Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Kind of off topic but how much was your mpg affected by the cam swap? I'm assuming that cam has a much larger fuel lobe than stock.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

After all the mods so far I get around 9mpg

Highway mpg about 22-25 not really sure

  • 6 months later...
Posted

Completed my flex fuel conversion recently. I installed the GM OE sensor and had BB tune it. Install was extremely easy. I started off with a 1/4 to verify operation, and currently have about a 3/4 tank of e85.

 

The truck already feels so much more responsive. E85 combined with BB ecm and tcm5 tune is a perfect combo! Total cost of conversion (not including BB AutoCal) was about $75.

 

Gas mileage is down between 16.5/17, but with e85 at $1.99 and 89oct at $2.35 around me, so it is slightly cheaper to run e85. I would highly recommend it?

  • Like 1
Posted

Completed my flex fuel conversion recently. I installed the GM OE sensor and had BB tune it. Install was extremely easy. I started off with a 1/4 to verify operation, and currently have about a 3/4 tank of e85.

 

The truck already feels so much more responsive. E85 combined with BB ecm and tcm tune is a perfect combo! Total cost of conversion (not including BB AutoCal) was about $75.

 

Gas mileage is down between 16.5/17, but with e85 at $1.99 and 89oct at $2.35 around me, so it is slightly cheaper to run e85. I would highly recommend it!

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Completed my flex fuel conversion recently. I installed the GM OE sensor and had BB tune it. Install was extremely easy. I started off with a 1/4 to verify operation, and currently have about a 3/4 tank of e85.

 

The truck already feels so much more responsive. E85 combined with BB ecm and tcm tune is a perfect combo! Total cost of conversion (not including BB AutoCal) was about $75.

 

Gas mileage is down between 16.5/17, but with e85 at $1.99 and 89oct at $2.35 around me, so it is slightly cheaper to run e85. I would highly recommend it!

With your conversion, did you only replace the sensor or did you have to convert the fuel lines/hoses as well?

 

I am looking to convert my truck to e85 soon.

Posted

Jesse7, I ordered the conversion kit from Carl and I already had a tune being crafted for the ECM by another vendor when I bought the conversion kit. I believe the conversion kit will have all hardware needed for the conversion (per Carl's site) and then you just need your ECM tuned for the tables to be utilized with the e85.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Completed my flex fuel conversion recently. I installed the GM OE sensor and had BB tune it. Install was extremely easy. I started off with a 1/4 to verify operation, and currently have about a 3/4 tank of e85.

 

The truck already feels so much more responsive. E85 combined with BB ecm and tcm tune is a perfect combo! Total cost of conversion (not including BB AutoCal) was about $75.

 

Gas mileage is down between 16.5/17, but with e85 at $1.99 and 89oct at $2.35 around me, so it is slightly cheaper to run e85. I would highly recommend it!

$75? Seems really low when I add up the price of the parts in post #16. Can you clarify what you did?

 

Jesse7, I ordered the conversion kit from Carl and I already had a tune being crafted for the ECM by another vendor when I bought the conversion kit. I believe the conversion kit will have all hardware needed for the conversion (per Carl's site) and then you just need your ECM tuned for the tables to be utilized with the e85.

Carl's kit looks to be the best route, but I'll wait to see what jetlife says above (considerable cost difference).

  • 1 month later...
Posted

$75? Seems really low when I add up the price of the parts in post #16. Can you clarify what you did?

 

Carl's kit looks to be the best route, but I'll wait to see what jetlife says above (considerable cost difference).

 

I finally went ahead and got the sensor and will be delivered today. I will be installing the sensor tonight, and if all goes well, tuning tomorrow. Excited to see what the outcome will be! currently I am pushing 340RWHP and I am expecting to see atleast 10-15HP gain.

Posted

Damn. Some nice numbers there. So factory numbers look like a 25% drivetrain loss. That sounds like a lot to me. For some reason i was thinking 15% was more like the norm.

15 to 18% is for manual transmissions and 20 - 25% for automatics

 

Sent from my SM-T817V using Tapatalk

Posted

15 to 18% is for manual transmissions and 20 - 25% for automatics

 

Sent from my SM-T817V using Tapatalk

You do realize that my post was almost 2 years ago?
  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

After some issues with the post office losing my package, I finally got the sensor installed, turned on and tuned. Jumped from 340RWHP to 352RWHP. Definitely feel the power increase, I even feel like it shifts smoother than before. After 100 miles of driving, my city MPG went down from 15mpg to 11mpg, but with the price of e85 way lower than 93 octane gas, I feel like I'm saving a lot of money. Install was a breeze, got it done in about 45 minutes - 1 hour. Did not have to change any fuel lines or hoses. I simply cut the fuel lines, attached the sensor with 3/8 couplers, tune, and that's it!

post-175255-0-65776100-1507557183_thumb.jpg

post-175255-0-69307500-1507557203_thumb.jpg

post-175255-0-65776100-1507557183_thumb.jpg

post-175255-0-69307500-1507557203_thumb.jpg

post-175255-0-65776100-1507557183_thumb.jpg

post-175255-0-69307500-1507557203_thumb.jpg

post-175255-0-65776100-1507557183_thumb.jpg

post-175255-0-69307500-1507557203_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Nice numbers - I saw similar gains on my '17 Camaro with E85.

 

I don't see a need to spend more money on gas on my truck since it's a DD so I'm not going to convert, nice to see the gains are good though

  • Like 1
  • 3 years later...
Posted
On 10/9/2017 at 1:18 PM, RideZX6R said:

Nice numbers - I saw similar gains on my '17 Camaro with E85.

 

I don't see a need to spend more money on gas on my truck since it's a DD so I'm not going to convert, nice to see the gains are good though

I took my 2018 Tahoe to CJ Tunes over a year ago.  Converted it to E85, along with a 6.2L intake manifold and throttle body, as well as AirRad intake tube and air filter.  The end result was amazing.  Never dyno'd it but I would guess maybe about 450/450 crank?  It HAULS BALLS, and has performed flawlessly for 15,000 miles.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/fuel-economy-stickers-don-t-tell-the-whole-story-aaa-data-reveals-why/ar-AA26ocHk?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=6a4122ea3dae47e5b8dfbed5d4fd3d55&cvpid=648f6b4fc2fa4eddb4c12893aeb957ed&ei=59
    • What’s missing in all this is patience and investment in the future. Buy a 170K starter home. Ten years later sell it invest in a more expensive home. Eventually you’ll have a 600K home and pay starter home payments. Buy a starter car. Maintain it well. Save the payments after it’s payed for then buy an expensive car if you desire. Buy a tumbler make your own coffee, pack your lunch. Cook your own dinner. Most importantly take care of your car.
    • People mislead themselves. Statistics are highly useful indicators.   Here's the tie-in to this thread. If an oil sample tests shows a wear indicator of 7 using cheaper ACDelco oil, and a wear indicator of 2 (lower = less wear) using a particular brand of Mobil oil, and wear has a linear relationship with engine lifespan, anyone could assume that Mobil is reducing wear by more than 50% (let's just say a 200% reduction for you red state people trying hard to do math) which leads to increasing engine life by 2x. Perhaps, in a vacuum, by itself, when dreamed by AI.   Yeah?! That's what the statistic is saying, isn't it?   No, it isn't. It didn't come out and say engine life is doubled. That's a very bad assumption, and a case of severe myopia by assuming something potentially untrue about the only data point in focus.   Average cost of a new car is 50k. You bet it is.   The median cost of a new car is more like 35k. Expensive cars are skewing the perception that "average" now means a $50k price of entry for a very average automobile. And that's not true. People who don't understand statistics twist the living heck out of them to mean all sorts of things they don't actually mean.   "Average" new car payment is $1000/month. Yep, it is. And in that number are all the $35k new car buyers who bring significant equity, and the $25k new car buyers who finance the car for a month just to get a rebate, and then pay it off. Know what isn't in that number? All the payments made by people who don't finance a car.   Picking one's own data point (don't have a car payment, never paid $50k for a new vehicle, my house cost $170k, I afforded a middle class lifestyle on $4.50/hr) is just a data point. Just like earning $25/hr in an area where the median home price is almost $1 Million is a data point. In fact, it's a lot of data points given that 80% of the US population lives in/around major cities. They're not idiots; the vast majority of them do it to make a living because that's where the big money is.   The highs have become higher, lows have become lower, and how your personal mileage varies is not truth for an entire country. At the same time you can't NOT acknowledge the data. While it doesn't paint YOUR personal picture, it certainly tints the reality that you also live in, as does your single data point.    
    • Glad you had success with it. I did as well, but about 5-6 months later it returned. Tried again, same result. This was after the dealer made several attempts and never even got it to slow down.
    • 3.15 Kroger’s in Montgomery Tx
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...