Jump to content

Will 295/60/20 fit with Bilsteins?

zback

By zback
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

amxguy1970 Senior Enthusiast

amxguy1970

Posted
Posted

Haven't you found your answer in any of the other ten Bilstein/tire size threads you started?

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/180531-biggest-tire-i-can-fit/

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/182977-anybody-have-bilsteins-and-2756520s/

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/183559-2956020-vs-2756520/

 

Three threads of Fox vs bilstein? Just search man, all that info is out there on this site and google.

 

If 275's have a rub for some people than 295's probably won't fit will then with out trimming. You can make anything fit, but you are trying to cram a 34 inch tire on a 1.8 inch or so lift...

 

Tyler

  • Like 1
zback Enthusiast

zback

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Haven't you found your answer in any of the other ten Bilstein/tire size threads you started?

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/180531-biggest-tire-i-can-fit/

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/182977-anybody-have-bilsteins-and-2756520s/

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/183559-2956020-vs-2756520/

 

Three threads of Fox vs bilstein? Just search man, all that info is out there on this site and google.

 

If 275's have a rub for some people than 295's probably won't fit will then with out trimming. You can make anything fit, but you are trying to cram a 34 inch tire on a 1.8 inch or so lift...

 

Tyler

If I had found my answer, I would not be asking the question. Thanks for the links though.

Edited by zback
amxguy1970 Senior Enthusiast

amxguy1970

Posted
Posted

Opening the same threads is not going to get you any closer as you are limiting your information pool. Try searching, you will find your answer; I guarantee it. Best of luck in your endeavor.

 

Tyler

Travis Whitmore Enthusiast

Travis Whitmore

Posted
Posted

900aa4d34d0a6f89e636d2ef6630ff5c.jpg3cc90d89b190662aff79a4e736a98f37.jpg

 

295/60/20 Toyo AT2's on 5100's. Granted I've got Cognito UCA's and an additional 3/8" top spacer (about 3" total lift). Did run these on a 2" level too. Rubs the fender liner and the sway at full lock in reverse.

  • 2 weeks later...
Patrick983 Enthusiast

Patrick983

Posted
Posted

My 275/65/20 k02s do not rub whatsoever. I ziptied the fender liner back before install but havent cut anything. Im running the bottom 2in Rough country spacer and thats all. I wish i would of went 295/60. They are the same height just 20mm wider. Mine look way too skinny IMO. The K02s,are skinnier than my stock sized michelins. The extra width of a 295 could cause a little rub id think but nothing major at all. I wish i would of trusted my instincts, and measurements and NOT the forum and got the bigger tire.

zack89 Enthusiast

zack89

Posted
Posted

Do you have a picture from the front of your truck to see what the 275/65/20 look like

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 years later...
TriZZZl3 Enthusiast

TriZZZl3

Posted
Posted
On 3/5/2016 at 10:16 PM, zback said:

The measurements on the tire (cooper stt pro) for the 295/60/20 are 34.29 high and 11.5 wide.

I haven't decided yet, but I think I will be going with the 295/60r20 Cooper STT Pro.  I like the look, the height and we need as much width as we can.  The 275 wide tires are just too skinny.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Jsdirt
      2010 Avalanche 5.3 not running correctly after engine swap.

      By Jsdirt · Posted

      Ahh, sorry about that - I got some bad info. Newdude is correct. That's what I get for working 13 hours straight ... on my "vacation", lol.   Should've checked the files I had instead of the internet.   Anyway ... this is GREAT news, since this would've been an absolute friggin nightmare to get working.   I'm telling you right now, your computer isn't bad. If it worked before the swap, it's working now. You need to do some more (better) diagnostics and figure out exactly what you're missing. Did you test every wire directly at the MAF? Have 5V reference? Ground? If you're reading ZERO g/s, your Hz isn't much use - it's going to be the wrong value anyway. The MAF is not working, and you need to find out WHY.   I got this off the net, so VERIFY first: Pin A: Black (BLK) wire, Circuit 552, serves as the Sensor Return (Ground).  Pin B: Tan (TAN) wire, Circuit 472, carries the Intake Air Temperature (IAT) signal.  Pin C: Yellow (YEL) wire, Circuit 492, is the primary MAF Sensor Signal output to the PCM. Pin D: Pink (PNK) wire, Circuit 339 or 539, provides Ignition 1 Voltage (Power).  Pin E: Tan/Black wire, Circuit 552 or similar, often associated with the Intake Air Temperature ground or signal return.  Global-A list: https://postimg.cc/KKJnQC85    
    • parthery
      GM Hard Folding Tonneau by REV review

      By parthery · Posted

      Correct....the end user can't reach to Realtruck directly like they can if they purchase a Bak, Undercover, etc...  It has to go through a dealer.
    • Matt Parker
      Clunk when putting truck into drive and reverse.

      By Matt Parker · Posted

      It is 4wd. shop told me it is the slip yoke. But not sure.
    • contrabombarde
      2010 Avalanche 5.3 not running correctly after engine swap.

      By contrabombarde · Posted

      No, I did not tune out vvt. From what I read it should still be able to run without it, it'll just lose some torque/power.    I can see how that would make it not run correctly, but why would that cause the faulty MAF readings?   EDIT: I just ran a quick test and checked, and as I expected, the computer sees that the VVT cam phaser solenoid is not present, and throws a code for it, and does not try to change the cam angle at all. Commanded position just remains at zero, 100% of the time. This makes me think that the VVT is most likely not the cause of the problem though if anyone has a different/better explanation, I'm all ears.   UPDATE: I was able to find that my scan tool does indeed support reading the frequency (hz) off of the MAF (I thought it wasn't supported but turns out I just didn't know where to look for it). I noticed that regardless of engine state it always however this Is not what I observed with my multimeter. Like I said before, the MAF seems to put out a normal signal during cranking and then the signal drops to a very erratic reading once the engine is running. It seems from what my scan tool is telling me that the ECM is not recognizing this at all, and just reads 0 Hz 100% of the time. This pushes me towards the the PCM itself is faulty. I I have the PCM out of the 2007 donor vehicle, which I may try to connect and program (it's only ~50 bucks to get the software for a one-time programming)
    • newdude
      2010 Avalanche 5.3 not running correctly after engine swap.

      By newdude · Posted

      Did you tune out the VVT?  07-09 they did not have VVT.  2010-2013 they did.      If you haven't tuned it, its trying to adjust cam timing.  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...