Jump to content

Any mpg differences with AFM off?


Chad2815

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 14 Silverado with the 6.2 and still working on getting the tune dialed in. Right now I have AFM off but Im on post with the Army so I am not driving much, just curious of anyone else with the 6.2 has noticed a difference? I also have the max tow with 3:73 gears so I know driving around town I could stay in V4 quite a bit. Thanks for the help!

Posted

I had mine turned off long ago. I think it makes no difference to be honest. I'm sure there are those that will disagree with me, but I'm still getting around 20 mpg on long highway trips so I will never have it enabled again. The lifetime MPG on my truck is around 16.5 so I'm good with that. My old truck with the 5.3 never got that kind of MPG.

 

I'm also not sold on the technology of the AFM with all the oil consumption issues of the past which was the initial reason I had mine disabled. My truck has the 3:42 gears so that is surely a factor compared to what you have but I'd leave it tuned out and not worry about it!

Posted

Yeah I am leaning towards that. I did have an 07 Avalanche that I left AFM on with and it never had any oli consumption issues after 212,000 but it could have been the Mobil 1? Thanks for the feedback, 16.5 is right where I was before the tune so thats encouraging.

Posted

No substantial difference in MPG with AFM off and AFM on. I've tried both with my Blackbear tune.

Posted

My thought is that is has a lot to due with where you are and what kind of driving you do. I'm in FL and have a very flat drive (few bridges) to and from my office with about a 10 mile stretch of 34 - 50 mph zones that I put on cruise. With the tranny in D and AFM will kick in for most of the drive and the mpg's go up quite a bit. If I do the same drive with the tranny in the M they are up but 3-5 mpg's below what the AFM readings are. With the AFM on any inclines switch it to V8 mode, so I think if you live in anywhere with hills or traffic AFM probably isn't doing much if any gains in mpg's. Also, when you going 70+ on the highway it's not staying in V4 much either.

 

Where I think it would save some gas would be flat back county roads cruising 50-55 for long periods. I did a 10 mile appox drive with a 25+ mph wind at my back last week and it was reading 32-34 mpg but at then end of the day I came right back at it so it averages all out.

Posted

FishinJ is pretty much spot on. Yes it will save fuel, how much is up to you and other factors. Notice they all said didn't make much of a difference. So depending on what you had to average the V4 against matters. Lots of idling, high speeds, stop and go, ect. But going from 21 mpg to 21.75 isn't really much to some but it adds up, it can be more depending on the area. Either way you slice it, any time it is in V4 it is using half the fuel, period...

 

Tyler

Posted

Does Diablo I-TUNE offer the AFM to be turned off? Im noticing some serious clunky transmission situations at low speeds. Between it shifting around like crazy and consistently jumping from V8 to V4 Im hoping a tune will make this more smoother.

Posted

Yeah I like it. Pretty simple to use with the canned tunes and if you want to go the custom route just google diablew, he does some pretty good stuff on the custom side. I got mine on rpthe pepboys website for 35 percent off so I sold my Autocal box and it paid for the diablo intune and the cistom tune through diablew.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,950
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Policeoff01
    Newest Member
    Policeoff01
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 784 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • On 2021 3500hd it consistently sets automatically when selecting park if the incline/decline is above a certain angle. 
    • Curious, did anyone ever get a fix for the vibration reported here.   I have a 2024 Silverado with 6.6 duramax.   I’m noting the same vibration resonating up through the steering shaft into the steering wheel.    Best way to describe- like someone is tapping on the steering shaft/components and it’s resonating into the steering wheel.    thanks. 
    • Hi friends - first time poster. I have a 2015 sierra Denali with 150k miles, I’m the second owner and she’s given me 75k of great service. I run a pulse AFM disable device. Starting Thursday when I exited the freeway after a short local ride it started idling rough, with an obvious misfire shake and was down on low end power.  I got it home and hooked it up to my scannner and found no codes but in live data a pretty bad misfire on cylinder 5. I replaced the coil, plug and wire with all new OE replacements (Delphi gn10165 coil, acdelco wire and 41-168 plug). It’s still behaving the same way after firing the parts cannon at it.   I know cyl 5 is a non AFM cylinder so I am not thinking this is AFM related but I’m kinda at a loss. injector? Bent pushrod? It’s running too well over 1k rpm to suggest those IMO. Has anyone chase this issue before and what was it? Any suggestions? 
    • 2017 Silverado L83 5.3l 6speed transmission Hello, not a new member but havent posted in a while and my old signup info isnt working so had to create a new account. anyways, I have an issue with my truck and hope someone can spread some light on whats happening: -when it goes to 4cyl mode it makes a clunk sound (but not when coasting or going downhill) -when in 4 cyl mode and under load it makes a load pulsating sound (not a tick). -goes away completely when in M5 gear or when plugging in an AFM delete. Im guessing it is one of 2 things but im not convinced of either to be honest. 1. lifter stuck in v8 mode 2. torque converter shudder realistically it doesn't seem like the TC as there is no physical vibration , and it never happens in v8 mode. but maybe? and wouldnt a lifter make a sound whether with load or not? any ideas let me know please. thank you!  
    • Which has made me wonder with the various engine failures of a few brands in the last few years, is it sub par materials such as lifters etc causing failures, or bearing clearances on the crank etc or perhaps bad designing of an engine physically or causing too much load on the components due to the hp/torque they can push out of them. Or is the oil viscosity and additive package of current oils or a lack of oil flow by an oil pump not able to supply sufficient oil at idle or under high load at low rpm. Or is it every item I listed that combined together has pushed the limits so far to the left that there is hardly a margin of safety left and add in some fuel dilution and too long of an OCI and premature engine failure is the result ?. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...