Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Finally got into the K02 club! I got a good deal on CL for these Mehtod NV's last Dec but never got around to getting them put on until now. Lost a little power to the extra rotating mass but it was less than I had feared. Rides better than my stock 20s did so worth the trade off!

 

17x8.5 285/70/17

 

nyEqVSS.jpg

 

npOeyrh.jpg

 

0Ds895O.jpg

 

dsZa8W5.jpg

 

8BDAgwl.jpg

 

XktndFw.jpg

 

MsYbBaw.jpg

Good choice! Those methods look awesome with that color!

  • Like 2
  • 5 weeks later...
Posted

2017 GMC All Terrain BFG KO2 275/60R20 with Motofab 1.5" Level and Front Valance Removed

Day After Tires/Level Front

Day After Tires/Level Side

Day After Tires/Level Rear

 

  • Like 1
  • 5 months later...
Posted

Any thoughts on going with a 285/60R18? Costco has that size for a great price over the 285/65R18. I'm wondering if the 1" height difference would be that noticeable. Right now I just have the stock Goodyear HT's.

Posted
Finally got into the K02 club! I got a good deal on CL for these Mehtod NV's last Dec but never got around to getting them put on until now. Lost a little power to the extra rotating mass but it was less than I had feared. Rides better than my stock 20s did so worth the trade off!
 
17x8.5 285/70/17
 
nyEqVSS.jpg
 
npOeyrh.jpg
 
0Ds895O.jpg
 
dsZa8W5.jpg
 
8BDAgwl.jpg
 
XktndFw.jpg
 
MsYbBaw.jpg

That stance is killer. I’ve been looking at some method mesh wheels in 17x8.5. I’m leaning towards Ridge Grapplers for tires though. What level kit are you running?
Posted
1 hour ago, dmorrisL86 said:


That stance is killer. I’ve been looking at some method mesh wheels in 17x8.5. I’m leaning towards Ridge Grapplers for tires though. What level kit are you running?

Thanks, hasn’t changed at all from this pic still love it! Bilstein 5100s all 4, on highest setting in front(1.85), stock height rear.

Posted
Thanks, hasn’t changed at all from this pic still love it! Bilstein 5100s all 4, on highest setting in front(1.85), stock height rear.

Thanks for the reply. I like the thin profile of those mud flaps as well. What brand are those?
Posted
3 minutes ago, dmorrisL86 said:


Thanks for the reply. I like the thin profile of those mud flaps as well. What brand are those?

Weather tech, highly recommended! No drilling, took 20ish mins to install.

Posted
Thanks, hasn’t changed at all from this pic still love it! Bilstein 5100s all 4, on highest setting in front(1.85), stock height rear.

Thanks for the reply. I like the thin profile of those mud flaps as well. What brand are those?
Posted

its what i'm getting when its time to replace.. .i'll do the 60/20... like OP.

  • 1 year later...
Posted
On ‎12‎/‎13‎/‎2014 at 10:02 AM, JerryCanada said:

Set of KO2 installed about a month ago. Not as loud as the KO's I have on my work truck. This is 275-65-18 with a 2.5" front 1" rear RC kit.

post-131806-0-11335900-1418482808_thumb.jpg

Nice setup....real similar to mine.  Just curious...are those LT275 65 18 (Load Range E)?  Just wondering how you like your setup...ride, wear, etc.

On ‎12‎/‎13‎/‎2014 at 10:02 AM, JerryCanada said:

 

 

 

  • 2 months later...
Posted (edited)

2016 Silverado 1500

This thread has been very helpful to make a decision on what size to go with.  Here is my setup to help contribute.

Went with the 275/65R20 on a Rough Country 2.5" Level.  I ended up with slight rubbing on the rear of the felt fender liner.

No real comments yet on the setup as I have only put about 30 road miles on it so far.  MPG has definitely dropped off some and the ride is a little stiffer, can feel the bumps/potholes more.

 

BSA_1811-2.jpg

Edited by Deprime
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I'm currently running a 275/70r18 on GMC Sierra AT4 wheels. 2.5'' motofab upper strut leveling kit.

Truck Picture 3.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
61224af755697b3dbe7491cad3028195.jpg0d00af71503eaec00e836f9f6705b332.jpg
 
Love these tires! 275/60/20
 
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Nice set up! Did you put any level on up front? Any rubbing issues if not? I’d like to go to this set up but not sure what size tire I’ll be able to clear.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Nice set up! Did you put any level on up front? Any rubbing issues if not? I’d like to go to this set up but not sure what size tire I’ll be able to clear.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
2" level. No rubbing issues at all. I believe I could of went a little bigger without issues.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...