frame holds up great. That said if you REALLY abuse it the mounting points for the deck can fail and if you mow much replacing the blades once a year might be necessary.

 

Many people here have the Toros here and like them as well. JD and Grasshopper make great mowers but they're $$$. What sealed the deal on the Dixon for us was the power, welded, non mulching deck, and the dealer gave us almost what we paid new for the old riding mower.

Posted

My theory is buy at the quality level you can afford and take care if it. My mower is a Cub Cadet going on about 8 years, just took it out of Winter storage. My meter is a bit over 300 hours. The only issue I have had is one fuel line replaced, possibly ethanol caused.

 

I paid a little more than what many models go for at the big box stores. We have a large yard and I hope to keep it a long time.

Posted

+1 on that. I try to clean mine up every year. Take the deck off and clean the underside and paint. I always blow all the grass off the top when im done mowing.

 

Sent from my LGL86C using Tapatalk

Posted

I ended up getting a new Craftsman ZTR. They had a killer deal on it (over $700 off) plus I got another $200 off due to a web site glitch! Should be delivered next week. Can't wait!!

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Thought I'd update with a pic and thougths on the ZTR! This thing rocks!! Mowing is so much fun now! So fast, cut my mowing time in at least half! So glad I went with the ZTR!

10169209_829085520453095_691823749673357

Posted

Nice mower! I just got a Husquvarna 48" 26HP briggs lawn tractor myself and it is very nice too. Not ZTR but the inside radius on a turn is 18" so its a big step up from my old MTD yardman 42". I bought my old mower for $300 and it came with a garden cart, I sold the mower and kept the cart on Sunday for $350. :thumbs:

Posted

Nice! I bought an old Crafstman 42" mower for $300 and used it for about 5 years then the starter went out at the end of the season last fall, thus prompting the new purchase! I ended up selling it for $140 with a bad clutch, bad starter and a front wheel that kept falling off lol! This is my first ever new mower not to mention first ZTR and boy did I get a good one! Hell I bet just a new rider would have leaps and bounds better then my old Craftsman.

  • 1 year later...
Posted

I have used a lot of mowers over the years. Some good, some ok. it was like the difference between night and day when we got our JD Z445 zero turn. We have 2.2 acres of mowing with a lot of out buildings and trees. It has cut mowing time down considerably and far better at maneuvering around tight spots than previous tractor style mowers. Definitely worth the buy. Wife hollers at me when I do wheel stands thru the yard with it though. :lol:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...