Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

FYI, GM is voiding engine failure warranties due to catch cans.

 

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=451361

 

 

It is a gray area. Technically it is a modification to the emissions system, and they are within the bounds to void a warranty if it causes a problem. The Magnussen Moss Warranty Act really doesn't apply. Not quite sure how a catch can could create a problem that required a engine repair anyway, but I suppose a bad installation could do it.

 

But the solution that many overlook, is installing their catch can so that it can be quickly and easily removed before taking the vehicle into a dealer. I run catch cans on all my vehicles, and I can have them back to stock in a couple of minutes using only a screwdriver if I need to. I really don't need to, as the dealerships I deal with are solid midwestern small town kind of folks that don't play these kinds of games with their customers. The techs are actually receptive to the catch can idea. They see the PCV oil problem daily in various engines and know that a catch can is a viable solution.

Edited by Cowpie
  • Like 1
  • 1 year later...
Posted

I know this thread is over a year old, but I am considering purchasing an ADD W1 ver 1 catch can for my truck.  But, are they only useful on the 2014+ trucks or are they beneficial on the NNBS (2007-2013) trucks?

Posted

OK, that is what I thought, but I only saw members with later model trucks participating in the thread.

Posted

I already purchased one from another Ebay vendor for $63.  The real thing.  Not a copy.  I don't know enough about catch cans to venture into the "just as good" market.  I got the ADD W1 due to online recommendations and reviews along with the reasonable price.

 

Thanks for the tip however.  Maybe someone else will pounce on that.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

They're the same.  They're both made in China.  Now the Chinese are copying other Chinese lol.  Gotta love it.

Posted
They're the same.  They're both made in China.  Now the Chinese are copying other Chinese lol.  Gotta love it.

Do I use the large or small ports on the catch can for my silverado

 

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Posted

I went with large.  I stepped mine up with a barb adaptor from the 3/8 off the intake to 9/16 hose.  A race shop owner I know says the bigger the better with catch can/evacuation type setups.  I was going to change the fittings on the can but the barb on the can isn't quite 9/16 nor do the threads go with anything lol.  Reinforced 9/16 hose from your local hose shop fits quite snug though.   

Posted

But, is the normal size the smaller ports along with 3/8" hose for our trucks?

Posted

I believe so, yes.  Doesn't hurt to take the fitting in to carquest or napa and test it with some trans line they have.

  • 4 months later...
Posted

I am considering purchasing an ADD W1 Oil catch can for my truck and found they have the DRIECT BOLT ON KIT with the new V3 Oil Catch can for my truck. Any feedback? The kit come with the quick snap fitting for the PCV and CCV side hose with the Oil catch can bracket.

 

 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Finally i got the Oil Catch can from ADD W1, V3 Oil Catch can. it's has the Internal Baffle TRIPLE Twister chamber filter system to trap more Oil. Some catch cans are just an empty container with a few ports, Anyway here are some photos. I'll try to post some installed photos when i have chance.

 

 

ADDW1-V3-A.jpg

ADDW1-V3-B.jpg

ADDW1-V3-C.jpg

Posted
6 hours ago, gm-jay said:

Finally i got the Oil Catch can from ADD W1, V3 Oil Catch can. it's has the Internal Baffle TRIPLE Twister chamber filter system to trap more Oil. Some catch cans are just an empty container with a few ports, Anyway here are some photos. I'll try to post some installed photos when i have chance.

 

 

ADDW1-V3-A.jpg

ADDW1-V3-B.jpg

ADDW1-V3-C.jpg

Did you buy new quick connect fittings or cut the ones off the factory line? I'm trying to find out what size and where to buy those fittings. I want to be able to just hook the stock line back up quickly in case i go in for warranty work.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...