Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On 8/23/2016 at 5:12 PM, O_J_Simpson said:

Please do it. We need someone to do it and report back how it affects carbon build up in GM's DI engines. Keep us informed please.

 

142,000 miles. Most of them on a Riesch Racing 170 F thermostat in an IPSCO housing. Upper hose in photo below.

Uses old school 55 mm small block thermostats.  

 

It's a single cab and I have zero issues with winter heat even when -20 F. Fact is it will cook you like a turkey.

Zero issues with a quick warm ups. Yes they are lower peak temperatures. It is why you install them.

Tosses no codes.

Motor oil remains safely warm. Depending on load, 188 to 205 F. No oil sludging. No fuel build up. 

Transmission runs cooler that a thermostat delete alone.

On a really hot day, that is over 95 F it will run a bit warmer on the water but only a few degrees. That is to say the thermostat gets and stays wide open and does not throttle.

It does not over cycle ever.

IF you get caught in something like accident traffic on a hot day it will get hot enough to cycle the fans. Water and oils can reach the low 200's (F).

If you turn on the AC the fans will kick on sooner and keep everything under 200 F.

I experiences no loss of economy. In fact it has improved with age.

Zero carbon issues. Actually lowered the KI r e t a r d. (Got censored LOL) 

What else would you like to know? 😉 

 

At the time I did this mod Katech had not yet released this unit (174 F). This would be a cleaner installation perhaps. 

 

 https://gwatneyperformance.com/product/katech-160-degree-gen-5-lt-thermostat-kat-a7260/

 

IMG_0165.thumb.JPG.e970dbe4414abe53829584b49a9a1b54.JPG

 

 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Like 2
Posted

i'm using the  Katec 175 thermostat, best upgrade for Hp for the $$$ spent. you can also try the cts-V stat 195 not much difference vs stock there. 

 

not until i got my hptuners was i able to take advantage of it by adjusting the fans and telling the computer there is a 175 in the motor. a 160 will trip the fans to stay on all the time. if you run the 160, you need to purchase the hptuners upgraded OS  so you can tune the fans below 195, otherwise convert the e-fans to a full time mechanical fan system

 

i would spend the money again, stock thermostat is too hot 212 and the radiator on this truck is way too small, we got v6 radiators, try getting the tow max package radiator

  • Like 4
  • 5 months later...
Posted

I’m in need of a new Tstat and have been looking to see if there is a benefit.  Most say no but the last two posts appear to say otherwise.  I have An HPTuner and credits.  I live in central Texas and am not too worried about the heat but I am considering the 174 v the 160.  Current mods are headers and ORY to single straight through muffler and a mild tune.  The 174 seems a like a good option.   
 

As far as heat builds horsepower in drag racing, I’ve never heard that unless it was on methanol. 
 

@pokismoki @grumpybear would like to know more. Thanks

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, 2015 High Miler said:

I’m in need of a new Tstat and have been looking to see if there is a benefit.  Most say no but the last two posts appear to say otherwise.  I have An HPTuner and credits.  I live in central Texas and am not too worried about the heat but I am considering the 174 v the 160.  Current mods are headers and ORY to single straight through muffler and a mild tune.  The 174 seems a like a good option.   
 

As far as heat builds horsepower in drag racing, I’ve never heard that unless it was on methanol. 
 

@pokismoki @grumpybear would like to know more. Thanks

 

Lane: 

 

IMHO you would be best served using the 174 F thermostat. Not just because a tune isn't required. 

 

Log your oil temperature. It needs to stay above 170 F fully warmed to limit oil nitration rate. Guys that drag race and use a 160 F stat don't worry about it because they change oil more often than the accelerated rate will cause damage. The sweet spot for oil is between 170 F and 190 F. Nitration is a concern below and oxidation above. These trucks have an oil cooler in the radiator tank so it IS tied to water temperature AND load. Why logging is a good idea or at least monitoring it. Anyone that believes you have to reach 212 F to get the water out has never hung dried cloths in the winter :crackup:. It just takes longer. OEM's run hotter because most drivers never hit full temp and if they do don't keep it at least an hour to dry it out. Silly really. Cloths in the dryer will not dry no matter how hot it is IF you don't run it long enough. D'ho! 

 

My normal driving has the oil temp about 20 F hotter than water temperature BUT I can make that much higher running faster than MY normal. Each guys truck is different cause each guy is different. 😉. Pepper is so quite I forgot I had her in M3 once leaving town and ran about 20 minutes at 55 mph near 5,000 rpm. Oil temp reached 250 F 😱. Normally with my 170 F set up it runs about 190 - 193 F.  

 

Grumpy

 

PS. That cooler thermostat may not reduce temperature at all IF your radiator is too small FOR THE USE (load) you are asking from it. 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Like 3
  • 2 months later...
Posted

My radiator is going right now so i bought an all aluminum from Radiator Express for $350 stock radiator replacmement. Part number for Radiator Express is 227796 my stock radiator is gm part 84207654. I am also opting to run just a little cooler and buying the gm part 12674634 thermostat which runs at 194 as apposed to 207 gm part 12674639. Good read on this thread. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 2/18/2022 at 9:30 AM, Sean Murray said:

My radiator is going right now so i bought an all aluminum from Radiator Express for $350 stock radiator replacmement. Part number for Radiator Express is 227796 my stock radiator is gm part 84207654. I am also opting to run just a little cooler and buying the gm part 12674634 thermostat which runs at 194 as apposed to 207 gm part 12674639. Good read on this thread. 

$350 sound a bit cheap is it thecorrect one, is that the larger6.2 radiator or the stock 5.3 unit?

I've seen the 6.2 rad is very pricy for the alloy upgrade, $900  from Moshimoto,,, not sure what GM wants for a factory 6.2 rad in plastic?

Edited by pokismoki
Posted
On 2/18/2022 at 11:30 AM, Sean Murray said:

My radiator is going right now so i bought an all aluminum from Radiator Express for $350 stock radiator replacmement. Part number for Radiator Express is 227796 my stock radiator is gm part 84207654. I am also opting to run just a little cooler and buying the gm part 12674634 thermostat which runs at 194 as apposed to 207 gm part 12674639. Good read on this thread. 

 

Thanks for the 411 on this. I see they have two radiators for my V6. One for tow and one for no tow. Wait for it!! :crackup:

 

Part number: 84186716 with tow. $456.58 OR>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

23126398, 23126400, 23445975, 23394780, 23378658, 23445969, 84186716 (same part #) without tow for $217.64

 

And the difference is???? One has quick connects and the other does not. Yea, the part you can reuse from you old unit. 

 

Oh wait, there is more. The standard V6 unit, tow or not, is 1" thick. The V8 non tow is .875 and tow 1" thick. V6 uses 6 plate stacked plate internal exchangers. The V8 uses tube, single row single pass exchangers. Same width and under a 1/2" difference in core height. Same hardware. The oil and transmission coolers are the SAME SIZE in each unit and differ only in the fitting size and style. 

 

There is a reason Pepper behaves so nice. V8 sized towing radiator with stacked plate exchangers is standard on a no tow truck. WOW!!! And cheap too! Swap fittings from one side to the other. D'ho. Gotta love GM. 
 

  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted

Smokey Yunick studied the whole "water temp vs. horsepower" thing decades ago.  His conclusion was that an engine makes the most horsepower when the water temp is around 230 degrees.

Posted
16 hours ago, etex211 said:

Smokey Yunick studied the whole "water temp vs. horsepower" thing decades ago.  His conclusion was that an engine makes the most horsepower when the water temp is around 230 degrees.

 

 

And hence how outdated info and testing from "decades" ago is when it relates to much more modern engines and ECM's.

A LTx engine wont make more power at 230° of coolant temps, it will make less power due to the heat. The coolant temps alone will have the ECM pulling timing, couple that with it increasing the IAT temps and them pulling timing as well.

GM's Ltx engines already struggle to not detonate on 91, adding heat to them in the form of coolant temps and intake air temps will only cause the issue to be worse as the temps go up.

  • Like 2
Posted

I don't know if I would call Smokey's information outdated. It's more "Tune" specific TJay74. In fact your point is accurately based on this fact. Current technologies are not rigid their tune. They are adaptive as you note. And correct, a higher water temperature does all you say with all the results you list. Lower has the opposite effect to the degree the ECM is adaptive to and as someone noted in an earlier post you can exceed that tune with a 160 F if you live in the right area, thus climate. Why Katech and Reische Racing offer 174 / 170 F stats, respectively. 90% of the effect with zero need to retune. 

 

In Smokey's day this was not true. Tunes of the day actually removed what little flexibility there was from the tune. Locking or removing the vacuum advance plate in the distributor for example. In his world, stock car racing asphalt oval, even the mechanical advance was locked or very limited. 10W40 was also the rule of the day and viscosity is heat dependent. 😉 

 

Got back 50 years before Smokey and advance was a leaver next to the steering wheel.  Mixture was as well for some motors. 

 

Smokey's information can be useful if applied to the right situation. No sir, not outdated. Just not a common need for it. It's been awhile since a Winston Cup Gen 1 SBC has been raced at Talladega.  :P 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
On 5/13/2022 at 2:55 AM, TJay74 said:

 

 

And hence how outdated info and testing from "decades" ago is when it relates to much more modern engines and ECM's.

A LTx engine wont make more power at 230° of coolant temps, it will make less power due to the heat. The coolant temps alone will have the ECM pulling timing, couple that with it increasing the IAT temps and them pulling timing as well.

GM's Ltx engines already struggle to not detonate on 91, adding heat to them in the form of coolant temps and intake air temps will only cause the issue to be worse as the temps go up.

you sure he said that? your qoute might be a typo, 

 

I know some modern drag racers prefer a high oil temp and lower coolant temp... for reduced oil viscosity and best detonation resistance 

 

Smokey was working with carbs too, so the higher water temps improved atomization and fuel distribution in older v8's,  our modern reverse flow heads and DI injection is apples to oranges comparision

Edited by pokismoki
Posted
10 hours ago, pokismoki said:

I know some modern drag racers prefer a high oil temp and lower coolant temp... for reduced oil viscosity and best detonation resistance 

 

Ones I know use 5W oil to begin with. 

 

5WT Drag Race Oil

5WT RACE OIL - QUART

  • Popular for class racing in NHRA Stock and Super Stock
  • Also popular in NHRA Competition Eliminator

 

 

Modern racers know that the viscosity during the pass is what matters and that number when oil temps hardly hit 100F is high even in a 0W5. 

 

10 hours ago, pokismoki said:

Smokey was working with carbs too, so the higher water temps improved atomization and fuel distribution in older v8's,

 

Yea, I was tuning drag race carbs then. We used fuel coolers and packed the manifold with dry ice. Change density. 😉

 

There's enough going on past 6K rpm to keep the fuel vapor.

 

Smokey use heat and a lot of it in his "Hot Vapor Engines". 

 

https://www.legendarycollectorcars.com/featured-vehicles/other-feature-cars/smokey-yunicks-hot-vapor-fiero-51-mpg-and-0-60-in-less-than-6-seconds-see-and-hear-it-run-in-our-exclusive-video/

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Was sponsored by SYNERGYN from Dyson Oil Company for IMSA road racing  and we successfully ran a 3w30 syn blend oil in an engine that required synthetic  15w50 or 20w50 according to GM engineers. Cut a lot of heat and allowed improved tuning. 

 

Racing oil bottles vis specs are a joke. Meaning nothing.  There is no such thing as WEIGHT in viscosity readings. 

 

SYNERGYN was developed by Mike Dyson .  Many of their products taken to next level by former Gulf Oil and Amsoil chemists. 

 

https://wiki.anton-paar.com/en/sae-viscosity-grades/

 

https://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/294/absolute-kinematic-viscosity

Posted
42 minutes ago, customboss said:

There is no such thing as WEIGHT in viscosity readings.

 

Enough people believe it that marketing uses the term successfully. The rest of us know "Weight" when used like this means "Grade", An agreed viscosity spec at 100 C. 

 

We use the terms heavy and light to describe the viscosity of a pancake batter. Sometimes stuff just sticks 😬

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,913
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Smitty462
    Newest Member
    Smitty462
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 1 Anonymous, 636 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...