Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm still not convinced that there re any units out there that don't exhibit the buffeting. I've driven at least 6 different rental units while mine was at the dealer, and very one of them buffeting. Some more than others, but they all did it. Personally, I believe all the units do it to some degree, but every person has a different sensitivity to it and a different threshold to when it becomes and annoyance, and hence a "problem". That's why the majority of the units are supposedly "OK". Those of us that notice it, and then (unfortunately for us) lock in to it, are kind of screwed.

 

How many reports have we had of someone actually getting their unit completely solved? Virtually none. And I would bet those same people driving in the majority of the units would perceive some amount of buffeting, whilst the owner completely didn't notice it. And, we've heard a few reports of people pointing it out to someone, who then became a "believer"! Lol.

 

As for why some units seem OK at first and then develop the issue, I am pretty sure that is tires. The reality is that as tires wear and get use, they probably do develop more Roadforce. In the old days, this was not noticed because the vehicle simply didn't transmit every little bump to the passenger. But this new SUV does transmit every little bump to the cabin. Drive 5 mph over some gravel and you swear you can feel every little rock! So, that super-sensitive chassis and body cannot tolerate any amount of unbalance or shaking forces put into it without transmitting it to the passengers, and setting off the buffeting. Trying to chase all the input forces is a list cause...GM needs to address the response, and isolate it from the source. Until they do that, ALL these vehicle are going to be a problem.

 

Do not kid yourself....there are no "good" ones out there, in my opinion and experience. It is a design flaw and that's that.

I thought that as well. I drove about 4 Tahoes and 3 Yukons, all with issue to some degree. The very first 2016 Yukon SLT 22" 4wd I drove had it the worst, driving me to google and this site. After driving a few Tahoes and all having it to varying degrees, my wife and I agreed we are not messing with this brand. However, one Tahoe only had it mildly and it was on 20's. We found a 2016 Yukon Denali on 20's, 2wd, optioned with the colors and options we wanted (more specifically, didn't want). We drove it and although the suspension was "tight" and had some booms, it had no vibrations or buffeting. We ended up getting it (one week ago today) and if anything it has gotten quieter. 450 miles right now. My wife mentions how quiet it is, more so than our 2015 Infiniti Q70L with the noise reduction Bose system.

 

My opinion is there is some design flaw or variance that allows the minor vibration turn into major buffeting. If your truck doesn't have that manufacturing flaw/variance/what have you, you won't have issues. We also noticed trucks with 2wd and 20's had the least issues.

Posted

My opinion is there is some design flaw or variance that allows the minor vibration turn into major buffeting. If your truck doesn't have that manufacturing flaw/variance/what have you, you won't have issues. We also noticed trucks with 2wd and 20's had the least issues.

 

Or, all are sensitive to vibrations but only some have vibrations. I'd love to have a trained engineer do a thorough side-by-side comparison of a quiet one versus a buffeting one.

Posted

Remember there was a member who noticed that the issues were felt from only the drivers seat so Jason, if he was a passenger, wouldn't have noticed the issues even though he's definitely skilled enough to know what to feel for

Posted

I have a 2wd '15 Yukon, and since the dealer put new tires on my factory 20" wheels, my issues have disappeared. I want to put 24" wheels on it this weekend, however i'm a bit hesitant until i'm confident the truck wont develop vibrations/buffeting.

 

I only have 300 miles on the truck right now...If the truck was going to exhibit the vibration/buffeting issues, would they be present now, or is there a chance they'll still develop?

Posted

Interesting that the 2wd's seem better. I must admit all the units I drove were 4wd. I also notice that there is a distinct increase in the vibration felt in the steering wheel when in 4wd Auto compared to 2wd drive, even though the 4wd should not be engaged (dry road). So does make one think drive-line.

 

That said, if I understood you, your 2wd still started out with buffeting, it just went away with new tires. Hmmmm.

Posted

Remember there was a member who noticed that the issues were felt from only the drivers seat so Jason, if he was a passenger, wouldn't have noticed the issues even though he's definitely skilled enough to know what to feel for

 

Yes, I've observed that too. Worst in drivers seat, better in passenger and hard to hear in 2nd or 3rd row.

 

I have a 2wd '15 Yukon, and since the dealer put new tires on my factory 20" wheels, my issues have disappeared. I want to put 24" wheels on it this weekend, however i'm a bit hesitant until i'm confident the truck wont develop vibrations/buffeting.

 

I only have 300 miles on the truck right now...If the truck was going to exhibit the vibration/buffeting issues, would they be present now, or is there a chance they'll still develop?

 

Difficult to say, but I'd say that all have the potential for the boom. My Yukon has standard 20" wheels and has boomed/buffeted from day 1.

 

The 2015 Suburban LT rental I'm in right now has 22" wheels and sounds no worse than my Yukon. I'd say that the buffeting is very slightly milder. Who knows, it could even be related to the alignment of the wheel when it's mounted as per the vibrating pickup truck thread. [hub centric, studs off center...]

 

It's all speculation at this point - no single thing has produced consistent results.

Posted

In my opinion the buffeting helicopter sound is just rapid body booming. The trucks that appear to have the "buffeting" more than others have additional forces (tires, rear end, road conditions, etc.) exciting the sheet metal. I have no vibrations at any speeds (20" wheels) and absolutely have lots of body booming and some buffeting. All of these trucks exhibit body booming to some extent. Purely a design flaw with the chassis, suspension, body/frame mounts...something.

 

I've had my Tahoe on a few 4 hour road trips. Wife and kids don't notice anything. I can hear and feel it, but it doesn't give me headaches or nausea. It's just a major annoyance to me, I think most are like the Escalade owner and don't notice it or think anything of it.

 

Totally agree that the buffeting is a series of booms. Totally agree.

 

Now, also see that for some reason, that vehicle is extremely easy to cause it to boom. I consistently hear booming when I open and close the rear doors. The detents in the mechanism that holds the door open is enough to set of a boom! So, imagine what driving down the road can do! I have spend some time trying isolate exactly what seems to be resonating when I swing the door but cants say for sure. Certainly, the door skin itself seems to be vibrating slightly, but not sure that's it.

 

The other thing I noticed is that the rear quarter panel above the wheelwell and back seems to be extremely flimsy and does a bit of a dance when I swing the door. I plan to do some more investigating over the Xmas break to see if I can isolate something. If it is the rear quarter panels, that might not be too difficult to stiffen from the inside, with some Dynamat and possibly even a strut or two.

Posted (edited)

Well, I picked up my 2016 replacement Yukon XL today, and after putting about 30 miles on it, thus far it is like driving a completely different vehicle. There is still an occasional boom across messed up pavement, and I still wish the V4 mode sounded better, but no ear pressure to speak of.

 

Keeping my fingers crossed. We'll be racking up miles over the Christmas season, so I hope to be able to give a positive report when we return.

Edited by Zig10
Posted (edited)

I am going to disagree that buffeting is a series of booms. The frequency of booming is much higher and well into the audible range. The buffeting is more like 20-30Hz which is below the audible range where you feel it in your ears more than hear it. You can have both at the same time or in my vehicle one or the other by itself. Buffeting feels at least to me like a change in air pressure while the booming is like being inside a large kettle drum or similar.

 

 

 

Frank

Edited by Elripster
Posted

Here is my before/after vibration test. Before was how the truck came from the dealer, after is with the new tires.

Is this an app on your phone? Which one?

Posted (edited)

I have a 2wd '15 Yukon, and since the dealer put new tires on my factory 20" wheels, my issues have disappeared. I want to put 24" wheels on it this weekend, however i'm a bit hesitant until i'm confident the truck wont develop vibrations/buffeting.

 

I only have 300 miles on the truck right now...If the truck was going to exhibit the vibration/buffeting issues, would they be present now, or is there a chance they'll still develop?

 

You are about the 4th case now that I've read where new tires and extra attention to balancing actually greatly reduced the buffeting/pressure. Very interesting. Honestly, I wouldn't even considering adding the 24s, however, it would be interesting to see your data numbers after the swap.

Edited by ajs800
Posted (edited)

Is this an app on your phone? Which one?

The app is called Vibsensor, is on my iPhone and can be downloaded from the App Store ($5 for full version). It records all sorts of data for one minute at a time. The data I posted was taken at 70 mph on the same stretch of road before and after tires.

Edited by flynnstone
  • Like 1
Posted

I'm in the middle of my first buy back on a 2015i Yukon XL Denali and have driven 3 2016 XL Denali's and they all vibrate and buffet. The dealer told me that he sees varying amounts of the booming and vibration in different Yukons. I've given up hope of finding one that doesn't do it but don't feel like I have any other options currently. I need a big SUV for a few more years and then I can get rid of it. I used to be a big GM fan and owned all GM vehicles but because of this and the way GM is treating me, I'm in the middle of getting rid of all my GM vehicles (save a few classics). And trying some different brands. I even test drove a Navigator (gasp, Ford was always my mortal enemy:)

Getting back to the Yukon, I believe, (just a hunch) that going to very light gauge high strength steel on such a big box of a vehicle and stiff frames and shocks have surprised GM with some of these unexpected problems. They will never be able to totally eliminate all vibration and road disturbances with the current technology. So I fear we are stuck with this until they start going after the body structure.

Just curious how others are being treated on buy backs?

Are you paying for the miles you put on? If so, now much per mile?

Are you having to pay the increase of MSRP price on the 2016 even though it's the exact same optioned vehicle as the 2015i? The MSRP increased for 2016 by about $2000.

Please give me your feedback.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...