Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I finally got the front installed along with the rear.

I wasn't too interested in changing the ride height, so I just set the fronts one slot up from stock.

My goal was just to improve on the ride smoothness, and now the ride is much smoother.

 

I live on a country road that is pretty rough (patched pot holes galore) and there are several speed bumps (huge) on the way to work.

The truck (stock) rode pretty bouncy on the pot hole road and like a bucking bronco over the speed bumps, and now it just glides over them.

 

Definitely worth the cost just for the ride improvement.

 

Thanks

Randall

  • Like 1
Posted

I installed mine this past weekend. What a Pita it was. I rented a spring compressor which was barely strong enough to compress the spring or my air gun wasnt strong enough. anyway. Install advice.

It is very easy to pull the whole thing out. Once you do that - take to a tire shop and have them collaspe the spring. Well worth the $40 dollars I paid for them to do it. I also realized after figting with the drivers side to remove the upper control arm and sway bar link when re-installing the coliover, I did remove the sway bar link on the first side. This makes the process so much easier.

 

I wasnt sure I agreeed with Bilstein torque of only 19ft lbs on the lower and upper shock. I did it but it bothers me. Factory is 37ft lbs.

 

the ride quality - well I'm on the fence, it appears to be stiffer, guess that is to be expected since the spring is compressed more, even know Bilstein say thats not going to happen. I was going for a leveling job and hoping for a better ride (even knowing the factory ride IMO was great) or not to ruin the ride. So far I give it a B+. didnt improve the ride and didn;t really hurt it either. I installed front and back. I do think the rear is a big difference.

 

Greg

  • Like 2
Posted

Does anyone know what are the factory spring rates for the 14' trucks? The 5100's would be a great cheap coilover option with some softer springs.

Posted (edited)

Hey chuck1219, not that I'm a pro but I believe you install your rear shocks upside down. The body of the shock attaches to the lower bracket.

Nope... I have them as well and they are different for 14 now. Black boot down.

 

While I'm at it I ordered my fronts and am willing to pay my dealer to do it because its a PITA and its freakin cold here in WI. Two dealers treating me like I'm carzy to suggest such a job. Starting to piss me off!

Edited by sugarjohnson
  • Like 1
Posted

Oh on my 2015 they are opposite, body down boot up. I guess they changed them between 14 and 15. The dealer thot i was crazy too. Then wanted to charge almost 500 to put them on the front. I went the PITA way and learned a few things.

Posted

Oh on my 2015 they are opposite, body down boot up. I guess they changed them between 14 and 15. The dealer thot i was crazy too. Then wanted to charge almost 500 to put them on the front. I went the PITA way and learned a few things.

Posted (edited)

Oh on my 2015 they are opposite, body down boot up. I guess they changed them between 14 and 15. The dealer thot i was crazy too. Then wanted to charge almost 500 to put them on the front. I went the PITA way and learned a few things.

Double checked with Bilstein AND Allshocks.com (as well as others on here) boots down, logo and writing so you can read it for the 2014. Having the fronts installed tomorrow by my dealer.

Edited by chuckl1218
  • Like 1
Posted

Oh on my 2015 they are opposite, body down boot up. I guess they changed them between 14 and 15. The dealer thot i was crazy too. Then wanted to charge almost 500 to put them on the front. I went the PITA way and learned a few things.

Are you sure about the boot orientation? The part numbers are the same between 14-15. When I called Bilstein they said orient the shock so the label is able to be read right side up. On mine and others this equates to boot down. Confusing as hell? Personally I like the look of boot up better.

Posted

Double checked with Bilstein AND Allshocks.com (as well as others on here) boots down, logo and writing so you can read it for the 2014. Having the fronts installed tomorrow by my dealer.

He beat me to it!

Posted

Got my 5100 installed today. Max ride height in front. After reading all the stories about install nightmares I decided to pay for someone to install them. Ride is significantly better! I would recommend them but it will run around $800 with install. Well worth it in my opinion. Here's the before and after pics.post-136362-0-92951800-1421722778.jpg

post-136362-0-95461300-1421722797.jpg

post-136362-0-92951800-1421722778.jpg

post-136362-0-95461300-1421722797.jpg

post-136362-0-92951800-1421722778.jpg

post-136362-0-95461300-1421722797.jpg

post-136362-0-92951800-1421722778.jpg

post-136362-0-95461300-1421722797.jpg

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 2,064 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...